From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Optimistically spin for the request completion
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:14:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55019136.4@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426158677-26261-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 03/12/2015 11:11 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> This provides a nice boost to mesa in swap bound scenarios (as mesa
> throttles itself to the previous frame and given the scenario that will
> complete shortly). It will also provide a good boost to systems running
> with semaphores disabled and so frequently waiting on the GPU as it
> switches rings. In the most favourable of microbenchmarks, this can
> increase performance by around 15% - though in practice improvements
> will be marginal and rarely noticeable.
>
> v2: Account for user timeouts
> v3: Limit the spinning to a single jiffie (~1us) at most. On an
> otherwise idle system, there is no scheduler contention and so without a
> limit we would spin until the GPU is ready.
Isn't one jiffie 1-10ms typically?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-12 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-11 15:29 [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Optimistically spin for the request completion Chris Wilson
2015-03-11 21:18 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-12 9:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-12 9:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-12 11:11 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Wilson
2015-03-12 12:06 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-12 13:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2015-03-12 13:18 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-12 15:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-12 16:28 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-12 16:41 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-12 16:50 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-12 17:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-13 9:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-12 19:27 ` shuang.he
2015-03-19 15:16 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-20 14:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-20 15:27 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v4] " Chris Wilson
2015-03-20 16:01 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-20 16:19 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-20 16:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-23 8:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-20 22:59 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-21 9:49 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-23 8:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-23 9:09 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-20 21:30 ` shuang.he
2015-03-11 23:07 ` [PATCH v2] " shuang.he
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55019136.4@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox