Re: [PATCH] RFC: drm: add support for tiled/compressed/etc modifier in addfb2 (v1.5)

[Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>]

On 01/29/2015 11:30 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 05:57:56PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 01/28/2015 05:37 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> In DRM/KMS we are lacking a good way to deal with tiled/compressed
>>> formats.  Especially in the case of dmabuf/prime buffer sharing, where
>>> we cannot always rely on under-the-hood flags passed to driver specific
>>> gem-create ioctl to pass around these extra flags.
>>>
>>> The proposal is to add a per-plane format modifier.  This allows to, if
>>> necessary, use different tiling patters for sub-sampled planes, etc.
>>> The format modifiers are added at the end of the ioctl struct, so for
>>> legacy userspace it will be zero padded.
>>>
>>> TODO how best to deal with assignment of modifier token values?  The
>>> rough idea was to namespace things with an 8bit vendor-id, and then
>>> beyond that it is treated as an opaque value.  But that was a relatively
>>> arbitrary choice.  There are cases where same tiling pattern and/or
>>> compression is supported by various different vendors.  So we should
>>> standardize to use the vendor-id and value of the first one who
>>> documents the format?
>>
>> Maybe:
>> 	__u64 modifier[4];
>> 	__u64 vendor_modifier[4];
>
> Seems rendundant since the modifier added in this patch is already vendor
> specific. Or what exactly are you trying to accomplish here?

I am trying to avoid packet-in-a-packet (bitmasks) mumbo-jumbo and 
vendor id on the head followed by maybe standardized or maybe vendor 
specific tag. Feels funny. Would it not be simpler to put a struct in there?

But I was not following this from the start so maybe I am missing 
something..

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx