Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix checksum write for automated test reply

Daniel Vetter
2015-07-22T11:57:39Z

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:36:48PM +0530, Sivakumar Thulasimani wrote:
> From: "Thulasimani,Sivakumar" <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
>
> DP spec requires the checksum of the last block read to be written
> when replying to TEST_EDID_READ. This patch fixes the current code
> to do the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index f1b9f93..9617d04 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4090,9 +4090,18 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> intel_dp->aux.i2c_defer_count);
> intel_dp->compliance_test_data = INTEL_DP_RESOLUTION_FAILSAFE;
> } else {
> + struct edid *block = intel_connector->detect_edid;
> + uint8_t temp = intel_connector->detect_edid->extensions;
> +
> + /* We have to write the checksum
> + * of the last block read
> + */
> + while (temp--)
> + block++;

block += block->extensions;

instead of implementing addition by adding lots of 1? Also if you want to
simplify computation by extracting local variables, give them a better
name than "temp". That's somewhat ok for a reused u32 tmp for register
read-modify-writes over lots of registers, but not really for anything
else.
-Daniel

> +
> if (!drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
> DP_TEST_EDID_CHECKSUM,
> - &intel_connector->detect_edid->checksum,
> + &block->checksum,
> 1))
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to write EDID checksum\n");
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation