From: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: don't use HPD_PORT_A as an alias for HPD_NONE
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:51:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AE010D.8090400@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437428619-30160-3-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4050 bytes --]
On 7/21/2015 3:13 AM, Imre Deak wrote:
> Currently HPD_PORT_A is used as an alias for HPD_NONE to mean that the
> given port doesn't support long/short HPD pulse detection. SDVO and CRT
> ports are like this and for these ports we only want to know whether an
> hot plug event was detected on the corresponding pin. Since at least on
> BXT we need long/short pulse detection on PORT A as well (added by the
> next patch) remove this aliasing of HPD_PORT_A/HPD_NONE and let the
> return value of intel_hpd_pin_to_port() show whether long/short pulse
> detection is supported on the passed in pin.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 78d6c7a..ebfd5a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -206,11 +206,11 @@ enum intel_display_power_domain {
>
> enum hpd_pin {
> HPD_NONE = 0,
> - HPD_PORT_A = HPD_NONE, /* PORT_A is internal */
> HPD_TV = HPD_NONE, /* TV is known to be unreliable */
> HPD_CRT,
> HPD_SDVO_B,
> HPD_SDVO_C,
> + HPD_PORT_A,
> HPD_PORT_B,
> HPD_PORT_C,
> HPD_PORT_D,
> @@ -2627,7 +2627,7 @@ void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev, u32 pin_mask, u32 long_mask);
> void intel_hpd_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_hpd_init_work(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void intel_hpd_cancel_work(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> -enum port intel_hpd_pin_to_port(enum hpd_pin pin);
> +bool intel_hpd_pin_to_port(enum hpd_pin pin, enum port *port);
>
> /* i915_irq.c */
> void i915_queue_hangcheck(struct drm_device *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 306de78..4ad7a31 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1276,8 +1276,8 @@ static void intel_get_hpd_pins(u32 *pin_mask, u32 *long_mask,
>
> *pin_mask |= BIT(i);
>
> - port = intel_hpd_pin_to_port(i);
> - if (long_pulse_detect(port, dig_hotplug_reg))
> + if (intel_hpd_pin_to_port(i, &port) &&
> + long_pulse_detect(port, dig_hotplug_reg))
> *long_mask |= BIT(i);
> }
feel that this could be more readable when split it to two conditions ?
if (intel_hpd_pin_to_port(i, &port) == false)
continue;
if (long_pulse_detect(port, dig_hotplug_reg)
*long_mask |= BIT(i);
other than this, this change looks good.
Reviewed-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c
> index 3c53aac..8cda7b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hotplug.c
> @@ -29,17 +29,23 @@
> #include "i915_drv.h"
> #include "intel_drv.h"
>
> -enum port intel_hpd_pin_to_port(enum hpd_pin pin)
> +bool intel_hpd_pin_to_port(enum hpd_pin pin, enum port *port)
> {
> switch (pin) {
> + case HPD_PORT_A:
> + *port = PORT_A;
> + return true;
> case HPD_PORT_B:
> - return PORT_B;
> + *port = PORT_B;
> + return true;
> case HPD_PORT_C:
> - return PORT_C;
> + *port = PORT_C;
> + return true;
> case HPD_PORT_D:
> - return PORT_D;
> + *port = PORT_D;
> + return true;
> default:
> - return PORT_A; /* no hpd */
> + return false; /* no hpd */
> }
> }
>
> @@ -322,8 +328,8 @@ void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev,
> if (!(BIT(i) & pin_mask))
> continue;
>
> - port = intel_hpd_pin_to_port(i);
> - is_dig_port = port && dev_priv->hotplug.irq_port[port];
> + is_dig_port = intel_hpd_pin_to_port(i, &port) &&
> + dev_priv->hotplug.irq_port[port];
>
> if (is_dig_port) {
> bool long_hpd = long_mask & BIT(i);
--
regards,
Sivakumar
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5062 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-21 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-20 21:43 [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/bxt: HPD long/short pulse detect support on port A Imre Deak
2015-07-20 21:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: combine i9xx_get_hpd_pins and pch_get_hpd_pins Imre Deak
2015-07-21 8:20 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-07-21 17:58 ` Imre Deak
2015-07-22 8:13 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-07-21 22:32 ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2015-07-22 8:16 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-07-20 21:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: don't use HPD_PORT_A as an alias for HPD_NONE Imre Deak
2015-07-21 8:21 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani [this message]
2015-07-21 18:03 ` Imre Deak
2015-07-21 22:32 ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2015-07-22 8:28 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-07-20 21:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/bxt: add support for HPD long/short pulse detection on HPD_PORT_A pin Imre Deak
2015-07-22 8:31 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-07-21 6:10 ` [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/bxt: HPD long/short pulse detect support on port A Jindal, Sonika
2015-07-21 17:42 ` Imre Deak
2015-07-22 8:45 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55AE010D.8090400@intel.com \
--to=sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox