From: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915: add common intel_digital_port_connected function
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:42:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55DEC65A.4070805@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737z5xifl.fsf@intel.com>
On 8/27/2015 1:38 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 8/27/2015 12:30 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/20/2015 1:17 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>>> Add a common intel_digital_port_connected() that splits out to functions
>>>>> for different platforms. No functional changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> v2: make the function return a boolean
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>>>> index f08859471841..f947951a01d4 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>>>> @@ -4473,13 +4473,6 @@ edp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>>> return status;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> -/*
>>>>> - * ibx_digital_port_connected - is the specified port connected?
>>>>> - * @dev_priv: i915 private structure
>>>>> - * @port: the port to test
>>>>> - *
>>>>> - * Returns true if @port is connected, false otherwise.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> static bool ibx_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>>>> struct intel_digital_port *port)
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -4524,13 +4517,12 @@ static bool ibx_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>>>> return I915_READ(SDEISR) & bit;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> -static bool g4x_digital_port_connected(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>>> +static bool g4x_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>>>> struct intel_digital_port *port)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>>>> uint32_t bit;
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
>>>>> + if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
>>>> this might not work :(. just noted this as part of another review.
>>>> please fix this since
>>>> it is merged.
>>> Sorry, what might not work?
>>>
>>> Jani.
>> - if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev)) {
>> + if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv)) { <----- dev_priv is used instead of dev
>> should be IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev)
> Ah, that may be confusing. We're transitioning towards preferring
> dev_priv, and instead of switching everything at once (which would not
> work) Chris put together some magic to have these macros accept either
> drm_i915_private or drm_device pointer. See __I915__ in i915_drv.h.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
sorry, missed that part :(.
>
>>>>> switch (port->port) {
>>>>> case PORT_B:
>>>>> bit = PORTB_HOTPLUG_LIVE_STATUS_VLV;
>>>>> @@ -4565,6 +4557,22 @@ static bool g4x_digital_port_connected(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>>> return I915_READ(PORT_HOTPLUG_STAT) & bit;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * intel_digital_port_connected - is the specified port connected?
>>>>> + * @dev_priv: i915 private structure
>>>>> + * @port: the port to test
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Return %true if @port is connected, %false otherwise.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static bool intel_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>>>> + struct intel_digital_port *port)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
>>>>> + return ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + return g4x_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> static enum drm_connector_status
>>>>> ironlake_dp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -4572,7 +4580,7 @@ ironlake_dp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>>>> struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (!ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port))
>>>>> + if (!intel_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port))
>>>>> return connector_status_disconnected;
>>>>>
>>>>> return intel_dp_detect_dpcd(intel_dp);
>>>>> @@ -4594,7 +4602,7 @@ g4x_dp_detect(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>>> return status;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (!g4x_digital_port_connected(dev, intel_dig_port))
>>>>> + if (!intel_digital_port_connected(dev->dev_private, intel_dig_port))
>>>>> return connector_status_disconnected;
>>>>>
>>>>> return intel_dp_detect_dpcd(intel_dp);
>>>>> @@ -5057,13 +5065,8 @@ intel_dp_hpd_pulse(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, bool long_hpd)
>>>>> /* indicate that we need to restart link training */
>>>>> intel_dp->train_set_valid = false;
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
>>>>> - if (!ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port))
>>>>> - goto mst_fail;
>>>>> - } else {
>>>>> - if (!g4x_digital_port_connected(dev, intel_dig_port))
>>>>> - goto mst_fail;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + if (!intel_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, intel_dig_port))
>>>>> + goto mst_fail;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (!intel_dp_get_dpcd(intel_dp)) {
>>>>> goto mst_fail;
>>>> --
>>>> regards,
>>>> Sivakumar
>>>>
>> --
>> regards,
>> Sivakumar
>>
--
regards,
Sivakumar
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-27 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 7:47 [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/i915: clean up *_digital_port_connected Jani Nikula
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/i915: move ibx_digital_port_connected to intel_dp.c Jani Nikula
2015-08-26 5:04 ` Jindal, Sonika
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/i915: make g4x_digital_port_connected return boolean status Jani Nikula
2015-08-20 8:17 ` R, Durgadoss
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/i915: add MISSING_CASE annotation to ibx_digital_port_connected Jani Nikula
2015-08-20 14:26 ` R, Durgadoss
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915: add common intel_digital_port_connected function Jani Nikula
2015-08-26 5:26 ` Jindal, Sonika
2015-08-26 15:18 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-08-27 7:00 ` Jani Nikula
2015-08-27 8:01 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2015-08-27 8:08 ` Jani Nikula
2015-08-27 8:12 ` Sivakumar Thulasimani [this message]
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/i915: split ibx_digital_port_connected to ibx and cpt variants Jani Nikula
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/i915: split g4x_digital_port_connected to g4x and vlv variants Jani Nikula
2015-08-20 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/i915/bxt: Use correct live status register for BXT platform Jani Nikula
2015-08-26 5:32 ` Jindal, Sonika
2015-08-26 6:35 ` Jani Nikula
2015-08-26 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/i915: clean up *_digital_port_connected Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55DEC65A.4070805@intel.com \
--to=sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox