From: Deepak <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Skip CHV PHY asserts until PHY has been fully reset
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:57:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561250A1.5060709@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441724745-10515-2-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tuesday 08 September 2015 08:35 PM, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> The BIOS can leave the CHV display PHY in some odd state where
> some of the LDOs/lanes won't power down fully when unused. This
> will trigger a host of asserts that were added in:
> 30142273a3e83936fd7b45aa5339311a9295ca51 drm/i915: Add CHV PHY LDO power sanity checks
> 6669e39f95b5530ca8cb9137703ceb5e83e5d648 drm/i915: Add some CHV DPIO lane power state asserts
>
> To avoid that, skip the asserts until the PHY power well has been
> disabled at least once. That will fully reset the PHY, and once
> brought back up, the dynamic power down features will work correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 503dff5..cf1880e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1956,6 +1956,9 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>
> bool edp_low_vswing;
>
> + /* perform PHY state sanity checks? */
> + bool chv_phy_assert[2];
> +
> /*
> * NOTE: This is the dri1/ums dungeon, don't add stuff here. Your patch
> * will be rejected. Instead look for a better place.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 3f682a1..a0a2e6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -987,8 +987,29 @@ static void assert_chv_phy_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> lookup_power_well(dev_priv, PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DPIO_CMN_D);
> u32 phy_control = dev_priv->chv_phy_control;
> u32 phy_status = 0;
> + u32 phy_status_mask = 0xffffffff;
> u32 tmp;
>
> + /*
> + * The BIOS can leave the PHY is some weird state
> + * where it doesn't fully power down some parts.
> + * Disable the asserts until the PHY has been fully
> + * reset (ie. the power well has been disabled at
> + * least once).
> + */
> + if (!dev_priv->chv_phy_assert[DPIO_PHY0])
> + phy_status_mask &= ~(PHY_STATUS_CMN_LDO(DPIO_PHY0, DPIO_CH0) |
> + PHY_STATUS_SPLINE_LDO(DPIO_PHY0, DPIO_CH0, 0) |
> + PHY_STATUS_SPLINE_LDO(DPIO_PHY0, DPIO_CH0, 1) |
> + PHY_STATUS_CMN_LDO(DPIO_PHY0, DPIO_CH1) |
> + PHY_STATUS_SPLINE_LDO(DPIO_PHY0, DPIO_CH1, 0) |
> + PHY_STATUS_SPLINE_LDO(DPIO_PHY0, DPIO_CH1, 1));
> +
> + if (!dev_priv->chv_phy_assert[DPIO_PHY1])
> + phy_status_mask &= ~(PHY_STATUS_CMN_LDO(DPIO_PHY1, DPIO_CH0) |
> + PHY_STATUS_SPLINE_LDO(DPIO_PHY1, DPIO_CH0, 0) |
> + PHY_STATUS_SPLINE_LDO(DPIO_PHY1, DPIO_CH0, 1));
> +
> if (cmn_bc->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv, cmn_bc)) {
> phy_status |= PHY_POWERGOOD(DPIO_PHY0);
>
> @@ -1049,11 +1070,13 @@ static void assert_chv_phy_status(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> phy_status |= PHY_STATUS_SPLINE_LDO(DPIO_PHY1, DPIO_CH0, 1);
> }
>
> + phy_status &= phy_status_mask;
> +
> /*
> * The PHY may be busy with some initial calibration and whatnot,
> * so the power state can take a while to actually change.
> */
> - if (wait_for((tmp = I915_READ(DISPLAY_PHY_STATUS)) == phy_status, 10))
> + if (wait_for((tmp = I915_READ(DISPLAY_PHY_STATUS) & phy_status_mask) == phy_status, 10))
> WARN(phy_status != tmp,
> "Unexpected PHY_STATUS 0x%08x, expected 0x%08x (PHY_CONTROL=0x%08x)\n",
> tmp, phy_status, dev_priv->chv_phy_control);
> @@ -1146,6 +1169,9 @@ static void chv_dpio_cmn_power_well_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabled DPIO PHY%d (PHY_CONTROL=0x%08x)\n",
> phy, dev_priv->chv_phy_control);
>
> + /* PHY is fully reset now, so we can enable the PHY state asserts */
> + dev_priv->chv_phy_assert[phy] = true;
> +
> assert_chv_phy_status(dev_priv);
> }
>
> @@ -1155,6 +1181,16 @@ static void assert_chv_phy_powergate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum dpi
> enum pipe pipe = phy == DPIO_PHY0 ? PIPE_A : PIPE_C;
> u32 reg, val, expected, actual;
>
> + /*
> + * The BIOS can leave the PHY is some weird state
> + * where it doesn't fully power down some parts.
> + * Disable the asserts until the PHY has been fully
> + * reset (ie. the power well has been disabled at
> + * least once).
> + */
> + if (!dev_priv->chv_phy_assert[phy])
> + return;
> +
> if (ch == DPIO_CH0)
> reg = _CHV_CMN_DW0_CH0;
> else
> @@ -1911,6 +1947,10 @@ static void chv_phy_control_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> PHY_CH_POWER_DOWN_OVRD(mask, DPIO_PHY0, DPIO_CH1);
>
> dev_priv->chv_phy_control |= PHY_COM_LANE_RESET_DEASSERT(DPIO_PHY0);
> +
> + dev_priv->chv_phy_assert[DPIO_PHY0] = false;
> + } else {
> + dev_priv->chv_phy_assert[DPIO_PHY0] = true;
> }
>
> if (cmn_d->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv, cmn_d)) {
> @@ -1929,6 +1969,10 @@ static void chv_phy_control_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> PHY_CH_POWER_DOWN_OVRD(mask, DPIO_PHY1, DPIO_CH0);
>
> dev_priv->chv_phy_control |= PHY_COM_LANE_RESET_DEASSERT(DPIO_PHY1);
> +
> + dev_priv->chv_phy_assert[DPIO_PHY1] = false;
> + } else {
> + dev_priv->chv_phy_assert[DPIO_PHY1] = true;
> }
>
> I915_WRITE(DISPLAY_PHY_CONTROL, dev_priv->chv_phy_control);
Change looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Deepak S<deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-05 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-08 15:05 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Don't bypass LRC on CHV ville.syrjala
2015-09-08 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Skip CHV PHY asserts until PHY has been fully reset ville.syrjala
2015-10-05 10:27 ` Deepak [this message]
2015-10-06 8:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-05 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Don't bypass LRC on CHV Deepak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561250A1.5060709@linux.intel.com \
--to=deepak.s@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).