public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Tidy batch pool logic
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:00:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54DE0392.7060809@Intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421234459-21424-5-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


On 14/01/2015 11:20, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Move the madvise logic out of the execbuffer main path into the
> relatively rare allocation path, making the execbuffer manipulation less
> fragile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c     | 12 +++---------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 11 +++--------
>   3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
> index 9a6da3536ae5..3e5e8cb54a88 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
> @@ -866,6 +866,9 @@ static u32 *copy_batch(struct drm_i915_gem_object *dest_obj,
>   	    batch_len + batch_start_offset > src_obj->base.size)
>   		return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
>   
> +	if (WARN_ON(dest_obj->pages_pin_count == 0))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +
>   	ret = i915_gem_obj_prepare_shmem_read(src_obj, &needs_clflush);
>   	if (ret) {
>   		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CMD: failed to prepare shadow batch\n");
> @@ -879,13 +882,6 @@ static u32 *copy_batch(struct drm_i915_gem_object *dest_obj,
>   		goto unpin_src;
>   	}
>   
> -	ret = i915_gem_object_get_pages(dest_obj);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CMD: Failed to get pages for shadow batch\n");
> -		goto unmap_src;
> -	}
> -	i915_gem_object_pin_pages(dest_obj);
> -
>   	ret = i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain(dest_obj, true);
>   	if (ret) {
>   		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CMD: Failed to set shadow batch to CPU\n");
> @@ -895,7 +891,6 @@ static u32 *copy_batch(struct drm_i915_gem_object *dest_obj,
>   	dst = vmap_batch(dest_obj, 0, batch_len);
>   	if (!dst) {
>   		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CMD: Failed to vmap shadow batch\n");
> -		i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(dest_obj);
>   		ret = -ENOMEM;
>   		goto unmap_src;
>   	}
> @@ -1126,7 +1121,6 @@ int i915_parse_cmds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>   	}
>   
>   	vunmap(batch_base);
> -	i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(shadow_batch_obj);
>   
>   	return ret;
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
> index c690170a1c4f..e5c88ddd8452 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c
> @@ -66,9 +66,7 @@ void i915_gem_batch_pool_fini(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool)
>   					 struct drm_i915_gem_object,
>   					 batch_pool_list);
>   
> -		WARN_ON(obj->active);
> -
> -		list_del_init(&obj->batch_pool_list);
> +		list_del(&obj->batch_pool_list);
>   		drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
>   	}
>   }
> @@ -96,10 +94,9 @@ i915_gem_batch_pool_get(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool,
>   	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pool->dev->struct_mutex));
>   
>   	list_for_each_entry_safe(tmp, next,
> -			&pool->cache_list, batch_pool_list) {
> -
> +				 &pool->cache_list, batch_pool_list) {
>   		if (tmp->active)
> -			continue;
> +			break;
>   
>   		/* While we're looping, do some clean up */
>   		if (tmp->madv == __I915_MADV_PURGED) {
> @@ -113,25 +110,27 @@ i915_gem_batch_pool_get(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool,
>   		 * but not 'too much' bigger. A better way to do this
>   		 * might be to bucket the pool objects based on size.
>   		 */
> -		if (tmp->base.size >= size &&
> -		    tmp->base.size <= (2 * size)) {
> +		if (tmp->base.size >= size && tmp->base.size <= 2 * size) {
>   			obj = tmp;
>   			break;
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	if (!obj) {
> +	if (obj == NULL) {
> +		int ret;
> +
>   		obj = i915_gem_alloc_object(pool->dev, size);
> -		if (!obj)
> +		if (obj == NULL)
>   			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>   
> -		list_add_tail(&obj->batch_pool_list, &pool->cache_list);
> -	}
> -	else
> -		/* Keep list in LRU order */
> -		list_move_tail(&obj->batch_pool_list, &pool->cache_list);
> +		ret = i915_gem_object_get_pages(obj);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ERR_PTR(ret);
>   
> -	obj->madv = I915_MADV_WILLNEED;
> +		obj->madv = I915_MADV_DONTNEED;
> +	}
>   
> +	list_move_tail(&obj->batch_pool_list, &pool->cache_list);
Why is it now safe to do a move_tail instead of add_tail if the node has 
just been allocated? Was the original add_tail() wrong or am I not 
spotting some critical difference to how new pool objects are created?
> +	i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
Is it worth updating the function description comment to add a line 
about the returned buffer now being pinned and the caller must worry 
about unpinning it?

>   	return obj;
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index 3fbd5212225f..6357f01e6c46 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
>   #define  __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE (1<<30)
>   #define  __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP (1<<29)
>   #define  __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_BIAS (1<<28)
> -#define  __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE (1<<27)
>   
>   #define BATCH_OFFSET_BIAS (256*1024)
>   
> @@ -224,12 +223,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_unreserve_vma(struct i915_vma *vma)
>   	if (entry->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN)
>   		vma->pin_count--;
>   
> -	if (entry->flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE)
> -		obj->madv = I915_MADV_DONTNEED;
> -
> -	entry->flags &= ~(__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE |
> -			  __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN |
> -			  __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE);
> +	entry->flags &= ~(__EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_FENCE | __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN);
>   }
>   
>   static void eb_destroy(struct eb_vmas *eb)
> @@ -1154,6 +1148,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_parse(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>   			      batch_start_offset,
>   			      batch_len,
>   			      is_master);
> +	i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(shadow_batch_obj);
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto err;
>   
> @@ -1165,7 +1160,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_parse(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>   
>   	vma = i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt(shadow_batch_obj);
>   	vma->exec_entry = shadow_exec_entry;
> -	vma->exec_entry->flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_PURGEABLE | __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN;
> +	vma->exec_entry->flags = __EXEC_OBJECT_HAS_PIN;
>   	drm_gem_object_reference(&shadow_batch_obj->base);
>   	list_add_tail(&vma->exec_list, &eb->vmas);
>   

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-13 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-14 11:20 [PATCH 1/5] agp/intel: Serialise after GTT updates Chris Wilson
2015-01-14 11:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Fallback to using CPU relocations for large batch buffers Chris Wilson
2015-01-15  9:45   ` Daniel, Thomas
2015-01-26  8:57   ` Jani Nikula
2015-01-27 15:09   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-27 21:43     ` Chris Wilson
2015-01-28  9:14       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-28  9:34         ` Chris Wilson
2015-01-14 11:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Trim the command parser allocations Chris Wilson
2015-02-13 13:08   ` John Harrison
2015-02-13 13:23     ` Chris Wilson
2015-02-13 16:43       ` John Harrison
2015-02-23 16:09         ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-14 11:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Cache last obj->pages location for i915_gem_object_get_page() Chris Wilson
2015-02-13 13:33   ` John Harrison
2015-02-13 13:35   ` John Harrison
2015-02-13 14:28     ` Chris Wilson
2015-01-14 11:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Tidy batch pool logic Chris Wilson
2015-01-14 20:54   ` shuang.he
2015-02-13 14:00   ` John Harrison [this message]
2015-02-13 14:57     ` Chris Wilson
2015-01-26 10:47 ` [PATCH v2] agp/intel: Serialise after GTT updates Chris Wilson
2015-01-27 14:58   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-27 21:44     ` Chris Wilson
2015-01-28  9:15       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-28  7:50   ` shuang.he
2015-02-06  0:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Jesse Barnes
2015-02-06  8:31   ` Chris Wilson
2015-02-06  8:32   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-02-13  8:59     ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-02-13  9:25       ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54DE0392.7060809@Intel.com \
    --to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox