From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/skl: Support secondary (rotated) frame buffer mapping
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:07:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <550AE641.2010004@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426770123.3473.29.camel@jlahtine-mobl1>
Hi,
On 03/19/2015 01:02 PM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
>> static inline
>> int i915_get_ggtt_vma_pages(struct i915_vma *vma)
>
> Same rant about function signatures as on earlier patch, put all on the
> same line like most of new the code has it.
Ok.
>> struct i915_ggtt_view {
>> enum i915_ggtt_view_type type;
>>
>> struct sg_table *pages;
>> +
>> + union {
>> + struct intel_rotation_info rotation_info;
>> + };
>
> In preparation for the memcmp way of comparing views, I would move this
> be before the variable struct parts (namely sg_table *pages), and also
> wrap it once more so the result would be like this:
>
> [snip]
> enum i915_ggtt_view_type type;
>
> union {
> struct {
> struct intel_rotation_info info;
> } rotated;
> struct {
> ...
> } partial;
> };
>
> // private bits go here, to be wrapped in their struct with view
> // type comparing patches
>
> struct sg_table *pages;
> [snip]
>
> That way it's clear which view owns what.
Hm, rotation info is not considered in comparing views, it is just a
bucket of data passed around between layers. So I suppose private data
under your design. Since there is no private union yet, maybe do this later?
>> extern const struct i915_ggtt_view i915_ggtt_view_normal;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index fe11e99..c2c3a76 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -2194,7 +2194,7 @@ static bool need_vtd_wa(struct drm_device *dev)
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> -static unsigned int
>> +unsigned int
>> intel_tile_height(struct drm_device *dev, uint32_t pixel_format,
>> uint64_t fb_format_modifier)
>> {
>> @@ -2254,9 +2254,34 @@ int intel_fill_fb_ggtt_view(struct i915_ggtt_view *view,
>> struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>> const struct drm_plane_state *plane_state)
>> {
>> + struct intel_rotation_info *info = &view->rotation_info;
>> + static const struct i915_ggtt_view rotated_view =
>> + { .type = I915_GGTT_VIEW_ROTATED };
>> +
>> *view = i915_ggtt_view_normal;
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + if (!plane_state)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (!(plane_state->rotation &
>> + (BIT(DRM_ROTATE_90) | BIT(DRM_ROTATE_270))))
>> + return 0;
>
> Should the rotation checking helper introduced in previous patch be used
> here too?
It's the other way round, following patch adds the helper and replaces
this with a call to it.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-17 15:45 [PATCH v4 0/7] Skylake 90/270 display rotation Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/skl: Extract tile height code into a helper function Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-18 12:50 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-03-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Use GGTT view when (un)pinning objects to planes Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-18 13:52 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-03-18 13:57 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Pass in plane state when (un)pinning frame buffers Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-18 14:01 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-03-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Helper function to determine GGTT view from plane state Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-18 14:10 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-03-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/skl: Support secondary (rotated) frame buffer mapping Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-19 13:02 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-03-19 15:07 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2015-03-20 12:01 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-03-20 12:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-20 13:31 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-03-20 13:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/skl: Query display address through a wrapper Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-19 13:03 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-03-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/skl: Take 90/270 rotation into account in watermark calculations Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-19 14:05 ` Joonas Lahtinen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-23 11:10 [PATCH v5 0/7] Skylake 90/270 display rotation Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-23 11:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/skl: Support secondary (rotated) frame buffer mapping Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-23 13:03 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-03-05 14:07 [PATCH v3 0/7] Skylake 90/270 display rotation Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-03-05 14:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/skl: Support secondary (rotated) frame buffer mapping Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=550AE641.2010004@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox