From: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/19] drm/i915: Wa32bitGeneralStateOffset & Wa32bitInstructionBaseOffset
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:53:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B645EA.2000907@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150727144655.GA5963@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On 7/27/2015 3:46 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 08:04:50PM +0530, Goel, Akash wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/16/2015 3:03 PM, Michel Thierry wrote:
>>> There are some allocations that must be only referenced by 32-bit
>>> offsets. To limit the chances of having the first 4GB already full,
>>> objects not requiring this workaround use DRM_MM_SEARCH_BELOW/
>>> DRM_MM_CREATE_TOP flags
>>>
>>> In specific, any resource used with flat/heapless (0x00000000-0xfffff000)
>>> General State Heap (GSH) or Instruction State Heap (ISH) must be in a
>>> 32-bit range, because the General State Offset and Instruction State
>>> Offset are limited to 32-bits.
>>>
>>> Objects must have EXEC_OBJECT_SUPPORTS_48B_ADDRESS flag to indicate if
>>> they can be allocated above the 32-bit address range. To limit the
>>> chances of having the first 4GB already full, objects will use
>>> DRM_MM_SEARCH_BELOW + DRM_MM_CREATE_TOP flags when possible.
>>>
>>> v2: Changed flag logic from neeeds_32b, to supports_48b.
>>> v3: Moved 48-bit support flag back to exec_object. (Chris, Daniel)
>>> v4: Split pin flags into PIN_ZONE_4G and PIN_HIGH; update PIN_OFFSET_MASK
>>> to use last PIN_ defined instead of hard-coded value; use correct limit
>>> check in eb_vma_misplaced. (Chris)
>>> v5: Don't touch PIN_OFFSET_MASK and update workaround comment (Chris)
>>> v6: Apply pin-high for ggtt too (Chris)
>>>
>>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v4)
>>> Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 3 ++-
>>> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> index 1dbbbf0..f79cc7b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>> @@ -2771,6 +2771,8 @@ void i915_gem_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma);
>>> #define PIN_OFFSET_BIAS (1<<3)
>>> #define PIN_USER (1<<4)
>>> #define PIN_UPDATE (1<<5)
>>> +#define PIN_ZONE_4G (1<<6)
>>> +#define PIN_HIGH (1<<7)
>>> #define PIN_OFFSET_MASK (~4095)
>>> int __must_check
>>> i915_gem_object_pin(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>>> index 76b7612..cd7e4b6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>>> @@ -3728,6 +3728,8 @@ i915_gem_object_bind_to_vm(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>> u32 fence_alignment, unfenced_alignment;
>>> u64 size, fence_size;
>>> + u32 search_flag = DRM_MM_SEARCH_DEFAULT;
>>> + u32 alloc_flag = DRM_MM_CREATE_DEFAULT;
>>> u64 start =
>>> flags & PIN_OFFSET_BIAS ? flags & PIN_OFFSET_MASK : 0;
>>> u64 end =
>>> @@ -3771,6 +3773,14 @@ i915_gem_object_bind_to_vm(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>>> size = flags & PIN_MAPPABLE ? fence_size : obj->base.size;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (flags & PIN_HIGH) {
>>> + search_flag = DRM_MM_SEARCH_BELOW;
>>> + alloc_flag = DRM_MM_CREATE_TOP;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (flags & PIN_ZONE_4G)
>>> + end = (1ULL << 32);
>>
>> Would this be fine for platforms, where only 2 GB of GGTT space is
>> available ? For GEN7 & older platforms, only GGTT would be used.
>> Shouldn't this check for PIN_ZONE_4G flag, be done only for PPGTT vm ?
>> For GGTT we have to obey the PIN_MAPPABLE flag, if set then 'end'
>> will be 256 MB.
>> If both PIN_MAPPABLE & PIN_ZONE_4G flags are set, the 'end' should
>> still be 256 MB, for GGTT vm.
>> So we need to mindful in defining the 'end' for platforms where
>> only GGTT would be used.
>
> Ah, indeed. I didn't notice since this is end = min(end, 1<<32) in my
> tree.
Thanks, I'll resend with this fix.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 9:33 [PATCH v5 00/19] 48-bit PPGTT Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 01/19] drm/i915: Remove unnecessary gen8_clamp_pd Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 02/19] drm/i915/gen8: Make pdp allocation more dynamic Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 03/19] drm/i915/gen8: Abstract PDP usage Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 04/19] drm/i915/gen8: Add dynamic page trace events Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 05/19] drm/i915/gen8: Add PML4 structure Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 06/19] drm/i915/gen8: implement alloc/free for 4lvl Michel Thierry
2015-07-29 14:34 ` Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 07/19] drm/i915/gen8: Add 4 level switching infrastructure and lrc support Michel Thierry
2015-07-29 14:34 ` Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 08/19] drm/i915/gen8: Generalize PTE writing for GEN8 PPGTT Michel Thierry
2015-07-29 14:35 ` Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 09/19] drm/i915/gen8: Pass sg_iter through pte inserts Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 10/19] drm/i915/gen8: Add 4 level support in insert_entries and clear_range Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 11/19] drm/i915/gen8: Initialize PDPs Michel Thierry
2015-07-29 14:35 ` Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 12/19] drm/i915: Expand error state's address width to 64b Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 13/19] drm/i915/gen8: Add ppgtt info and debug_dump Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 14/19] drm/i915: object size needs to be u64 Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 15/19] drm/i915: batch_obj vm offset must " Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 16/19] drm/i915/userptr: Kill user_size limit check Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 17/19] drm/i915: Wa32bitGeneralStateOffset & Wa32bitInstructionBaseOffset Michel Thierry
2015-07-27 14:34 ` Goel, Akash
2015-07-27 14:46 ` Chris Wilson
2015-07-27 14:53 ` Michel Thierry [this message]
2015-07-27 21:11 ` Chris Wilson
2015-07-28 11:12 ` Michel Thierry
2015-07-28 14:43 ` Chris Wilson
2015-07-29 11:05 ` Michel Thierry
2015-07-29 11:17 ` Chris Wilson
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 18/19] drm/i915/gen8: Flip the 48b switch Michel Thierry
2015-07-16 9:33 ` [PATCH v5 19/19] drm/i915: Save some page table setup on repeated binds Michel Thierry
2015-07-28 12:18 ` [PATCH v5 00/19] 48-bit PPGTT Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B645EA.2000907@intel.com \
--to=michel.thierry@intel.com \
--cc=akash.goel@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox