intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: Introduce intel_prepare_cursor_plane()
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:15:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5478674C.8040305@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416858786-25376-5-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

On 11/24/2014 09:53 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
> Primary and sprite planes have already been refactored to include a
> 'prepare' step which handles all the commit-time operations that could
> fail (i.e., pinning buffers and such).  Refactor the cursor commit in a
> similar manner.
>
> For simplicity and consistency with other plane types, we also switch to
> using intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj() to perform our pinning for
> non-physical cursors.  This will allow us to more easily migrate the
> code into the atomic 'begin' handler in a plane-agnostic manner in a
> future patchset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 114 ++++++++++++++---------------------
>   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 17788f8..ff94e43 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -11899,19 +11899,51 @@ intel_check_cursor_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
>   }
>
>   static int
> +intel_prepare_cursor_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
> +			   struct intel_plane_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct drm_device *dev = plane->dev;
> +	struct drm_framebuffer *fb = state->fb;
> +	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(state->crtc);
> +	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_obj(fb);
> +	struct drm_i915_gem_object *old_obj = intel_fb_obj(plane->fb);
> +	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (old_obj != obj) {
> +		/* we only need to pin inside GTT if cursor is non-phy */
> +		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +		if (!INTEL_INFO(dev)->cursor_needs_physical) {
> +			if (obj)
> +				ret = intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj(plane, fb, NULL);
> +			if (ret == 0)
> +				i915_gem_track_fb(intel_crtc->cursor_bo, obj,
> +						  INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_CURSOR(pipe));

Shouldn't the frontbuffer bits be updated in the else case too? At least 
they were, prior to this patch.

> +		} else {
> +			int align = IS_I830(dev) ? 16 * 1024 : 256;
> +			if (obj)
> +				ret = i915_gem_object_attach_phys(obj, align);
> +			if (ret)
> +				DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to attach phys object\n");
> +		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void
>   intel_commit_cursor_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
>   			  struct intel_plane_state *state)
>   {
>   	struct drm_crtc *crtc = state->crtc;
>   	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>   	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
>   	struct intel_plane *intel_plane = to_intel_plane(plane);
>   	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_obj(state->fb);
>   	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
>   	unsigned old_width;
>   	uint32_t addr;
> -	int ret;
>
>   	crtc->cursor_x = state->orig_dst.x1;
>   	crtc->cursor_y = state->orig_dst.y1;
> @@ -11929,75 +11961,18 @@ intel_commit_cursor_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
>   	if (intel_crtc->cursor_bo == obj)
>   		goto update;
>
> -	/* if we want to turn off the cursor ignore width and height */
> -	if (!obj) {
> -		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("cursor off\n");
> +	if (!obj)
>   		addr = 0;
> -		mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -		goto finish;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* we only need to pin inside GTT if cursor is non-phy */
> -	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -	if (!INTEL_INFO(dev)->cursor_needs_physical) {
> -		unsigned alignment;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Global gtt pte registers are special registers which actually
> -		 * forward writes to a chunk of system memory. Which means that
> -		 * there is no risk that the register values disappear as soon
> -		 * as we call intel_runtime_pm_put(), so it is correct to wrap
> -		 * only the pin/unpin/fence and not more.
> -		 */
> -		intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> -
> -		/* Note that the w/a also requires 2 PTE of padding following
> -		 * the bo. We currently fill all unused PTE with the shadow
> -		 * page and so we should always have valid PTE following the
> -		 * cursor preventing the VT-d warning.
> -		 */
> -		alignment = 0;
> -		if (need_vtd_wa(dev))
> -			alignment = 64*1024;
> -
> -		ret = i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane(obj, alignment, NULL);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to move cursor bo into the GTT\n");
> -			intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> -			goto fail_locked;
> -		}
> -
> -		ret = i915_gem_object_put_fence(obj);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to release fence for cursor");
> -			intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> -			goto fail_unpin;
> -		}
> -
> +	else if (!INTEL_INFO(dev)->cursor_needs_physical)
>   		addr = i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj);
> -
> -		intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> -
> -	} else {
> -		int align = IS_I830(dev) ? 16 * 1024 : 256;
> -		ret = i915_gem_object_attach_phys(obj, align);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to attach phys object\n");
> -			goto fail_locked;
> -		}
> +	else
>   		addr = obj->phys_handle->busaddr;
> -	}
>
> -finish:
>   	if (intel_crtc->cursor_bo) {
>   		if (!INTEL_INFO(dev)->cursor_needs_physical)
>   			i915_gem_object_unpin_from_display_plane(intel_crtc->cursor_bo);

This is now being called without holding dev->struct_mutex. I don't know 
if that is necessary or not.


Ander

>   	}
>
> -	i915_gem_track_fb(intel_crtc->cursor_bo, obj,
> -			  INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_CURSOR(pipe));
> -	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -
>   	intel_crtc->cursor_addr = addr;
>   	intel_crtc->cursor_bo = obj;
>   update:
> @@ -12013,13 +11988,6 @@ update:
>
>   		intel_frontbuffer_flip(dev, INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_CURSOR(pipe));
>   	}
> -
> -	return 0;
> -fail_unpin:
> -	i915_gem_object_unpin_from_display_plane(obj);
> -fail_locked:
> -	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> -	return ret;
>   }
>
>   static int
> @@ -12060,7 +12028,13 @@ intel_cursor_plane_update(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>
> -	return intel_commit_cursor_plane(plane, &state);
> +	ret = intel_prepare_cursor_plane(plane, &state);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	intel_commit_cursor_plane(plane, &state);
> +
> +	return 0;
>   }
>
>   static const struct drm_plane_funcs intel_cursor_plane_funcs = {
>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-28 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-24 19:52 [PATCH 0/9] i915 display refactoring (v3) Matt Roper
2014-11-24 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm: add helper to get crtc timings (v4) Matt Roper
2014-11-27 14:19   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2014-11-24 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: remove intel_crtc_cursor_set_obj() (v5) Matt Roper
2014-11-24 19:53 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: remove intel_pipe_set_base() (v4) Matt Roper
2014-11-27 14:20   ` Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2014-11-24 19:53 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: Introduce intel_prepare_cursor_plane() Matt Roper
2014-11-28 12:15   ` Ander Conselvan de Oliveira [this message]
2014-11-28 13:12     ` Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2014-11-28 18:10     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-01  8:26   ` Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2014-11-24 19:53 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: Make intel_plane_state subclass drm_plane_state Matt Roper
2014-11-24 19:53 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: Consolidate plane 'prepare' functions Matt Roper
2014-11-28 13:00   ` Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2014-12-01  8:29   ` Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2014-12-01 21:25     ` Matt Roper
2014-11-24 19:53 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Consolidate plane 'cleanup' operations Matt Roper
2014-12-01 13:46   ` Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2014-11-24 19:53 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: Consolidate top-level .update_plane() handlers Matt Roper
2014-11-24 19:53 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Make all plane disables use 'update_plane' Matt Roper
2014-11-25  7:39   ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Make all plane disables use shuang.he
2014-11-27 15:57     ` Damien Lespiau
2014-11-28  0:53       ` He, Shuang
2014-11-28 12:21         ` Damien Lespiau
2014-11-28 12:55           ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-01 14:04   ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Make all plane disables use 'update_plane' Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2014-12-01 16:46     ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5478674C.8040305@gmail.com \
    --to=conselvan2@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).