From: "Kumar, Shobhit" <shobhit.kumar@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Shobhit Kumar" <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [v3] drm/i915/skl: If needed sanitize bios programmed cdclk
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:27:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56261004.4010304@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151019134805.GA26517@intel.com>
On 10/19/2015 07:18 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:48:53PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
>> Especially in cases where pre-os does not enable display, cdclk might
>> not be in sane state. During sanitization initialize cdclk with maximum
>> value till we get dynamic cdclk support.
>>
>> v2: Check if BIOS programmed correctly rather than always calling init
>> - Do validation of programmed cdctl and what it is expected
>> - Only do slk_init_cdclk if validation failed else reuse BIOS
>> programmed value
>>
>> v3: Move the validation logic in a separate sanitize function (Ville)
>>
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 12 ++++++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> index b25e99a..86d43e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> @@ -2949,10 +2949,14 @@ void intel_ddi_pll_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>>
>> cdclk_freq = dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev);
>> dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = cdclk_freq;
>> - if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
>> - DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
>> - else
>> - intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
>> + if (skl_sanitize_cdclk(dev_priv))
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Sanitized cdclk programmed by pre-os\n");
>> + else {
>> + if (!(I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL) & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE))
>> + DRM_ERROR("LCPLL1 is disabled\n");
>
> Since skl_sanitize_cdclk() will enable the PLL this shouldn't
> happen anymore, right?
>
Yeah right. Will remove.
>> + else
>> + intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PLLS);
>> + }
>> } else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
>> broxton_init_cdclk(dev);
>> broxton_ddi_phy_init(dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 5f37f84..98333d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -5784,6 +5784,37 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> DRM_ERROR("DBuf power enable timeout\n");
>> }
>>
>> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> + uint32_t lcpll1 = I915_READ(LCPLL1_CTL);
>> + uint32_t cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
>> + int freq = dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk;
>> +
>> + /* Is PLL enabled and locked ? */
>> + if (!((lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_ENABLE) && (lcpll1 & LCPLL_PLL_LOCK)))
>> + goto sanitize;
>> +
>> + /* DPLL okay; verify the cdclock
>> + *
>> + * Noticed in some instances that the freq selection is correct but
>> + * decimal part is programmed wrong from BIOS where pre-os does not
>> + * enable display. Verify the same as well.
>> + */
>> + if (cdctl == ((cdctl & CDCLK_FREQ_SEL_MASK) | skl_cdclk_decimal(freq)))
>> + /* All well; nothing to sanitize */
>> + return false;
>> +sanitize:
>> + /*
>> + * As of now initialize with max cdclk till
>> + * we get dynamic cdclk support
>> + * */
>> + dev_priv->skl_boot_cdclk = 675000;
>
> Should be '= dev_priv->max_cdclk'
>
> I think we end up doing the intel_update_cdclk() before this gets
> called, so max_cdclk should already contain something sensible. The
> whole init sequence is a bit messy currently, but I think we can put
> off cleaning it up after the dc6 stuff gets sorted.
>
Actually at the end of skl_init_cdclock, intel_update_cdclk will be
called and initialize the max_cdclk correctly. In case there was no
sanitization needed, the BIOS programmed cdclk is stored in
skl_boot_cdclk and that is used inside the skl_init_cdclk. Same is
invoked resume time, so we need to update this variable or else change
the logic.
>> + skl_init_cdclk(dev_priv);
>> +
>> + /* we did have to sanitize */
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Adjust CDclk dividers to allow high res or save power if possible */
>> static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
>> {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> index 0598932..ec10e6a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ void broxton_ddi_phy_uninit(struct drm_device *dev);
>> void bxt_enable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void bxt_disable_dc9(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +int skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
>> --
>> 2.4.3
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-05 15:22 [PATCH] drm/i915/skl: Init cdclk in the driver rather than relying on pre-os Shobhit Kumar
2015-10-05 15:35 ` Imre Deak
2015-10-06 6:35 ` Jani Nikula
2015-10-06 9:57 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2015-10-06 9:56 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2015-10-06 10:41 ` Imre Deak
2015-10-06 11:03 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2015-10-06 11:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-06 11:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-06 12:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-06 12:43 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2015-10-06 13:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-06 13:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-06 13:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-07 6:31 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2015-10-08 4:28 ` [v2] " Shobhit Kumar
2015-10-08 11:29 ` Imre Deak
2015-10-08 12:13 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2015-10-08 12:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-09 10:53 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2015-10-16 13:08 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2015-10-16 13:18 ` [v3] drm/i915/skl: If needed sanitize bios programmed cdclk Shobhit Kumar
2015-10-19 7:43 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2015-10-19 13:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-20 9:57 ` Kumar, Shobhit [this message]
2015-10-20 11:19 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-20 12:27 ` Kumar, Shobhit
2015-10-20 12:43 ` [v4] " Shobhit Kumar
2015-10-20 12:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-21 6:25 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56261004.4010304@linux.intel.com \
--to=shobhit.kumar@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=shobhit.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).