public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
To: "Deak, Imre" <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i195/bxt: Add A1 stepping for Broxton
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 17:00:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <554A3AA6.5030407@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430842711.21211.76.camel@intel.com>

On 05/05/2015 17:18, Deak, Imre wrote:
> On ti, 2015-05-05 at 15:20 +0100, Nick Hoath wrote:
>> On 29/04/2015 15:35, Deak, Imre wrote:
>>> On pe, 2015-03-20 at 09:29 +0000, Nick Hoath wrote:
>>>> This stepping isn't listed separately in the specs, so needs confirmation.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>> index eec271a..68fb41a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>> @@ -2329,6 +2329,7 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
>>>>    #define SKL_REVID_E0		(0x4)
>>>>
>>>>    #define BXT_REVID_A0		(0x0)
>>>> +#define BXT_REVID_A1		(0x1)
>>>
>>> The above mapping is for the SOC RevID, but I think for all our purposes
>>> (WAs) we should check the GT/Display RevID. The A1 GT/Display RevID
>>> doesn't seem to exist, only A0 is defined with all of 0,1,2 RevIDs
>>> mapping to A0.
>>
>> We use the GT Device2 Revision ID for these comparisons, which does
>> change on each SoC revision. This may map to A0 GT stepping for all the
>> Ax SoCs, according to the specs. However, as this is a naming convention
>> that doesn't affect the code, I suggest we stick to what I have in this
>> patch even if it doesn't 100% reflect what's in the specs.
>
> Not sure about this, as I understand all the workarounds are marked with
> the GT stepping not the SOC stepping, even though the latter is more
> fine-grained. Is there any workarounds for A1? If not I'd suggest adding
> this macro only when we need it.


Agreed, consider this patch currently N/A.

>
> --Imre
>
>>>>    #define BXT_REVID_B0		(0x3)
>>>>    #define BXT_REVID_C0		(0x6)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

      reply	other threads:[~2015-05-06 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-20  9:29 [PATCH] drm/i195/bxt: Add A1 stepping for Broxton Nick Hoath
2015-03-20 17:14 ` shuang.he
2015-03-20 19:17   ` Jesse Barnes
2015-03-21  1:20     ` He, Shuang
2015-04-29 14:35 ` Imre Deak
2015-05-05 14:20   ` Nick Hoath
2015-05-05 16:18     ` Imre Deak
2015-05-06 16:00       ` Nick Hoath [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=554A3AA6.5030407@intel.com \
    --to=nicholas.hoath@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox