From: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>
To: "Łukasz Daniluk" <lukasz.daniluk@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/bdw: Check for slice, subslice and EU count for BDW
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:08:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E710E1.3010107@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441208878-8853-1-git-send-email-lukasz.daniluk@intel.com>
On 02/09/2015 16:47, Łukasz Daniluk wrote:
> Added checks for available slices, subslices and EUs for Broadwell. This
> information is filled in intel_device_info and is available to user with
> GET_PARAM.
> Added checks for enabled slices, subslices and EU for Broadwell. This
> information is based on available counts but takes power gated slices
> into account. It can be read in debugfs.
> Introduce new register defines that contain information on slices on
> Broadwell.
>
> v2:
> - Introduce GT_SLICE_INFO register
> - Change Broadwell sseu_device_status function to use GT_SLICE_INFO
> register instead of RPCS register
> - Undo removal of dev_priv variables in Cherryview and Gen9
> sseu_device_satus functions
>
> Cc: Jeff Mcgee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Łukasz Daniluk <lukasz.daniluk@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 29 +++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 22 ++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 23a69307..e8a62ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -4932,13 +4932,38 @@ static void gen9_sseu_device_status(struct drm_device *dev,
> }
> }
>
> +static void broadwell_sseu_device_status(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct sseu_dev_status *stat)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + int s;
> + u32 slice_info = I915_READ(GEN8_GT_SLICE_INFO);
I don't see this register (0x138064 as defined below) in bdw spec.
> +
> + stat->slice_total =
> + hweight32(slice_info & GEN8_LSLICESTAT_MASK);
why not in a single line, seems to fit under 80 chars.
> +
> + if (stat->slice_total)
> + {
> + stat->subslice_per_slice = INTEL_INFO(dev)->subslice_per_slice;
> + stat->eu_per_subslice = INTEL_INFO(dev)->eu_per_subslice;
> + stat->subslice_total = stat->slice_total * stat->subslice_per_slice;
> + stat->eu_total = stat->eu_per_subslice * stat->subslice_total;
> +
Please reorder such that all subslice values are populated first
followed by EUs to follow an order.
> + /* subtract fused off EU(s) from enabled slice(s) */
> + for (s = 0; s < stat->slice_total; s++) {
> + u8 subslice_7eu = INTEL_INFO(dev)->subslice_7eu[s];
> + stat->eu_total -= hweight8(subslice_7eu);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int i915_sseu_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> {
> struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private;
> struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev;
> struct sseu_dev_status stat;
>
> - if ((INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 8) || IS_BROADWELL(dev))
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 8)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> seq_puts(m, "SSEU Device Info\n");
> @@ -4963,6 +4988,8 @@ static int i915_sseu_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> memset(&stat, 0, sizeof(stat));
> if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev)) {
> cherryview_sseu_device_status(dev, &stat);
> + } else if (IS_BROADWELL(dev)) {
> + broadwell_sseu_device_status(dev, &stat);
> } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) {
> gen9_sseu_device_status(dev, &stat);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> index ab37d11..2d52b1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> @@ -705,6 +705,93 @@ static void gen9_sseu_info_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> info->has_eu_pg = (info->eu_per_subslice > 2);
> }
>
> +static void broadwell_sseu_info_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct intel_device_info *info;
> + const int s_max = 3, ss_max = 3, eu_max = 8;
I only see max of 2 slices for bdw in spec.
> + int s, ss;
> + u32 fuse2, eu_disable[s_max], s_enable, ss_disable;
> +
> + fuse2 = I915_READ(GEN8_FUSE2);
> + s_enable = (fuse2 & GEN8_F2_S_ENA_MASK) >>
> + GEN8_F2_S_ENA_SHIFT;
> + ss_disable = (fuse2 & GEN8_F2_SS_DIS_MASK) >>
> + GEN8_F2_SS_DIS_SHIFT;
> +
> + eu_disable[0] = I915_READ(GEN8_EU_DISABLE0) &
> + GEN8_EU_DIS0_S0_MASK;
> + eu_disable[1] = (I915_READ(GEN8_EU_DISABLE0) >>
> + GEN8_EU_DIS0_S1_SHIFT) |
> + ((I915_READ(GEN8_EU_DISABLE1) &
> + GEN8_EU_DIS1_S1_MASK) <<
> + (32 - GEN8_EU_DIS0_S1_SHIFT));
> + eu_disable[2] = (I915_READ(GEN8_EU_DISABLE1) >>
> + GEN8_EU_DIS1_S2_SHIFT) |
> + ((I915_READ(GEN8_EU_DISABLE2) &
> + GEN8_EU_DIS2_S2_MASK) <<
> + (32 - GEN8_EU_DIS1_S2_SHIFT));
> +
GEN9_EU_DISABLE(slice) is already available, since the register
addresses are same maybe it can be reused after renaming it to GEN8
instead of creating new definitions? ofcourse shift/mask are different.
Indentation is off, in general please use () to force indentation.
first two statements can fit in single line.
regards
Arun
> +
> + info = (struct intel_device_info *)&dev_priv->info;
> + info->slice_total = hweight32(s_enable);
> +
> + /*
> + * The subslice disable field is global, i.e. it applies
> + * to each of the enabled slices.
> + */
> + info->subslice_per_slice = ss_max - hweight32(ss_disable);
> + info->subslice_total = info->slice_total *
> + info->subslice_per_slice;
> +
> + /*
> + * Iterate through enabled slices and subslices to
> + * count the total enabled EU.
> + */
> + for (s = 0; s < s_max; s++) {
> + if (!(s_enable & (0x1 << s)))
> + /* skip disabled slice */
> + continue;
> +
> + for (ss = 0; ss < ss_max; ss++) {
> + u32 n_disabled;
> +
> + if (ss_disable & (0x1 << ss))
> + /* skip disabled subslice */
> + continue;
> +
> + n_disabled = hweight8(eu_disable[s] >>
> + (ss * eu_max));
> +
> + /*
> + * Record which subslice(s) has(have) 7 EUs. we
> + * can tune the hash used to spread work among
> + * subslices if they are unbalanced.
> + */
> + if (eu_max - n_disabled == 7)
> + info->subslice_7eu[s] |= 1 << ss;
> +
> + info->eu_total += eu_max - n_disabled;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * BDW is expected to always have a uniform distribution of EU across
> + * subslices with the exception that any one EU in any one subslice may
> + * be fused off for die recovery.
> + */
> + info->eu_per_subslice = info->subslice_total ?
> + DIV_ROUND_UP(info->eu_total, info->subslice_total) : 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * BDW supports slice power gating on devices with more than
> + * one slice.
> + */
> + info->has_slice_pg = (info->slice_total > 1);
> + info->has_subslice_pg = 0;
> + info->has_eu_pg = 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Determine various intel_device_info fields at runtime.
> *
> @@ -775,6 +862,8 @@ static void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> /* Initialize slice/subslice/EU info */
> if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev))
> cherryview_sseu_info_init(dev);
> + else if (IS_BROADWELL(dev))
> + broadwell_sseu_info_init(dev);
> else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)
> gen9_sseu_info_init(dev);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index be87e3b..37f658f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -1841,11 +1841,26 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> #define CHV_FGT_EU_DIS_SS1_R1_MASK (0xf << CHV_FGT_EU_DIS_SS1_R1_SHIFT)
>
> #define GEN8_FUSE2 0x9120
> +#define GEN8_F2_SS_DIS_SHIFT 21
> +#define GEN8_F2_SS_DIS_MASK (0x7 << GEN8_F2_SS_DIS_SHIFT)
> #define GEN8_F2_S_ENA_SHIFT 25
> #define GEN8_F2_S_ENA_MASK (0x7 << GEN8_F2_S_ENA_SHIFT)
>
> -#define GEN9_F2_SS_DIS_SHIFT 20
> -#define GEN9_F2_SS_DIS_MASK (0xf << GEN9_F2_SS_DIS_SHIFT)
> +#define GEN8_EU_DISABLE0 0x9134
> +#define GEN8_EU_DIS0_S0_MASK 0xffffff
> +#define GEN8_EU_DIS0_S1_SHIFT 24
> +#define GEN8_EU_DIS0_S1_MASK (0xff << GEN8_EU_DIS0_S1_SHIFT)
> +
> +#define GEN8_EU_DISABLE1 0x9138
> +#define GEN8_EU_DIS1_S1_MASK 0xffff
> +#define GEN8_EU_DIS1_S2_SHIFT 16
> +#define GEN8_EU_DIS1_S2_MASK (0xffff << GEN8_EU_DIS1_S2_SHIFT)
> +
> +#define GEN8_EU_DISABLE2 0x913c
> +#define GEN8_EU_DIS2_S2_MASK 0xff
> +
> +#define GEN9_F2_SS_DIS_SHIFT 20
> +#define GEN9_F2_SS_DIS_MASK (0xf << GEN9_F2_SS_DIS_SHIFT)
>
> #define GEN9_EU_DISABLE(slice) (0x9134 + (slice)*0x4)
>
> @@ -6822,6 +6837,9 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
> #define GEN6_RC6 3
> #define GEN6_RC7 4
>
> +#define GEN8_GT_SLICE_INFO 0x138064
> +#define GEN8_LSLICESTAT_MASK 0x7
> +
> #define CHV_POWER_SS0_SIG1 0xa720
> #define CHV_POWER_SS1_SIG1 0xa728
> #define CHV_SS_PG_ENABLE (1<<1)
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-02 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-13 12:38 [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Check for slice, subslice and EU count for BDW Łukasz Daniluk
2015-08-13 21:34 ` Bish, Jim
2015-08-14 0:11 ` Jeff McGee
2015-09-02 15:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Łukasz Daniluk
2015-09-02 14:03 ` Chris Wilson
2015-09-08 11:29 ` Daniluk, Lukasz
2015-09-02 15:08 ` Arun Siluvery [this message]
2015-09-08 12:53 ` Daniluk, Lukasz
2015-09-08 15:15 ` Arun Siluvery
2015-09-17 11:51 ` [PATCH v3] " Łukasz Daniluk
2015-09-17 14:40 ` Jeff McGee
2015-09-25 9:54 ` [PATCH v4] " Łukasz Daniluk
2015-09-29 19:58 ` Jeff McGee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E710E1.3010107@linux.intel.com \
--to=arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lukasz.daniluk@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox