From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use intel_plane_obj_offset from more places
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557FF7A7.9040105@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150528140937.GH8341@phenom.ffwll.local>
On 05/28/2015 03:09 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:36:54PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:24:40PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:58:30AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 05/27/2015 10:15 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:52:34AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These are the display call sites so should use the proper helper.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also requires intel_plane_obj_offset to assume normal view when
>>>>>> plane pointer is not available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eugh. If only the plane stored the offset, bonus marks for storing the
>>>>> vma cookie, then we would not have to keep recomputing the view and
>>>>> searching every single time...
>>>>
>>>> Well, the patch even decreases the number of searches! :)
>>>>
>>>> And we don't recompute when querying the offset - it just figures out what
>>>> type of vma it should look for. So I think it doesn't prevent any future
>>>> caching improvements. It actually makes it easier since it consolidates the
>>>> query.
>>>>
>>>> I'll need this, or something like it, for some future work. So at the very
>>>> moment I am not too bothered if this goes in or not.
>>>
>>> Yeah unfortunately we can't eliminate the view searches completely since
>>> the view depends upon fb + plane_state. So not perfectly aligned with our
>>> hw ... Otherwise I'd agree, caching the view in the fb would be neat.
>>
>> Not in the fb, in the plane_state. We acquire the vma for the plane
>> during prepare and then we should be using that vma reference for the
>> lifetime of that atomic plane state.
>
> Hm right that should work. And the pin will make sure it won't go poof
> prematurely.
Maybe I could do this, but at the moment I have no idea how that would
work from intelfb_alloc who calls pin_and_fence with no state.
I could keep intel_plan_obj_offsets at all call sites and either return
cached (say plane_state->disp_addr) address or "compute" and cache it,
but, how would I know cached address is valid or not on startup?
I assume plane state is all initialized to zeros? And zero as a display
address is valid AFAIK?
Do we have a intel_plane_state "constructor" somewhere which could set
"intel_plane_state->disp_addr = -1", and so later intel_plane_obj_offset
would know what to do?
And whatever can be done can also be done on top of this patch, which
actually fixes things from the current state.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-16 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-27 9:52 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Only show view type for GGTT VMAs Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-05-27 9:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Show human readable GGTT view name in debugfs Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-05-28 11:11 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-05-28 12:05 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-05-27 9:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use intel_plane_obj_offset from more places Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-05-27 21:15 ` Chris Wilson
2015-05-28 8:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-05-28 12:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-05-28 12:36 ` Chris Wilson
2015-05-28 14:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-16 10:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2015-06-16 11:02 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 11:06 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 11:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-06-16 11:22 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 11:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-06-16 11:48 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 13:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-06-16 13:53 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 15:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-06-16 16:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-17 11:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-05-28 11:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Only show view type for GGTT VMAs Joonas Lahtinen
2015-05-28 11:23 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557FF7A7.9040105@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox