From: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915: Only allow rpm on gen9+ with dmc loaded
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:50:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559F8047.3040604@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436472288-595-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On 7/10/2015 1:34 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Instead of trying to deal with this complexity we'll simply require
> that the dmc firmware is available for runtime pm support. We do that
> by not releasing the rpm reference we acquire when starting the
> firmware loader work. Note that since we hold a rpm reference (and rpm
> get/put is synchronized with its own locking already) there's no need
> for any additional synchronization between the dmc loader and the rpm
> entry/exit code.
>
> Hence we can remove all dmc_load_status_get calls, they don't do
> anything any more.
>
> Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
For BXT, without DMC firmware display engine can goto DC9, so if firmware failed to load then as we are holding rpm reference - it will block dc9 entry.
Do we really want to block dc9 if firmware is not present or failed to load?
Regards,
Animesh
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c | 9 +++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 17 +++--------------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> index 16cd9dae1c1b..03d83892cdb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
> @@ -393,8 +393,11 @@ static void finish_csr_load(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
> out:
> if (fw_loaded)
> intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_INIT);
> - else
> - intel_csr_load_status_set(dev_priv, FW_FAILED);
> +
> + /*
> + * We require the dmc firmware for runtime pm on gen9+ - leak the rpm
> + * reference in case this failed to disable rpm on.
> + */
>
> release_firmware(fw);
> }
> @@ -462,8 +465,6 @@ void intel_csr_ucode_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> void assert_csr_loaded(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - WARN(intel_csr_load_status_get(dev_priv) != FW_LOADED,
> - "CSR is not loaded.\n");
> WARN(!I915_READ(CSR_PROGRAM_BASE),
> "CSR program storage start is NULL\n");
> WARN(!I915_READ(CSR_SSP_BASE), "CSR SSP Base Not fine\n");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 2628b21ff2c0..ed8c0cee738f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -644,21 +644,10 @@ static void skl_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> if ((GEN9_ENABLE_DC5(dev) || SKL_ENABLE_DC6(dev)) &&
> power_well->data == SKL_DISP_PW_2) {
> - enum csr_state state;
> - /* TODO: wait for a completion event or
> - * similar here instead of busy
> - * waiting using wait_for function.
> - */
> - wait_for((state = intel_csr_load_status_get(dev_priv)) !=
> - FW_UNINITIALIZED, 1000);
> - if (state != FW_LOADED)
> - DRM_ERROR("CSR firmware not ready (%d)\n",
> - state);
> + if (SKL_ENABLE_DC6(dev))
> + skl_enable_dc6(dev_priv);
> else
> - if (SKL_ENABLE_DC6(dev))
> - skl_enable_dc6(dev_priv);
> - else
> - gen9_enable_dc5(dev_priv);
> + gen9_enable_dc5(dev_priv);
> }
> }
> }
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 10:19 [PATCH] drm/i915/skl: replace csr_mutex by completion in csr firmware loading Animesh Manna
2015-05-21 12:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-05-21 17:05 ` Animesh Manna
2015-05-21 21:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-04 5:59 ` Sagar Arun Kamble
2015-06-04 14:36 ` Dave Gordon
2015-06-15 10:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-15 18:41 ` Dave Gordon
2015-06-15 10:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-29 8:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-07 12:40 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Resign firmware loading for dmc Animesh Manna
2015-07-07 13:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-08 14:24 ` [PATCH 0/6] Redesign the dmc firmware loading Animesh Manna
2015-07-08 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/gen9: Removed csr-lock and csr-state Animesh Manna
2015-07-09 18:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-08 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/gen9: Added a async work for fw-loading and dc5/dc6 programming Animesh Manna
2015-07-08 14:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/gen9: Replaced request_firmware_nowait() by request_firmware() Animesh Manna
2015-07-09 18:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-08 14:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/gen9: Added dmc_present flag to check firmware loading status Animesh Manna
2015-07-09 18:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-08 14:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/skl: Removed assert for csr-fw-loading during disabling dc6 Animesh Manna
2015-07-08 14:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/gen9: Corrected the sanity check of mmio address range for csr Animesh Manna
2015-07-08 19:39 ` shuang.he
2015-07-09 17:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: use correct power domain for csr loading Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915: Only allow rpm on gen9+ with dmc loaded Daniel Vetter
2015-07-10 8:20 ` Animesh Manna [this message]
2015-07-10 16:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915: move assert_csr_loaded into intel_rpm.c Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Remove csr.state, csr_lock and related code Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915: Align line continuations in intel_csr.c Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915: Simplify csr loading failure printing Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/csr: extract parse_csr_fw Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915: Don't try to load garbage dmc firmware on resume Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915: Use dev_priv in csr functions Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915: Use request_firmware and our own async work Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: Use flush_work to synchronize with dmc loader Daniel Vetter
2015-07-09 20:04 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/csr: Simplify stepping computation Daniel Vetter
2015-07-11 9:22 ` shuang.he
2015-07-10 8:12 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: use correct power domain for csr loading Animesh Manna
2015-07-10 16:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-08 10:31 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Resign firmware loading for dmc shuang.he
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559F8047.3040604@intel.com \
--to=animesh.manna@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox