From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Release vma when the handle is closed
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:46:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5672BCD2.9000209@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450093012-14955-9-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Hi,
On 14/12/15 11:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
> In order to prevent a leak of the vma on shared objects, we need to
> hook into the object_close callback to destroy the vma on the object for
> this file. However, if we destroyed that vma immediately we may cause
> unexpected application stalls as we try to unbind a busy vma - hence we
> defer the unbind to when we retire the vma.
>
> Testcase: igt/gem_ppggtt/flink-and-close-vma-leak
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index e7eef5fd6918..70979339d58a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1656,6 +1656,7 @@ static struct drm_driver driver = {
> .debugfs_init = i915_debugfs_init,
> .debugfs_cleanup = i915_debugfs_cleanup,
> #endif
> + .gem_close_object = i915_gem_close_object,
> .gem_free_object = i915_gem_free_object,
> .gem_vm_ops = &i915_gem_vm_ops,
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index eb775eb1c693..696469a06715 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2686,6 +2686,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object *i915_gem_alloc_object(struct drm_device *dev,
> size_t size);
> struct drm_i915_gem_object *i915_gem_object_create_from_data(
> struct drm_device *dev, const void *data, size_t size);
> +void i915_gem_close_object(struct drm_gem_object *gem, struct drm_file *file);
> void i915_gem_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
> void i915_gem_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 1d21c5b79215..7c13c27a6470 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2367,6 +2367,30 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void i915_vma_close(struct i915_vma *vma)
> +{
> + RQ_BUG_ON(vma->closed);
Same complaint as in the previous patch, cannot use RQ_BUG_ON. Maybe
need GEM_BUG_ON then, don't know.
> + vma->closed = true;
Hmmm, vma->detached? Because VMA is not really closed. And
i915_vma_detach - it would symbolise then that VMA has been detached
from the object and is lingering only on the VM lists.
> +
> + list_del_init(&vma->obj_link);
> + if (!vma->active)
> + WARN_ON(i915_vma_unbind(vma));
> +}
> +
> +void i915_gem_close_object(struct drm_gem_object *gem,
> + struct drm_file *file)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = to_intel_bo(gem);
> + struct drm_i915_file_private *fpriv = file->driver_priv;
> + struct i915_vma *vma, *vn;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&obj->base.dev->struct_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, vn, &obj->vma_list, obj_link)
> + if (vma->vm->file == fpriv)
> + i915_vma_close(vma);
> + mutex_unlock(&obj->base.dev->struct_mutex);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * i915_gem_wait_ioctl - implements DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_WAIT
> * @DRM_IOCTL_ARGS: standard ioctl arguments
> @@ -2577,9 +2601,6 @@ static int __i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma, bool wait)
> RQ_BUG_ON(vma->active);
> }
>
> - if (list_empty(&vma->obj_link))
> - return 0;
> -
> if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node)) {
> i915_gem_vma_destroy(vma);
> return 0;
> @@ -3792,20 +3813,8 @@ void i915_gem_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj)
> trace_i915_gem_object_destroy(obj);
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next, &obj->vma_list, obj_link) {
> - int ret;
> -
> vma->pin_count = 0;
> - ret = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
> - if (WARN_ON(ret == -ERESTARTSYS)) {
> - bool was_interruptible;
> -
> - was_interruptible = dev_priv->mm.interruptible;
> - dev_priv->mm.interruptible = false;
> -
> - WARN_ON(i915_vma_unbind(vma));
> -
> - dev_priv->mm.interruptible = was_interruptible;
> - }
> + i915_vma_close(vma);
In what circumstances can there be any VMAs still left unclosed at this
point? I thought i915_gem_close_object would had closed them all.
> }
>
> /* Stolen objects don't hold a ref, but do hold pin count. Fix that up
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 5505603f52af..9f594c33bd0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -3240,6 +3240,8 @@ i915_vma_retire(struct drm_i915_gem_request_active *active,
> return;
>
> list_move_tail(&vma->vm_link, &vma->vm->inactive_list);
> + if (unlikely(vma->closed))
> + WARN_ON(i915_vma_unbind(vma));
> }
>
> static struct i915_vma *
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h
> index c2f2c62ac88d..be7e8526b219 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h
> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ struct i915_vma {
> unsigned int bound : 4;
> unsigned int active : I915_NUM_RINGS;
> bool is_ggtt : 1;
> + bool closed : 1;
>
> /**
> * Support different GGTT views into the same object.
>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-17 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-14 11:36 [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Introduce drm_i915_gem_request_node for request tracking Chris Wilson
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Refactor activity tracking for requests Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 17:16 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-16 17:31 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Rename vma->*_list to *_link for consistency Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 11:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 11:24 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 11:45 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Amalgamate GGTT/ppGTT vma debug list walkers Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 11:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Reduce the pointer dance of i915_is_ggtt() Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 11:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Store owning file on the i915_address_space Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 11:52 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 13:25 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: i915_vma_move_to_active prep patch Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 12:04 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Track active vma requests Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 12:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Release vma when the handle is closed Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 13:46 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2015-12-17 14:11 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 14:21 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 14:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Mark the context and address space as closed Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 12:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 12:39 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 12:48 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 13:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 14:15 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 14:26 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 14:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 11/11] Revert "drm/i915: Clean up associated VMAs on context destruction" Chris Wilson
2015-12-14 15:58 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Introduce drm_i915_gem_request_node for request tracking Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 16:11 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-15 10:51 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Introduce drm_i915_gem_request_active " Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 14:48 ` ✗ failure: UK.CI.checkpatch.pl Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5672BCD2.9000209@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox