public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sure fb objects with rotated views are also fenceable
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:08:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F68E83.8030405@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442022266-21065-1-git-send-email-vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>


Hi,

On 09/12/2015 02:44 AM, Vivek Kasireddy wrote:
> From: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
>
> Currently, fb objects with rotated views are ignored while pinning. Therefore,
> include the rotated view type and use the view size instead of the object's
> size to determine if it is fenceable. And, look at the view and its offset
> while writing and pinning to the fence registers.

I didn't figure out from the commit message if something is broken or?

AFAIR rotated views deliberately skip on fencing since rotated view has 
shuffled pages in memory so it would be a weird view for userspace to 
handle.

Especially this below:

>   static void i965_write_fence_reg(struct drm_device *dev, int reg,
> -				 struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> +				 struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> +				 const struct i915_ggtt_view *view)
>   {
>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>   	int fence_reg;
>   	int fence_pitch_shift;
> +	const struct i915_ggtt_view *ggtt_view = view;
>
>   	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) {
>   		fence_reg = FENCE_REG_SANDYBRIDGE_0;
> @@ -95,9 +97,13 @@ static void i965_write_fence_reg(struct drm_device *dev, int reg,
>   			size = (size / row_size) * row_size;
>   		}
>
> -		val = (uint64_t)((i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj) + size - 4096) &
> -				 0xfffff000) << 32;
> -		val |= i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj) & 0xfffff000;
> +		if (!ggtt_view)
> +			ggtt_view = &i915_ggtt_view_normal;
> +
> +		val = (uint64_t)((i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset_view((obj), ggtt_view)
> +				  + size - 4096) & 0xfffff000) << 32;
> +		val |= i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset_view((obj), ggtt_view) & 0xfffff000;
> +

Looks like the code can be setting up a fence with a rotated view GGTT 
address which looks wrong? Is this really what is wanted and why?

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-14  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-12  1:44 [PATCH] drm/i915: Make sure fb objects with rotated views are also fenceable Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-12  7:49 ` Chris Wilson
2015-09-15  1:38   ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-14  9:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2015-09-15  2:09   ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-15  9:29     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-09-16  1:38       ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-16  2:05       ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip fence installation for objects with rotated views Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-16  8:03         ` Chris Wilson
2015-09-16 17:36           ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-17 10:25             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-09-19  1:56               ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-19  1:57               ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip fence installation for objects with rotated views (v2) Vivek Kasireddy
2015-09-23  8:46                 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-24  2:19                   ` Vivek
2015-10-26 10:25                 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-27  1:23                   ` Vivek Kasireddy
2015-10-27 10:35                     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-27 12:51                     ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-27 13:34                       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-27 13:48                         ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-27 14:26                           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-27 18:03                             ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-27 18:35                               ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-27 18:47                                 ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-27 18:58                                   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-28 10:17                                     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-29  1:24                                       ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip fence installation for objects with rotated views (v3) Vivek Kasireddy
2015-10-29 10:31                                         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-29 13:20                                         ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-29 13:33                                           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-30  1:54                                             ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip fence installation for objects with rotated views (v4) Vivek Kasireddy
2015-10-30  9:44                                               ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-05 12:01                                                 ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55F68E83.8030405@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox