From: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com, Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/55] drm/i915: i915_add_request must not fail
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 19:16:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556DF316.4080506@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432917856-12261-4-git-send-email-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On 29/05/2015 17:43, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
>
> The i915_add_request() function is called to keep track of work that has been
> written to the ring buffer. It adds epilogue commands to track progress (seqno
> updates and such), moves the request structure onto the right list and other
> such house keeping tasks. However, the work itself has already been written to
> the ring and will get executed whether or not the add request call succeeds. So
> no matter what goes wrong, there isn't a whole lot of point in failing the call.
>
> At the moment, this is fine(ish). If the add request does bail early on and not
> do the housekeeping, the request will still float around in the
> ring->outstanding_lazy_request field and be picked up next time. It means
> multiple pieces of work will be tagged as the same request and driver can't
> actually wait for the first piece of work until something else has been
> submitted. But it all sort of hangs together.
>
> This patch series is all about removing the OLR and guaranteeing that each piece
> of work gets its own personal request. That means that there is no more
> 'hoovering up of forgotten requests'. If the request does not get tracked then
> it will be leaked. Thus the add request call _must_ not fail. The previous patch
> should have already ensured that it _will_ not fail by removing the potential
> for running out of ring space. This patch enforces the rule by actually removing
> the early exit paths and the return code.
>
> Note that if something does manage to fail and the epilogue commands don't get
> written to the ring, the driver will still hang together. The request will be
> added to the tracking lists. And as in the old case, any subsequent work will
> generate a new seqno which will suffice for marking the old one as complete.
>
> v2: Improved WARNings (Tomas Elf review request).
>
> For: VIZ-5115
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 6 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 43 ++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_render_state.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c | 8 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 8 ++---
> 7 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index eba1857..1be4a52 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2860,9 +2860,9 @@ void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_device *dev);
> void i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(struct drm_device *dev);
> int __must_check i915_gpu_idle(struct drm_device *dev);
> int __must_check i915_gem_suspend(struct drm_device *dev);
> -int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> - struct drm_file *file,
> - struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj);
> +void __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> + struct drm_file *file,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj);
> #define i915_add_request(ring) \
> __i915_add_request(ring, NULL, NULL)
> int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 6f51416..dd39aa5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1155,15 +1155,12 @@ i915_gem_check_wedge(struct i915_gpu_error *error,
> int
> i915_gem_check_olr(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
> {
> - int ret;
> -
> WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&req->ring->dev->struct_mutex));
>
> - ret = 0;
> if (req == req->ring->outstanding_lazy_request)
> - ret = i915_add_request(req->ring);
> + i915_add_request(req->ring);
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
i915_gem_check_olr never returns anything but 0. How about making it void?
Thanks,
Tomas
>
> static void fake_irq(unsigned long data)
> @@ -2466,9 +2463,14 @@ i915_gem_get_seqno(struct drm_device *dev, u32 *seqno)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> - struct drm_file *file,
> - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> +/*
> + * NB: This function is not allowed to fail. Doing so would mean the the
> + * request is not being tracked for completion but the work itself is
> + * going to happen on the hardware. This would be a Bad Thing(tm).
> + */
> +void __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> + struct drm_file *file,
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *request;
> @@ -2478,7 +2480,7 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>
> request = ring->outstanding_lazy_request;
> if (WARN_ON(request == NULL))
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + return;
You have a WARN for the other points of failure in this function, why
not here?
>
> if (i915.enable_execlists) {
> ringbuf = request->ctx->engine[ring->id].ringbuf;
> @@ -2500,15 +2502,12 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> * is that the flush _must_ happen before the next request, no matter
> * what.
> */
> - if (i915.enable_execlists) {
> + if (i915.enable_execlists)
> ret = logical_ring_flush_all_caches(ringbuf, request->ctx);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - } else {
> + else
> ret = intel_ring_flush_all_caches(ring);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
> + /* Not allowed to fail! */
> + WARN(ret, "*_ring_flush_all_caches failed: %d!\n", ret);
>
> /* Record the position of the start of the request so that
> * should we detect the updated seqno part-way through the
> @@ -2517,17 +2516,15 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> */
> request->postfix = intel_ring_get_tail(ringbuf);
>
> - if (i915.enable_execlists) {
> + if (i915.enable_execlists)
> ret = ring->emit_request(ringbuf, request);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - } else {
> + else {
> ret = ring->add_request(ring);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
>
> request->tail = intel_ring_get_tail(ringbuf);
> }
> + /* Not allowed to fail! */
> + WARN(ret, "emit|add_request failed: %d!\n", ret);
>
> request->head = request_start;
>
> @@ -2576,8 +2573,6 @@ int __i915_add_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>
> /* Sanity check that the reserved size was large enough. */
> intel_ring_reserved_space_end(ringbuf);
> -
> - return 0;
> }
>
> static bool i915_context_is_banned(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> index bd0e4bd..2b48a31 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
> @@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands(struct drm_device *dev,
> ring->gpu_caches_dirty = true;
>
> /* Add a breadcrumb for the completion of the batch buffer */
> - (void)__i915_add_request(ring, file, obj);
> + __i915_add_request(ring, file, obj);
> }
>
> static int
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_render_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_render_state.c
> index 521548a..ce4788f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_render_state.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_render_state.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ int i915_gem_render_state_init(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>
> i915_vma_move_to_active(i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt(so.obj), ring);
>
> - ret = __i915_add_request(ring, NULL, so.obj);
> + __i915_add_request(ring, NULL, so.obj);
> /* __i915_add_request moves object to inactive if it fails */
> out:
> i915_gem_render_state_fini(&so);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index e62d396..7a75fc8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1373,7 +1373,7 @@ static int intel_lr_context_render_state_init(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>
> i915_vma_move_to_active(i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt(so.obj), ring);
>
> - ret = __i915_add_request(ring, file, so.obj);
> + __i915_add_request(ring, file, so.obj);
> /* intel_logical_ring_add_request moves object to inactive if it
> * fails */
> out:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> index 25c8ec6..e7534b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
> @@ -220,9 +220,7 @@ static int intel_overlay_do_wait_request(struct intel_overlay *overlay,
> WARN_ON(overlay->last_flip_req);
> i915_gem_request_assign(&overlay->last_flip_req,
> ring->outstanding_lazy_request);
> - ret = i915_add_request(ring);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + i915_add_request(ring);
>
> overlay->flip_tail = tail;
> ret = i915_wait_request(overlay->last_flip_req);
> @@ -291,7 +289,9 @@ static int intel_overlay_continue(struct intel_overlay *overlay,
> WARN_ON(overlay->last_flip_req);
> i915_gem_request_assign(&overlay->last_flip_req,
> ring->outstanding_lazy_request);
> - return i915_add_request(ring);
> + i915_add_request(ring);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void intel_overlay_release_old_vid_tail(struct intel_overlay *overlay)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 74c2222..7061b07 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -2156,14 +2156,10 @@ static int intel_wrap_ring_buffer(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> int intel_ring_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> {
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
> - int ret;
>
> /* We need to add any requests required to flush the objects and ring */
> - if (ring->outstanding_lazy_request) {
> - ret = i915_add_request(ring);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ring->outstanding_lazy_request)
> + i915_add_request(ring);
>
> /* Wait upon the last request to be completed */
> if (list_empty(&ring->request_list))
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-02 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-29 16:43 [PATCH 00/55] Remove the outstanding_lazy_request John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 01/55] drm/i915: Re-instate request->uniq becuase it is extremely useful John.C.Harrison
2015-06-03 11:14 ` Tomas Elf
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 02/55] drm/i915: Reserve ring buffer space for i915_add_request() commands John.C.Harrison
2015-06-02 18:14 ` Tomas Elf
2015-06-04 12:06 ` John.C.Harrison
2015-06-09 16:00 ` Tomas Elf
2015-06-18 12:10 ` John.C.Harrison
2015-06-17 14:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-18 10:43 ` John Harrison
2015-06-19 16:34 ` John.C.Harrison
2015-06-22 20:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-23 11:38 ` John Harrison
2015-06-23 13:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-23 15:43 ` John Harrison
2015-06-23 20:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-24 12:18 ` John Harrison
2015-06-24 12:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-24 17:05 ` John Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 03/55] drm/i915: i915_add_request must not fail John.C.Harrison
2015-06-02 18:16 ` Tomas Elf [this message]
2015-06-04 14:07 ` John Harrison
2015-06-05 10:55 ` Tomas Elf
2015-06-23 10:16 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-23 10:47 ` John Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 04/55] drm/i915: Early alloc request in execbuff John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 05/55] drm/i915: Set context in request from creation even in legacy mode John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 06/55] drm/i915: Merged the many do_execbuf() parameters into a structure John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 07/55] drm/i915: Simplify i915_gem_execbuffer_retire_commands() parameters John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 08/55] drm/i915: Update alloc_request to return the allocated request John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 09/55] drm/i915: Add request to execbuf params and add explicit cleanup John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 10/55] drm/i915: Update the dispatch tracepoint to use params->request John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 11/55] drm/i915: Update move_to_gpu() to take a request structure John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 12/55] drm/i915: Update execbuffer_move_to_active() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 13/55] drm/i915: Add flag to i915_add_request() to skip the cache flush John.C.Harrison
2015-06-02 18:19 ` Tomas Elf
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 14/55] drm/i915: Update i915_gpu_idle() to manage its own request John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 15/55] drm/i915: Split i915_ppgtt_init_hw() in half - generic and per ring John.C.Harrison
2015-06-18 12:11 ` John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 16/55] drm/i915: Moved the for_each_ring loop outside of i915_gem_context_enable() John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 17/55] drm/i915: Don't tag kernel batches as user batches John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 18/55] drm/i915: Add explicit request management to i915_gem_init_hw() John.C.Harrison
2015-06-02 18:20 ` Tomas Elf
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 19/55] drm/i915: Update ppgtt_init_ring() & context_enable() to take requests John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 20/55] drm/i915: Update i915_switch_context() to take a request structure John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 21/55] drm/i915: Update do_switch() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 22/55] drm/i915: Update deferred context creation to do explicit request management John.C.Harrison
2015-06-02 18:22 ` Tomas Elf
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 23/55] drm/i915: Update init_context() to take a request structure John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 24/55] drm/i915: Update render_state_init() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 25/55] drm/i915: Update i915_gem_object_sync() " John.C.Harrison
2015-06-02 18:26 ` Tomas Elf
2015-06-04 12:57 ` John Harrison
2015-06-18 12:14 ` John.C.Harrison
2015-06-18 12:21 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-18 12:59 ` John Harrison
2015-06-18 14:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-18 15:39 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-18 16:16 ` John Harrison
2015-06-22 20:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-22 20:14 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-18 16:36 ` 3.16 backlight kernel options Stéphane ANCELOT
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 26/55] drm/i915: Update overlay code to do explicit request management John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 27/55] drm/i915: Update queue_flip() to take a request structure John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 28/55] drm/i915: Update add_request() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 29/55] drm/i915: Update [vma|object]_move_to_active() to take request structures John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 30/55] drm/i915: Update l3_remap to take a request structure John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 31/55] drm/i915: Update mi_set_context() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 32/55] drm/i915: Update a bunch of execbuffer helpers to take request structures John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 33/55] drm/i915: Update workarounds_emit() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 34/55] drm/i915: Update flush_all_caches() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 35/55] drm/i915: Update switch_mm() to take a request structure John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 36/55] drm/i915: Update ring->flush() to take a requests structure John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 37/55] drm/i915: Update some flush helpers to take request structures John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:43 ` [PATCH 38/55] drm/i915: Update ring->emit_flush() to take a request structure John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 39/55] drm/i915: Update ring->add_request() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 40/55] drm/i915: Update ring->emit_request() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 41/55] drm/i915: Update ring->dispatch_execbuffer() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 42/55] drm/i915: Update ring->emit_bb_start() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 43/55] drm/i915: Update ring->sync_to() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 44/55] drm/i915: Update ring->signal() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 45/55] drm/i915: Update cacheline_align() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 46/55] drm/i915: Update intel_ring_begin() " John.C.Harrison
2015-06-23 10:24 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-23 10:37 ` John Harrison
2015-06-23 13:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-23 15:27 ` John Harrison
2015-06-23 15:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 47/55] drm/i915: Update intel_logical_ring_begin() " John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 48/55] drm/i915: Add *_ring_begin() to request allocation John.C.Harrison
2015-06-17 13:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-17 14:27 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-17 14:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-17 15:52 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-18 11:21 ` John Harrison
2015-06-18 13:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-19 16:34 ` John Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 49/55] drm/i915: Remove the now obsolete intel_ring_get_request() John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 50/55] drm/i915: Remove the now obsolete 'outstanding_lazy_request' John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 51/55] drm/i915: Move the request/file and request/pid association to creation time John.C.Harrison
2015-06-03 11:15 ` Tomas Elf
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 52/55] drm/i915: Remove 'faked' request from LRC submission John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 53/55] drm/i915: Update a bunch of LRC functions to take requests John.C.Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 54/55] drm/i915: Remove the now obsolete 'i915_gem_check_olr()' John.C.Harrison
2015-06-02 18:27 ` Tomas Elf
2015-06-23 10:23 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-23 10:39 ` John Harrison
2015-05-29 16:44 ` [PATCH 55/55] drm/i915: Rename the somewhat reduced i915_gem_object_flush_active() John.C.Harrison
2015-06-02 18:27 ` Tomas Elf
2015-06-17 14:06 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-17 14:21 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-18 11:03 ` John Harrison
2015-06-18 11:10 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-18 11:27 ` John Harrison
2015-06-18 10:57 ` John Harrison
2015-06-04 18:23 ` [PATCH 14/56] drm/i915: Make retire condition check for requests not objects John.C.Harrison
2015-06-04 18:24 ` John Harrison
2015-06-09 15:56 ` Tomas Elf
2015-06-17 15:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-22 21:04 ` [PATCH 00/55] Remove the outstanding_lazy_request Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556DF316.4080506@intel.com \
--to=tomas.elf@intel.com \
--cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox