public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_mmap_gtt: add huge BO test
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:32:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <552BA967.7070101@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428409388.22682.3.camel@jlahtine-mobl1>


Hi,

On 04/07/2015 01:23 PM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Add a straightforward test that allocates a BO that is bigger than
> (by 1 page currently) the mappable aperture, tests mmap access to it
> by CPU directly and through GTT in sequence.
>
> Currently it is expected for the GTT access to gracefully fail as
> all objects are attempted to get pinned to GTT completely for mmap
> access. Once the partial view support is merged to kernel, the test
> should pass for all parts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/gem_mmap_gtt.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_mmap_gtt.c b/tests/gem_mmap_gtt.c
> index 55c66a2..bf3627c 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_mmap_gtt.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_mmap_gtt.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@
>   #include "drmtest.h"
>   #include "igt_debugfs.h"
>
> +#ifndef PAGE_SIZE
> +#define PAGE_SIZE 4096
> +#endif
> +
>   static int OBJECT_SIZE = 16*1024*1024;
>
>   static void set_domain(int fd, uint32_t handle)
> @@ -258,6 +262,68 @@ test_write_gtt(int fd)
>   }
>
>   static void
> +test_huge_bo(int fd)
> +{
> +	uint32_t bo;
> +	char *ptr_cpu;
> +	char *ptr_gtt;
> +	char *cpu_pattern;
> +	uint64_t mappable_aperture_pages = gem_mappable_aperture_size() /
> +					   PAGE_SIZE;
> +	uint64_t huge_object_size = (mappable_aperture_pages + 1) * PAGE_SIZE;
> +	uint64_t last_offset = huge_object_size - PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> +	cpu_pattern = malloc(PAGE_SIZE);
> +	igt_assert(cpu_pattern);

I'd be tempted to use 4k from the stack for simplicity.

> +	memset(cpu_pattern, 0xaa, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +	bo = gem_create(fd, huge_object_size);
> +
> +	ptr_cpu = gem_mmap__cpu(fd, bo, 0, huge_object_size,
> +				PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> +	if (!ptr_cpu) {
> +		igt_warn("Not enough free memory for huge BO test!\n");
> +		goto out;

Free address space or free memory?

Also, igt_require so test skips in that case?

> +	}
> +
> +	/* Test read/write to first/last page with CPU. */
> +	memcpy(ptr_cpu, cpu_pattern, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	igt_assert(memcmp(ptr_cpu, cpu_pattern, PAGE_SIZE) == 0);
> +
> +	memcpy(ptr_cpu + last_offset, cpu_pattern, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	igt_assert(memcmp(ptr_cpu + last_offset, cpu_pattern, PAGE_SIZE) == 0);
> +
> +	igt_assert(memcmp(ptr_cpu, ptr_cpu + last_offset, PAGE_SIZE) == 0);
> +
> +	munmap(ptr_cpu, huge_object_size);
> +	ptr_cpu = NULL;
> +
> +	ptr_gtt = gem_mmap__gtt(fd, bo, huge_object_size,
> +			        PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> +	if (!ptr_gtt) {
> +		igt_debug("Huge BO GTT mapping not supported!\n");
> +		goto out;

igt_require as above? Hm, although ideally test would be able to detect 
the feature (once it is added to the kernel) so it could assert here.

> +	}
> +
> +	/* Test read/write to first/last page through GTT. */
> +	set_domain(fd, bo);
> +
> +	igt_assert(memcmp(ptr_gtt, cpu_pattern, PAGE_SIZE) == 0);
> +	igt_assert(memcmp(ptr_gtt + last_offset, cpu_pattern, PAGE_SIZE) == 0);
> +
> +	memset(ptr_gtt, 0x55, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	igt_assert(memcmp(ptr_gtt + last_offset, cpu_pattern, PAGE_SIZE) == 0);
> +
> +	memset(ptr_gtt + last_offset, 0x55, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	igt_assert(memcmp(ptr_gtt, ptr_gtt + last_offset, PAGE_SIZE) == 0);

Comments for the above would be nice just to explain what is being 
tested and how.

Won't the last test has side effects with partial views since it is 
accessing beginning and end of the object? Would it be better to memcmp 
against a pattern on stack or in heap like cpu_pattern?

Will you support two simultaneous partial views or the last memcmp will 
cause a lot of partial view creation/destruction?

> +
> +	munmap(ptr_gtt, huge_object_size);
> +out:
> +	gem_close(fd, bo);
> +	free(cpu_pattern);
> +}
> +
> +static void
>   test_read(int fd)
>   {
>   	void *dst;
> @@ -395,6 +461,8 @@ igt_main
>   		run_without_prefault(fd, test_write_gtt);
>   	igt_subtest("write-cpu-read-gtt")
>   		test_write_cpu_read_gtt(fd);
> +	igt_subtest("huge-bo")
> +		test_huge_bo(fd);
>
>   	igt_fixture
>   		close(fd);
>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-13 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-07 12:23 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_mmap_gtt: add huge BO test Joonas Lahtinen
2015-04-07 14:08 ` Chris Wilson
2015-04-08 10:45   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-04-08 10:50   ` [PATCH i-g-t v2 1/2] tests/gem_mmap_gtt: Clarify BO domain setting functions Joonas Lahtinen
2015-04-08 10:51   ` [PATCH i-g-t v2 2/2] tests/gem_mmap_gtt: add huge BO test Joonas Lahtinen
2015-04-08 11:00     ` Chris Wilson
2015-04-08 12:55       ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 1/2] tests/gem_mmap_gtt: clarify BO domain setting functions Joonas Lahtinen
2015-04-13  6:03         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-04-08 12:57       ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 2/2] tests/gem_mmap_gtt: add huge BO test Joonas Lahtinen
2015-04-13 11:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2015-04-13 14:22   ` [PATCH i-g-t] " Joonas Lahtinen
2015-04-13 14:49     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-04-14 11:14       ` [PATCH i-g-t v5] " Joonas Lahtinen
2015-04-14 11:23         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-04-14 16:51         ` Thomas Wood
2015-04-13 14:22   ` [PATCH i-g-t v4 2/2] " Joonas Lahtinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=552BA967.7070101@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox