public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/13] drm/i915: Only update mode related state if a modeset happened.
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 16:06:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C36A02.3010600@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150806131229.GO17734@phenom.ffwll.local>

Op 06-08-15 om 15:12 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:37:10PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> The rest will be a noop anyway, since without modeset there will be
>> no updated dplls and no modeset state to update.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 30 +++++++-----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 1fd8b7dec7da..aa444cbc2262 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -12181,33 +12181,15 @@ fail:
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static bool intel_crtc_in_use(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>> -{
>> -	struct drm_encoder *encoder;
>> -	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
>> -
>> -	list_for_each_entry(encoder, &dev->mode_config.encoder_list, head)
>> -		if (encoder->crtc == crtc)
>> -			return true;
>> -
>> -	return false;
>> -}
>> -
>>  static void
>> -intel_modeset_update_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>> +intel_modeset_update_crtc_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>>  {
>>  	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>>  	struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>>  	int i;
>>  
>> -	intel_shared_dpll_commit(state);
> This should be right next to swap_state, and we should probably rename it
> to be consistent.
After some digging I think this could work if we no longer check pll->config.crtc_mask
in intel_disable_shared_dpll.

If we check crtc_mask in intel_enable_shared_dpll we can remove the one from disable
and prepare, and let the hw checker deal with it.
>> -
>> -	drm_atomic_helper_update_legacy_modeset_state(state->dev, state);
> This helper should always work, why try to optimize things?
I didn't see the point of going through the connector state,
but shrug I guess the extra loops probably don't matter.
>> -
>>  	/* Double check state. */
>>  	for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
>> -		WARN_ON(crtc->state->enable != intel_crtc_in_use(crtc));
> I guess this WARN_ON should be moved into the state checker? Or entirely
> removed if redundant.
It's removed because the atomic core does this for us.
>> -
>>  		to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
>>  
>>  		/* Update hwmode for vblank functions */
>> @@ -13110,12 +13092,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
>>  
>>  	/* Only after disabling all output pipelines that will be changed can we
>>  	 * update the the output configuration. */
>> -	intel_modeset_update_state(state);
>> +	intel_modeset_update_crtc_state(state);
>>  
>> -	/* The state has been swaped above, so state actually contains the
>> -	 * old state now. */
>> -	if (any_ms)
>> +	if (any_ms) {
>> +		intel_shared_dpll_commit(state);
>> +
>> +		drm_atomic_helper_update_legacy_modeset_state(state->dev, state);
>>  		modeset_update_crtc_power_domains(state);
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	/* Now enable the clocks, plane, pipe, and connectors that we set up. */
>>  	for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
>> -- 
>> 2.1.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-06 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-05 10:36 [PATCH v3 00/13] DPMS updates and atomic state checking Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-05 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] drm/i915: Make the force_thru workaround atomic, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-05 14:03   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] drm/i915: Validate the state after an atomic modeset only, and pass the state Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] drm/i915: Update atomic state when removing mst connector Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-06 11:47   ` [PATCH v3.1 1/3] drm/i915: Fix broken mst get_hw_state Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-06 11:47     ` [PATCH v3.1 2/3] drm/i915: Update atomic state when removing mst connector, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-06 12:30       ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-08-06 11:47     ` [PATCH v3.1 3/3] drm/i915: Don't try to remove MST cleanly when force removed Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-06 13:01       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-06 13:51         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-06 15:45           ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-06 12:59     ` [PATCH v3.1 1/3] drm/i915: Fix broken mst get_hw_state Daniel Vetter
2015-08-06 13:37       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-06 15:58         ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/i915: Convert connector checking to atomic, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-06 11:49   ` [PATCH v3.1 04/13] drm/i915: Convert connector checking to atomic, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] drm/i915: Remove some unneeded checks from check_crtc_state Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active from state checking Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] drm/i915: Make crtc checking use the atomic state, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] drm/i915: Get rid of dpms handling Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active from sanitization, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active from intel_dp.c, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] drm/i915: Remove connectors_active Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] drm/i915: Only update mode related state if a modeset happened Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-06 13:12   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-06 14:06     ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2015-08-06 16:01       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-05 10:37 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] drm/i915: Handle return value in intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-08-11 22:17   ` shuang.he
2015-08-06 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] DPMS updates and atomic state checking Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55C36A02.3010600@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox