From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Breton M. Saunders" Subject: significant ioremap leak in i915? Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 10:28:24 +0100 Message-ID: <543A49B8.20400@mynah-software.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0EA6E26C for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 02:28:31 -0700 (PDT) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Guys, This might be covered elsewhere, but help me come up to speed: I am trying to analyze a leak in i915 that occurs on a digital sinage system that I've built. The system basically is doing a lot of XCompositeRedirectWindow / glXBindTexImageEXT calls to render web views and mplayer output onto opengl textures for subsequent rendering. In my testing, I observe that an enormous block is being lost in ioremap by looking at /proc/vmallocinfo: 0xffffc90000200000-0xffffc90010201000 268439552 pci_mmcfg_arch_map+0x33/0x90 phys=e0000000 ioremap 0xffffc90010f80000-0xffffc90020f81000 268439552 i915_driver_load+0x20c/0x6d0 [i915] phys=c0000000 ioremap So in this example 268 megabytes have been lost. Now what is even more vexing is if I stop the software, and X11 both blocks are still present on the vmalloc list. If I then proceed to rmmod i915 the i915 entry vanishes, however, the pci_mmcfg_arch_map mapping remains. It is entirely possible that I am doing something stupid from userland (opengl) however, my test runs reliably on an NVidia based machine - no leaks, runs until I power it off. I also think that whatever wrongness I may be doing in userland I shouldn't be able to blow up the system in this way. For clarity, my setup is: A NUC 2820 (I.e. Haswell N2820 CPU, 2.13GHz). 1Gb physical ram. Operating system: Ubuntu 14.04 (as shipped): kernel version 3.13.0-37-generic (i.e. Ubuntu's build) Xorg: X.Org X Server 1.15.1 Intel xorg module: compiled for 1.15.1, module version = 2.99.916 Acceleration mode: uxa (although SNA shows no difference with regards to the leak). Any suggestions would be welcome on how to address / analyze this - in the meantime I will be digging through the i915 source code to try to better understand the problem. Cheers, -Brett