intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [DMC_BUGFIX_SKL_V2 1/5] drm/i915/skl: Added a check for the hardware status of csr fw before loading.
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:36:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F1D4B0.7050104@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150910144527.GY2767@phenom.ffwll.local>



On 9/10/2015 8:15 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:58:54AM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
>>
>> On 9/2/2015 2:24 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:40:54PM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
>>>> On 8/26/2015 6:40 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 01:36:05AM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
>>>>>> Dmc will restore the csr program except DC9, cold boot,
>>>>>> warm reset, PCI function level reset, and hibernate/suspend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> intel_csr_load_program() function is used to load the firmware
>>>>>> data from kernel memory to csr address space.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All values of csr address space will be zero if it got reset and
>>>>>> the first byte of csr program is always a non-zero if firmware
>>>>>> is loaded successfuly. Based on hardware status will load the
>>>>>> firmware.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Without this condition check if we overwrite the firmware data the
>>>>>> counters exposed for dc5/dc6 (help for debugging) will be nullified.
>>>> Bacause of the above reason mentioned just above we need to block firmware loading again.
>>>> So only WARN_ON will not help.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> v1: Initial version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v2: Based on review comments from Daniel,
>>>>>> - Added a check to know hardware status and load the firmware if not loaded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c | 9 +++++++++
>>>>>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
>>>>>> index ba1ae03..682cc26 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
>>>>>> @@ -252,6 +252,15 @@ void intel_csr_load_program(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>>>>   		return;
>>>>>>   	}
>>>>>> +	/*
>>>>>> +	 * Dmc will restore the csr the program except DC9, cold boot,
>>>>>> +	 * warm reset, PCI function level reset, and hibernate/suspend.
>>>>>> +	 * This condition will help to check if csr address space is reset/
>>>>>> +	 * not loaded.
>>>>>> +	 */
>>>>> Atm we call this from driver load and resume, which doesn seem to cover
>>>>> all the cases you mention in the comment. Should this be a WARN_ON
>>>>> instead? Or do we have troubles in our init sequence where we load too
>>>>> many times?
>>>> Yes, the above statement taken from bspec to describe about the special cases dmc will not restore the firmware.
>>>> Agree, In our cases cold boot and hibernate/suspend mainly we need to load the firmware again, so in my
>>>> second sentence I wanted to comment mainly regarding this condition check added for suspend-hibernate(reset)
>>>> and cold boot(not loaded).
>>>>
>>>> Anyways the same api later can be used to load the firmware from anywhere, so my intention to check firmware loaded or not.
>>>> If already loaded then not to overwrite the csr address space to maintain the dc5/dc6 counter value.
>>>>
>>>> Can the below comment more clear to you.
>>>>
>>>> 	/*
>>>> 	 * Dmc will restore the csr the program except DC9, cold boot,
>>>> 	 * warm reset, PCI function level reset, and hibernate/suspend.
>>>> 	 * If firmware is restored by dmc then no need to load again which
>>>> 	 * will keep the dc5/dc6 counter exposed by firmware.
>>>> 	 */
>>>>
>>>> No issue in init sequence.
>>> That seems to still cover all the callers of the function afaics - we do
>>> pci resets over suspend resume unconditionally. So I still don't
>>> understand where exactly we try to load the dmc firmware in i915.ko when
>>> it's already loaded.
>> During resume intel_csr_load_program() will be called from
>> intel_runtime_resume().
>>
>> intel_runtime_resume()-> skl_resume_prepare()-> intel_csr_load_program()
>>
>> During Pc10 entry testing I can see dmc is restoring back the firmware always,
>> but as you mentioned pci-reset can happen unconditionally, but still then
>> also during resume intel_runtime_resume() will be called and based on
>> register read of csr-base-address firmware loading will happen.
> But in your comment you're saying it won't get restored in case of dc9 and
> suspend. So that seems to mismatch what you're saying here (and what the
> commit message says) and what the code does. And this function here is
> called for resume after suspend/hibernate only.

pc10 entry explanation I told is for skylake. dc9 in skylake is not possible.
I think you are confusing between dc6 and dc9. Pc10 can be achieved by
entering into dc6 (not dc9) for skylake. dc9 is the lowest possible state
for broxton which is not present for skylake.

Here intel_csr_load_program() will be used for both skylake and broxton, and instruction
execution flow will be different in case of suspend/resume which I think is confusing
you.

I am ready explain you in detail. It will be good if we discuss specific use-case scenario
and itz software design for specific platform. Another point - as dmc related code for
broxton is not merged better first we close design for skylake. Now, I have added dc9
description in comment thinking of future. If you want I can remove for now and later
can add in bxt patch series for enabling dmc. Will wait for your reply.

-Animesh

>
> So I still see a mismatch between what you're saying here and what the
> code does vs. what the comment above says. It would be clear if there's
> just no comment. And we don't call intel_csr_load_program from random
> places just for luck, if there's unecessary calls of that its kinda a bug
> in the code (and we should just remove it).
> -Daniel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-10 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-25 20:06 [DMC_BUGFIX_SKL_V2 0/5] pc10 entry fixes for skl Animesh Manna
2015-08-25 20:06 ` [DMC_BUGFIX_SKL_V2 1/5] drm/i915/skl: Added a check for the hardware status of csr fw before loading Animesh Manna
2015-08-26 13:10   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-26 14:10     ` Animesh Manna
2015-09-02  8:54       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-09 20:28         ` Animesh Manna
2015-09-10 14:45           ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-10 19:05             ` Animesh Manna
2015-09-10 19:06             ` Animesh Manna [this message]
2015-09-14  7:46               ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-16 19:23                 ` Animesh Manna
2015-09-23  7:57                   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-23 16:27                     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-23 16:28                       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-23 17:17                         ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-23 20:49                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-28  6:52                             ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-28 23:54                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-29  8:51                                 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-30  0:50                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-30 12:14                                     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-30 23:34                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-07 11:04   ` Sunil Kamath
2015-09-07 16:22     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-09 20:33       ` Animesh Manna
2015-09-28  7:03     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-25 20:06 ` [DMC_BUGFIX_SKL_V2 2/5] drm/i915/skl Remove the call for csr uninitialization from suspend path Animesh Manna
2015-09-07 11:05   ` Sunil Kamath
2015-08-25 20:06 ` [DMC_BUGFIX_SKL_V2 3/5] drm/i915/skl: Making DC6 entry is the last call in suspend flow Animesh Manna
2015-09-07 11:06   ` Sunil Kamath
2015-09-28  7:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-28 18:49     ` Hindman, Gavin
2015-09-29  5:31     ` [DMC_BUGFIX_V3] " Animesh Manna
2015-10-16 12:22       ` Imre Deak
2015-10-19  9:26         ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-29  5:38     ` [DMC_BUGFIX_SKL_V2 3/5] " Animesh Manna
2015-09-29  9:01       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-29 12:35         ` Patrik Jakobsson
2015-09-29 13:01           ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-29 13:23             ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-09-29 14:00               ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-25 20:06 ` [DMC_BUGFIX_SKL_V2 4/5] drm/i915/skl: Do not disable cdclk PLL if csr firmware is present Animesh Manna
2015-08-26 13:11   ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-26 14:31     ` Animesh Manna
2015-08-31  1:03     ` Hindman, Gavin
2015-09-02  8:58       ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-07 11:07   ` Sunil Kamath
2015-08-25 20:06 ` [DMC_BUGFIX_SKL_V2 5/5] drm/i915/skl: Block disable call for pw1 if dmc " Animesh Manna
2015-09-07 11:09   ` Sunil Kamath
2015-09-28  7:24     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-09 13:58 ` [DMC_BUGFIX_SKL_V2 0/5] pc10 entry fixes for skl Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55F1D4B0.7050104@intel.com \
    --to=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).