public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: fix the CFB size check
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:04:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5641EB70.3090502@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447158056.2734.28.camel@intel.com>

Op 10-11-15 om 13:20 schreef Zanoni, Paulo R:
> Em Ter, 2015-11-10 às 11:22 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst escreveu:
>> Op 04-11-15 om 20:10 schreef Paulo Zanoni:
>>> In function find_compression_threshold() we try to over-allocate
>>> CFB
>>> space in order to reudce reallocations and fragmentation, and we're
>>> not considering that at the CFB size check. Consider it.
>>>
>>> There is also a longer-term plan to kill
>>> dev_priv->fbc.uncompressed_size, but this will come later.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 3 ++-
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
>>> index dee99c9..e99aacc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
>>> @@ -719,7 +719,8 @@ static int intel_fbc_setup_cfb(struct
>>> intel_crtc *crtc)
>>>  	size = intel_fbc_calculate_cfb_size(crtc);
>>>  	cpp = drm_format_plane_cpp(fb->pixel_format, 0);
>>>  
>>> -	if (size <= dev_priv->fbc.uncompressed_size)
>>> +	if (dev_priv->fbc.compressed_fb.allocated &&
>>> +	    size <= dev_priv->fbc.compressed_fb.size * dev_priv-
>>>> fbc.threshold)
>>>  		return 0;
>>>  
>>>  	/* Release any current block */
>> Should i8xx_fbc_enable be changed too then?
> As far as I understand, no. We're just reserving a bigger buffer in
> case we need it later, but the size used by the hardware is still the
> same. But I'm not 100% sure the i8xx code is actually correct since I
> didn't dig deep into the ancient scrolls. By not touching i8xx we're
> also avoiding a possible new regression.
>
The original check was for size <= uncompressed_size,
new is threshold * compressed.

I think i8xx_fbc_enable might have to do the same when calculating cfb_pitch
for this patch to work as intended.

~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-10 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-04 19:10 [PATCH 00/13] Yet another FBC series, v3 part 1 Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: rename intel_fbc_nuke to intel_fbc_recompress Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: extract fbc_on_pipe_a_only() Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: remove unnecessary check for crtc->primary->fb Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: extract crtc_is_valid() on the FBC code Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: use struct intel_crtc *crtc at __intel_fbc_update() Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: fix the __intel_fbc_update() comments Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: don't disable_fbc() if FBC is already disabled Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-05 11:29   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-05 14:52     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-05 15:52       ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: refactor FBC deactivation at init Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915: remove too-frequent FBC debug message Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: fix the CFB size check Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-10 10:22   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-10 12:20     ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-11-10 13:04       ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2015-11-11 13:39         ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-11-11 14:25           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-11 14:27         ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-11 15:36           ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: clarify that checking the FB stride for CFB is intentional Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: remove in_dbg_master check from intel_fbc.c Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-04 20:13   ` Jesse Barnes
2015-11-04 20:19     ` Jason Wessel
2015-11-04 20:26       ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-11-04 20:32         ` Jesse Barnes
2015-11-04 19:10 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: remove newline from a no_fbc_reason message Paulo Zanoni
2015-11-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 00/13] Yet another FBC series, v3 part 1 Daniel Stone
2015-11-13 16:36   ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2015-11-13 16:58     ` Daniel Stone

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5641EB70.3090502@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox