public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Michael Leuchtenburg <michael@slashhome.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Don't assume primary & cursor are always on for wm calculation
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:29:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F74106.7040309@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425435313-31711-2-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>


On 03/04/2015 02:15 AM, Matt Roper wrote:
> Current ILK-style watermark code assumes the primary plane and cursor
> plane are always enabled.  This assumption, along with the combination
> of two independent commits that got merged at the same time, results in
> a NULL dereference.  The offending commits are:
>
>          commit fd2d61341bf39d1054256c07d6eddd624ebc4241
>          Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>          Date:   Fri Feb 27 10:12:01 2015 -0800
>
>              drm/i915: Use plane->state->fb in watermark code (v2)
>
> and
>
>          commit 0fda65680e92545caea5be7805a7f0a617fb6c20
>          Author: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>          Date:   Fri Feb 27 15:12:35 2015 +0000
>
>              drm/i915/skl: Update watermarks for Y tiling
>
> The first commit causes us to use the FB from plane->state->fb rather
> than the legacy plane->fb, which is updated a bit later in the process.
>
> The second commit includes a change that now triggers watermark
> reprogramming on primary plane enable/disable where we didn't have one
> before (which wasn't really correct, but we had been getting lucky
> because we always calculated as if the primary plane was on).
>
> Together, these two commits cause the watermark calculation to
> (properly) see plane->state->fb = NULL when we're in the process of
> disabling the primary plane.  However the existing watermark code
> assumes there's always a primary fb and tries to dereference it to find
> out pixel format / bpp information.
>
> The fix is to make ILK-style watermark calculation actually check the
> true status of primary & cursor planes and adjust our watermark logic
> accordingly.
>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Michael Leuchtenburg <michael@slashhome.org>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89388
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index e710b43..93fd15f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -1924,13 +1924,25 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_parameters(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>   	p->active = true;
>   	p->pipe_htotal = intel_crtc->config->base.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal;
>   	p->pixel_rate = ilk_pipe_pixel_rate(dev, crtc);
> -	p->pri.bytes_per_pixel = crtc->primary->state->fb->bits_per_pixel / 8;
> -	p->cur.bytes_per_pixel = 4;
> +
> +	if (crtc->primary->state->fb) {
> +		p->pri.enabled = true;
> +		p->pri.bytes_per_pixel =
> +			crtc->primary->state->fb->bits_per_pixel / 8;
> +	} else {
> +		p->pri.enabled = false;
> +		p->pri.bytes_per_pixel = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (crtc->cursor->state->fb) {
> +		p->cur.enabled = true;
> +		p->cur.bytes_per_pixel = 4;
> +	} else {
> +		p->cur.enabled = false;
> +		p->cur.bytes_per_pixel = 0;
> +	}
>   	p->pri.horiz_pixels = intel_crtc->config->pipe_src_w;
>   	p->cur.horiz_pixels = intel_crtc->base.cursor->state->crtc_w;
> -	/* TODO: for now, assume primary and cursor planes are always enabled. */
> -	p->pri.enabled = true;
> -	p->cur.enabled = true;
>
>   	drm_for_each_legacy_plane(plane, &dev->mode_config.plane_list) {
>   		struct intel_plane *intel_plane = to_intel_plane(plane);
>

Hm there are other place which dereference crtc->primary->state->fb, 
like i9xx_update_wm and skl_compute_wm_pipe_parameters - they won't 
suffer the same problem?

Regards,

Tvrtko

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-04 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-04  2:15 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Don't require primary->fb in intel_crtc_active() Matt Roper
2015-03-04  2:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Don't assume primary & cursor are always on for wm calculation Matt Roper
2015-03-04  8:18   ` Jani Nikula
2015-03-04 16:17   ` shuang.he
2015-03-04 17:29   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2015-03-06  1:31     ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Don't assume primary & cursor are always on for wm calculation (v2) Matt Roper
2015-03-06  9:58       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-06 12:57       ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-03-04  9:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Don't require primary->fb in intel_crtc_active() Ville Syrjälä
2015-03-04 16:13   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-04 18:21     ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-03-05 12:20       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-05 12:48         ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-03-04 16:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-04 17:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-04 17:42   ` Matt Roper
2015-03-05 15:07     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-06 16:44       ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54F74106.7040309@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=michael@slashhome.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox