From: "Thulasimani, Sivakumar" <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
To: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
<ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jim.bride@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] drm/i915: Introduce struct intel_dp_signal_levels
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:54:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562C6782.1060904@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445594525-7174-17-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
This is a good simplification but for a wrong implementation :). we know
that our current
implementation is wrong and needs to be done the opposite way to make
our code compliant with spec. i assume that it will then be a question
of when
this will be removed rather than if. In such a scenario is this and
following
patches/optimizations needed "at present" ?
regards,
Sivakumar
On 10/23/2015 3:31 PM, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
> In order to clarify which platforms support which combination of voltage
> swing and pre emphasis level, introduce struct intel_dp_signal_levels.
> With the new struct, the if ladder to determine the values used is put
> in one place, intel_dp_init_signal_levels().
>
> This also wires gens 4, 5 and non-eDP ports on gen 6 and 7 to use the
> new struct.
>
> v2: Rebase
> Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_signal_levels.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 11 +++
> 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 1236791..e640b59 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -5220,6 +5220,8 @@ intel_dp_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> if (HAS_DDI(dev))
> intel_dp->prepare_link_retrain = intel_ddi_prepare_link_retrain;
>
> + intel_dp_init_signal_levels(intel_dp);
> +
> /* Preserve the current hw state. */
> intel_dp->DP = I915_READ(intel_dp->output_reg);
> intel_dp->attached_connector = intel_connector;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_signal_levels.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_signal_levels.c
> index e516dd2..365bdc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_signal_levels.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_signal_levels.c
> @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
> #include "intel_drv.h"
>
> /* These are source-specific values. */
> -uint8_t
> -intel_dp_voltage_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +static uint8_t
> +_dp_voltage_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> @@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ intel_dp_voltage_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_2;
> }
>
> -uint8_t
> -intel_dp_pre_emphasis_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint8_t voltage_swing)
> +static uint8_t
> +_dp_pre_emphasis_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint8_t voltage_swing)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
> enum port port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->port;
> @@ -389,10 +389,10 @@ static uint32_t chv_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static uint32_t
> -gen4_signal_levels(uint8_t train_set)
> +static void
> +gen4_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint8_t train_set)
> {
> - uint32_t signal_levels = 0;
> + uint32_t signal_levels = 0;
>
> switch (train_set & DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK) {
> case DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0:
> @@ -424,9 +424,38 @@ gen4_signal_levels(uint8_t train_set)
> signal_levels |= DP_PRE_EMPHASIS_9_5;
> break;
> }
> - return signal_levels;
> +
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Using signal levels %08x\n", signal_levels);
> +
> + intel_dp->DP &= ~(DP_VOLTAGE_MASK | DP_PRE_EMPHASIS_MASK);
> + intel_dp->DP |= signal_levels;
> }
>
> +static const struct signal_levels gen4_signal_levels = {
> + .max_voltage = DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_2,
> + .max_pre_emph = {
> + DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_2,
> + DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_2,
> + DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_1,
> + DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0,
> + },
> +
> + .set = gen4_set_signal_levels,
> +};
> +
> +/* Not for eDP */
> +static const struct signal_levels snb_signal_levels = {
> + .max_voltage = DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_3,
> + .max_pre_emph = {
> + DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_2,
> + DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_2,
> + DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_1,
> + DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPH_LEVEL_0,
> + },
> +
> + .set = gen4_set_signal_levels,
> +};
> +
> /* Gen6's DP voltage swing and pre-emphasis control */
> static uint32_t
> gen6_edp_signal_levels(uint8_t train_set)
> @@ -486,13 +515,12 @@ gen7_edp_signal_levels(uint8_t train_set)
> }
> }
>
> -void
> -intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +static void
> +_update_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> enum port port = intel_dig_port->port;
> struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> uint32_t signal_levels, mask = 0;
> uint8_t train_set = intel_dp->train_set[0];
>
> @@ -514,21 +542,66 @@ intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> signal_levels = gen6_edp_signal_levels(train_set);
> mask = EDP_LINK_TRAIN_VOL_EMP_MASK_SNB;
> } else {
> - signal_levels = gen4_signal_levels(train_set);
> - mask = DP_VOLTAGE_MASK | DP_PRE_EMPHASIS_MASK;
> + WARN(1, "Should be calling intel_dp->signal_levels->set instead.");
> + return;
> }
>
> if (mask)
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Using signal levels %08x\n", signal_levels);
>
> + intel_dp->DP = (intel_dp->DP & ~mask) | signal_levels;
> +}
> +
> +uint8_t
> +intel_dp_voltage_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + if (intel_dp->signal_levels)
> + return intel_dp->signal_levels->max_voltage;
> + else
> + return _dp_voltage_max(intel_dp);
> +}
> +
> +uint8_t
> +intel_dp_pre_emphasis_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint8_t voltage_swing)
> +{
> + if (intel_dp->signal_levels)
> + return intel_dp->signal_levels->max_pre_emph[voltage_swing];
> + else
> + return _dp_pre_emphasis_max(intel_dp, voltage_swing);
> +}
> +
> +void
> +intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> + uint8_t train_set = intel_dp->train_set[0];
> +
> + if (intel_dp->signal_levels)
> + intel_dp->signal_levels->set(intel_dp, train_set);
> + else
> + _update_signal_levels(intel_dp);
> +
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Using vswing level %d\n",
> train_set & DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK);
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Using pre-emphasis level %d\n",
> (train_set & DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_MASK) >>
> DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_SHIFT);
>
> - intel_dp->DP = (intel_dp->DP & ~mask) | signal_levels;
> -
> I915_WRITE(intel_dp->output_reg, intel_dp->DP);
> POSTING_READ(intel_dp->output_reg);
> }
> +
> +void
> +intel_dp_init_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> + enum port port = intel_dig_port->port;
> +
> + if (port != PORT_A && (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev) || IS_GEN6(dev)))
> + intel_dp->signal_levels = &snb_signal_levels;
> +
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen <= 5)
> + intel_dp->signal_levels = &gen4_signal_levels;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index d758e94..e00ce6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -726,6 +726,14 @@ struct sink_crc {
> int last_count;
> };
>
> +struct intel_dp;
> +struct signal_levels {
> + uint8_t max_voltage;
> + uint8_t max_pre_emph[4];
> +
> + void (*set)(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint8_t train_set);
> +};
> +
> struct intel_dp {
> uint32_t output_reg;
> uint32_t aux_ch_ctl_reg;
> @@ -744,6 +752,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
> int sink_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES];
> struct sink_crc sink_crc;
> struct drm_dp_aux aux;
> + const struct signal_levels *signal_levels;
> uint8_t train_set[4];
> int panel_power_up_delay;
> int panel_power_down_delay;
> @@ -1263,6 +1272,8 @@ bool intel_dp_source_supports_hbr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> bool
> intel_dp_get_link_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, uint8_t link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE]);
>
> +void intel_dp_init_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +
> /* intel_dp_mst.c */
> int intel_dp_mst_encoder_init(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, int conn_id);
> void intel_dp_mst_encoder_cleanup(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port);
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-25 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-23 10:01 [PATCH 00/22] DP refactoring v2 Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 01/22] drm/i915: Don't pass *DP around to link training functions Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-25 2:01 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 02/22] drm/i915: Split write of pattern to DP reg from intel_dp_set_link_train Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-25 2:06 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 03/22] drm/i915 Call get_adjust_train() from clock recovery and channel eq Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-25 2:11 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 04/22] drm/i915: Move register write into intel_dp_set_signal_levels() Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-25 2:28 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 05/22] drm/i915: Move generic link training code to a separate file Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-25 2:37 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 06/22] drm/i915: Create intel_dp->prepare_link_retrain() hook Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-25 2:40 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 07/22] drm/i915: Make intel_dp_source_supports_hbr2() take an intel_dp pointer Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-25 2:48 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2015-11-05 13:22 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 08/22] drm/i915: Move link training setup code to separate functions (v2) Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 09/22] drm/i915: Move test for max voltage on all lanes to separate function Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 10/22] drm/i915: Add function for getting the current link training voltage Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-25 3:56 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 11/22] drm/i915: Split full retries loop out of clock recovery code (v2) Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 12/22] drm/i915: Make the link training test for same voltage smaller Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 13/22] drm/i915: Move the voltage changed check into intel_get_adjust_train() Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 14/22] drm/i915: Add missing newline to link training debug message Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 15/22] drm/i915: Split setting of vswing and pre_emph levels to separate file Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:01 ` [PATCH 16/22] drm/i915: Introduce struct intel_dp_signal_levels Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-25 5:24 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar [this message]
2015-10-26 7:22 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:02 ` [PATCH 17/22] drm/i915: Use struct intel_dp_signal_levels for eDP on SNB and IVB Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:02 ` [PATCH 18/22] drm/i915: Use struct intel_dp_signal_levels for VLV Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:02 ` [PATCH 19/22] drm/i915: Use struct intel_dp_signal_levels for CHV Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:02 ` [PATCH 20/22] drm/i915: Use struct intel_dp_signal_levels for DDI platforms Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:02 ` [PATCH 21/22] drm/i915: Remove old functions for maximum DP vswing and pre-emph levels Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
2015-10-23 10:02 ` [PATCH 22/22] drm/i915: Move ddi_signal_levels() to intel_dp_signal_levels.c Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=562C6782.1060904@intel.com \
--to=sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com \
--cc=ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jim.bride@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox