From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/skl: Consider plane rotation when calculating stride in skl_do_mmio_flip
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:11:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562659A6.3070105@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151020150804.GM26517@intel.com>
On 20/10/15 16:08, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 03:54:11PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> Previously rotation was ignored and wrong stride programmed
>> into the plane registers resulting in a corrupt image on screen.
>>
>> v2: Do not access potentialy old plane state at flip time,
>> but store the rotation value at the time of queing the flip.
>> (Ville)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> Testcase: igt/kms_rotation_crc/primary-rotation-90-flip-stress (SKL)
>> Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 1fc1d240d3c1..9cb29086971a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -11091,13 +11091,14 @@ static bool use_mmio_flip(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>> }
>>
>> static void skl_do_mmio_flip(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>> + unsigned int rotation,
>> struct intel_unpin_work *work)
>> {
>> struct drm_device *dev = intel_crtc->base.dev;
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> struct drm_framebuffer *fb = intel_crtc->base.primary->fb;
>> const enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
>> - u32 ctl, stride;
>> + u32 ctl, stride, tile_height;
>>
>> ctl = I915_READ(PLANE_CTL(pipe, 0));
>> ctl &= ~PLANE_CTL_TILED_MASK;
>> @@ -11121,9 +11122,16 @@ static void skl_do_mmio_flip(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
>> * The stride is either expressed as a multiple of 64 bytes chunks for
>> * linear buffers or in number of tiles for tiled buffers.
>> */
>> - stride = fb->pitches[0] /
>> - intel_fb_stride_alignment(dev, fb->modifier[0],
>> - fb->pixel_format);
>> + if (intel_rotation_90_or_270(rotation)) {
>> + /* stride = Surface height in tiles */
>> + tile_height = intel_tile_height(dev, fb->pixel_format,
>> + fb->modifier[0], 0);
>> + stride = DIV_ROUND_UP(fb->height, tile_height);
>> + } else {
>> + stride = fb->pitches[0] /
>> + intel_fb_stride_alignment(dev, fb->modifier[0],
>> + fb->pixel_format);
>> + }
>>
>> /*
>> * Both PLANE_CTL and PLANE_STRIDE are not updated on vblank but on
>> @@ -11181,7 +11189,7 @@ static void intel_do_mmio_flip(struct intel_mmio_flip *mmio_flip)
>> intel_pipe_update_start(crtc);
>>
>> if (INTEL_INFO(mmio_flip->i915)->gen >= 9)
>> - skl_do_mmio_flip(crtc, work);
>> + skl_do_mmio_flip(crtc, mmio_flip->rotation, work);
>> else
>> /* use_mmio_flip() retricts MMIO flips to ilk+ */
>> ilk_do_mmio_flip(crtc, work);
>> @@ -11208,10 +11216,8 @@ static void intel_mmio_flip_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
>>
>> static int intel_queue_mmio_flip(struct drm_device *dev,
>> struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> - struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>> - struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>> - struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
>> - uint32_t flags)
>> + unsigned int rotation,
>> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>> {
>> struct intel_mmio_flip *mmio_flip;
>>
>> @@ -11222,6 +11228,7 @@ static int intel_queue_mmio_flip(struct drm_device *dev,
>> mmio_flip->i915 = to_i915(dev);
>> mmio_flip->req = i915_gem_request_reference(obj->last_write_req);
>> mmio_flip->crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
>> + mmio_flip->rotation = rotation;
>
> Could just do the crtc->primary->state->rotation thing here and avoid
> having to pass the rotation from the caller.
Oh that would indeed be nicer. I'll do a v3.
> But the patch looks OK anyway:
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Can I carry over the r-b to v3?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-20 14:54 [PATCH v2] drm/i915/skl: Consider plane rotation when calculating stride in skl_do_mmio_flip Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-20 15:08 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-20 15:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2015-10-20 15:17 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-20 15:20 ` [PATCH v3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-10-21 6:51 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=562659A6.3070105@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox