From: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/chv: Remove Wait for a previous gfx force-off
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 20:20:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55005646.30309@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54EF3EEE.3020701@linux.intel.com>
On Thursday 26 February 2015 09:12 PM, Deepak S wrote:
>
> On Thursday 26 February 2015 09:13 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:46:54PM +0530, deepak.s@linux.intel.com
>> wrote:
>>> From: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> On CHV, PUNIT team confirmed that 'VLV_GFX_CLK_STATUS_BIT' is not a
>>> sticky bit and it will always be set. So ignore Check for previous
>>> Gfx force off during suspend and allow the force clk as part S0ix
>>> Sequence
>> Do we need the force clock at all since we don't do any gunit register
>> save/restore? I tried to peddle a patch to remove it totally in this bug
>> report, but never got any decent answer back:
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87086
>
> hmm. your right we might not need. Let me confirm
Hi Ville,
Based on the spec we still need to follow the Gfx force clk sequence :(
Can you review the patch to skip wait for previous Gfx force-off?
This patch has gone through lot of S0ix testing.
Thanks
Deepak
>>> Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 6 ++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>>> index 4badb23..b88b7b1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
>>> @@ -1193,11 +1193,13 @@ int vlv_force_gfx_clock(struct
>>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool force_on)
>>> int err;
>>> val = I915_READ(VLV_GTLC_SURVIVABILITY_REG);
>>> - WARN_ON(!!(val & VLV_GFX_CLK_FORCE_ON_BIT) == force_on);
>>> #define COND (I915_READ(VLV_GTLC_SURVIVABILITY_REG) &
>>> VLV_GFX_CLK_STATUS_BIT)
>>> /* Wait for a previous force-off to settle */
>>> - if (force_on) {
>>> + if (force_on && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv->dev)) {
>>> + /* WARN_ON only for the Valleyview */
>>> + WARN_ON(!!(val & VLV_GFX_CLK_FORCE_ON_BIT) == force_on);
>>> +
>>> err = wait_for(!COND, 20);
>>> if (err) {
>>> DRM_ERROR("timeout waiting for GFX clock force-off
>>> (%08x)\n",
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-11 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-26 15:16 [PATCH 0/5] CHV PM fix & Improvements deepak.s
2015-02-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/chv: Remove Wait for a previous gfx force-off deepak.s
2015-02-26 15:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-02-26 15:42 ` Deepak S
2015-03-11 14:50 ` Deepak S [this message]
2015-02-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Re-adjusting rc6 promotional timer for chv deepak.s
2015-03-23 19:43 ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-24 3:05 ` Deepak S
2015-02-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/chv: Set min freq to efficient frequency on chv deepak.s
2015-02-26 16:12 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-11 13:53 ` Deepak S
2015-03-11 14:06 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-11 14:29 ` Deepak S
2015-02-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Modifying RC6 Promotion timer for Media workloads deepak.s
2015-02-26 16:08 ` Chris Wilson
2015-02-27 2:53 ` Deepak S
2015-03-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v2] " deepak.s
2015-03-06 16:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-11 13:37 ` Deepak S
2015-03-11 13:56 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-11 13:59 ` Deepak S
2015-02-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Setup static bias for GPU deepak.s
2015-02-28 15:23 ` shuang.he
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55005646.30309@linux.intel.com \
--to=deepak.s@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox