public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com, Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] drm/i915: Removed now redudant parameter to i915_gem_request_completed()
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:57:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55315791.6070904@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426873717-10176-3-git-send-email-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>

On 20/03/15 17:48, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> 
> The change to the implementation of i915_gem_request_completed() means that the
> lazy coherency flag is no longer used. This can now be removed to simplify the
> interface.
> 
> For: VIZ-5190
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c  |    2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      |    3 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c      |   14 +++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c      |    2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |    2 +-
>  5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Just to bring this up to date, there are three more instances that have
appeared since this patch was written; here are the additional changes:

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 4dd8b41..f4ba6fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -6801,7 +6801,7 @@ static void __intel_rps_boost_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>         struct request_boost *boost = container_of(work, struct request_boost, work);
>  
> -       if (!i915_gem_request_completed(boost->rq, true))
> +       if (!i915_gem_request_completed(boost->rq))
>                 gen6_rps_boost(to_i915(boost->rq->ring->dev), NULL);
>  
>         i915_gem_request_unreference__unlocked(boost->rq);
> dsgordon@dsgordon-linux:/usr2/dsgordon/Source/JH-OTC-DRM/OTC-DRM$ git diff drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 7c97005..9d6b8bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ static int __i915_spin_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
>  
>         timeout = jiffies + 1;
>         while (!need_resched()) {
> -               if (i915_gem_request_completed(rq, true))
> +               if (i915_gem_request_completed(rq))
>                         return 0;
>  
>                 if (time_after_eq(jiffies, timeout))
> @@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ static int __i915_spin_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
>  
>                 cpu_relax_lowlatency();
>         }
> -       if (i915_gem_request_completed(rq, false))
> +       if (i915_gem_request_completed(rq))
>                 return 0;
>  
>         return -EAGAIN;

.Dave.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-17 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-20 17:48 [RFC 0/4] Convert requests to use struct fence John.C.Harrison
2015-03-20 17:48 ` [RFC 1/4] drm/i915: " John.C.Harrison
2015-04-07  9:18   ` [RFC, " Maarten Lankhorst
2015-04-07 10:59     ` John Harrison
2015-04-07 11:18       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-04-17 19:22         ` Dave Gordon
2015-04-20  5:13           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-03-20 17:48 ` [RFC 2/4] drm/i915: Removed now redudant parameter to i915_gem_request_completed() John.C.Harrison
2015-04-17 18:57   ` Dave Gordon [this message]
2015-03-20 17:48 ` [RFC 3/4] drm/i915: Interrupt driven fences John.C.Harrison
2015-03-20 21:11   ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-23  9:22     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-23 12:13       ` John Harrison
2015-03-26 13:22         ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-26 17:27           ` Jesse Barnes
2015-03-27  8:24             ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-20 17:48 ` [RFC 4/4] drm/i915: Updated request structure tracing John.C.Harrison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55315791.6070904@intel.com \
    --to=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
    --cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox