From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use intel_plane_obj_offset from more places
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 12:18:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55800619.2040300@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150616110200.GP28462@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On 06/16/2015 12:02 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:17:11AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 05/28/2015 03:09 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:36:54PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:24:40PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:58:30AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/27/2015 10:15 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:52:34AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>>>>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These are the display call sites so should use the proper helper.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also requires intel_plane_obj_offset to assume normal view when
>>>>>>>> plane pointer is not available.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eugh. If only the plane stored the offset, bonus marks for storing the
>>>>>>> vma cookie, then we would not have to keep recomputing the view and
>>>>>>> searching every single time...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, the patch even decreases the number of searches! :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And we don't recompute when querying the offset - it just figures out what
>>>>>> type of vma it should look for. So I think it doesn't prevent any future
>>>>>> caching improvements. It actually makes it easier since it consolidates the
>>>>>> query.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll need this, or something like it, for some future work. So at the very
>>>>>> moment I am not too bothered if this goes in or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah unfortunately we can't eliminate the view searches completely since
>>>>> the view depends upon fb + plane_state. So not perfectly aligned with our
>>>>> hw ... Otherwise I'd agree, caching the view in the fb would be neat.
>>>>
>>>> Not in the fb, in the plane_state. We acquire the vma for the plane
>>>> during prepare and then we should be using that vma reference for the
>>>> lifetime of that atomic plane state.
>>>
>>> Hm right that should work. And the pin will make sure it won't go poof
>>> prematurely.
>>
>> Maybe I could do this, but at the moment I have no idea how that
>> would work from intelfb_alloc who calls pin_and_fence with no state.
>
> fbdev is a little special. All that we actually require is a plain
> ggtt_pin to ensure that the fb is still around for panics. We can leave
> the plane state in modesetting. We have have full control over the
> struct we associated with the ifbdev, so can easily stash the vma in
> there as well.
What do you mean by "We can leave the plane state in modesetting." ?
Where is the connection between ifbdev and plane state ie. our modeset?
>> I could keep intel_plan_obj_offsets at all call sites and either
>> return cached (say plane_state->disp_addr) address or "compute" and
>> cache it, but, how would I know cached address is valid or not on
>> startup?
>
> They all disappear. Prepare gets the vma, then commit can just use
> vma->node.start + offset (and when the plane_state is released, so is
> the ggtt pinning for the fb).
Yeah they disappear once one figures out how to handle fbdev paths. I am
not there yet. :)
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-16 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-27 9:52 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Only show view type for GGTT VMAs Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-05-27 9:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Show human readable GGTT view name in debugfs Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-05-28 11:11 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-05-28 12:05 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-05-27 9:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Use intel_plane_obj_offset from more places Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-05-27 21:15 ` Chris Wilson
2015-05-28 8:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-05-28 12:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-05-28 12:36 ` Chris Wilson
2015-05-28 14:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-16 10:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-06-16 11:02 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 11:06 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 11:18 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2015-06-16 11:22 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 11:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-06-16 11:48 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 13:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-06-16 13:53 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 15:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-06-16 16:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-17 11:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-05-28 11:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Only show view type for GGTT VMAs Joonas Lahtinen
2015-05-28 11:23 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55800619.2040300@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox