From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] drm/atomic: Only update crtc->x/y if it's part of the state.
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:17:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A776A9.4000302@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150716091906.GD6223@phenom.ffwll.local>
Op 16-07-15 om 11:19 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:59:14AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
>> index 0898afbc9e23..70e69904291d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
>> @@ -667,8 +667,11 @@ drm_atomic_helper_update_legacy_modeset_state(struct drm_device *dev,
>> for_each_crtc_in_state(old_state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i) {
>> crtc->mode = crtc->state->mode;
>> crtc->enabled = crtc->state->enable;
>> - crtc->x = crtc->primary->state->src_x >> 16;
>> - crtc->y = crtc->primary->state->src_y >> 16;
>> +
>> + if (drm_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(old_state, crtc->primary)) {
>> + crtc->x = crtc->primary->state->src_x >> 16;
>> + crtc->y = crtc->primary->state->src_y >> 16;
>> + }
> What's the benefit here of only updating when something changed? The
> atomic state should be the master source so copying a few too many times
> shouldn't matter really.
Because you might not be holding plane lock, so primary->state may be garbage.
~Maarten
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-16 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 8:59 [PATCH 00/13] Make i915 dpms atomic Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/atomic: Only update crtc->x/y if it's part of the state Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 9:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-16 9:17 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2015-07-16 9:29 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-16 9:38 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 12:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-16 13:44 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 13:51 ` [PATCH v1.1 01/13] drm/atomic: Only update crtc->x/y if it's part of the state, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 14:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/atomic: Update legacy DPMS state during modesets Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 9:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-16 9:24 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 9:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-27 11:04 ` [PATCH v1.1 02/13] drm/atomic: Update legacy DPMS state during modesets, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-27 11:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-27 11:15 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-27 11:24 ` [PATCH v1.2 02/13] drm/atomic: Update legacy DPMS state during modesets, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-27 13:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Make the force_thru workaround atomic Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Remove special dpms handling from intel_crt.c Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Remove special dpms handling from intel_crtc.c Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: Remove special dpms handling from intel_sdvo.c Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Get rid of dpms handling Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Use proper locking for intel_dp_check_link_status Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: Remove some unneeded checks from check_crtc_state Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 9:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-16 9:38 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 15:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-07-16 14:59 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active from state checking Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active from sanitization Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active from intel_dp.c Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 8:59 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active Maarten Lankhorst
2015-07-16 9:52 ` [PATCH 14/13] drm/i915: Only update mode related state if a modeset happened Maarten Lankhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A776A9.4000302@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox