public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Release vma when the handle is closed
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:46:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5672BCD2.9000209@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450093012-14955-9-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


Hi,

On 14/12/15 11:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
> In order to prevent a leak of the vma on shared objects, we need to
> hook into the object_close callback to destroy the vma on the object for
> this file. However, if we destroyed that vma immediately we may cause
> unexpected application stalls as we try to unbind a busy vma - hence we
> defer the unbind to when we retire the vma.
>
> Testcase: igt/gem_ppggtt/flink-and-close-vma-leak
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c     |  1 +
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h     |  1 +
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c     | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c |  2 ++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h |  1 +
>   5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index e7eef5fd6918..70979339d58a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1656,6 +1656,7 @@ static struct drm_driver driver = {
>   	.debugfs_init = i915_debugfs_init,
>   	.debugfs_cleanup = i915_debugfs_cleanup,
>   #endif
> +	.gem_close_object = i915_gem_close_object,
>   	.gem_free_object = i915_gem_free_object,
>   	.gem_vm_ops = &i915_gem_vm_ops,
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index eb775eb1c693..696469a06715 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2686,6 +2686,7 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object *i915_gem_alloc_object(struct drm_device *dev,
>   						  size_t size);
>   struct drm_i915_gem_object *i915_gem_object_create_from_data(
>   		struct drm_device *dev, const void *data, size_t size);
> +void i915_gem_close_object(struct drm_gem_object *gem, struct drm_file *file);
>   void i915_gem_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
>   void i915_gem_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 1d21c5b79215..7c13c27a6470 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -2367,6 +2367,30 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> +static void i915_vma_close(struct i915_vma *vma)
> +{
> +	RQ_BUG_ON(vma->closed);

Same complaint as in the previous patch, cannot use RQ_BUG_ON. Maybe 
need GEM_BUG_ON then, don't know.

> +	vma->closed = true;

Hmmm, vma->detached? Because VMA is not really closed. And 
i915_vma_detach - it would symbolise then that VMA has been detached 
from the object and is lingering only on the VM lists.

> +
> +	list_del_init(&vma->obj_link);
> +	if (!vma->active)
> +		WARN_ON(i915_vma_unbind(vma));
> +}
> +
> +void i915_gem_close_object(struct drm_gem_object *gem,
> +			   struct drm_file *file)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = to_intel_bo(gem);
> +	struct drm_i915_file_private *fpriv = file->driver_priv;
> +	struct i915_vma *vma, *vn;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&obj->base.dev->struct_mutex);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, vn, &obj->vma_list, obj_link)
> +		if (vma->vm->file == fpriv)
> +			i915_vma_close(vma);
> +	mutex_unlock(&obj->base.dev->struct_mutex);
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * i915_gem_wait_ioctl - implements DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_WAIT
>    * @DRM_IOCTL_ARGS: standard ioctl arguments
> @@ -2577,9 +2601,6 @@ static int __i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma, bool wait)
>   		RQ_BUG_ON(vma->active);
>   	}
>
> -	if (list_empty(&vma->obj_link))
> -		return 0;
> -
>   	if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node)) {
>   		i915_gem_vma_destroy(vma);
>   		return 0;
> @@ -3792,20 +3813,8 @@ void i915_gem_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj)
>   	trace_i915_gem_object_destroy(obj);
>
>   	list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next, &obj->vma_list, obj_link) {
> -		int ret;
> -
>   		vma->pin_count = 0;
> -		ret = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
> -		if (WARN_ON(ret == -ERESTARTSYS)) {
> -			bool was_interruptible;
> -
> -			was_interruptible = dev_priv->mm.interruptible;
> -			dev_priv->mm.interruptible = false;
> -
> -			WARN_ON(i915_vma_unbind(vma));
> -
> -			dev_priv->mm.interruptible = was_interruptible;
> -		}
> +		i915_vma_close(vma);

In what circumstances can there be any VMAs still left unclosed at this 
point? I thought i915_gem_close_object would had closed them all.

>   	}
>
>   	/* Stolen objects don't hold a ref, but do hold pin count. Fix that up
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 5505603f52af..9f594c33bd0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -3240,6 +3240,8 @@ i915_vma_retire(struct drm_i915_gem_request_active *active,
>   		return;
>
>   	list_move_tail(&vma->vm_link, &vma->vm->inactive_list);
> +	if (unlikely(vma->closed))
> +		WARN_ON(i915_vma_unbind(vma));
>   }
>
>   static struct i915_vma *
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h
> index c2f2c62ac88d..be7e8526b219 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h
> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ struct i915_vma {
>   	unsigned int bound : 4;
>   	unsigned int active : I915_NUM_RINGS;
>   	bool is_ggtt : 1;
> +	bool closed : 1;
>
>   	/**
>   	 * Support different GGTT views into the same object.
>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-17 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-14 11:36 [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Introduce drm_i915_gem_request_node for request tracking Chris Wilson
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Refactor activity tracking for requests Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 17:16   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-16 17:31     ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Rename vma->*_list to *_link for consistency Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 11:14   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 11:24     ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 11:45       ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Amalgamate GGTT/ppGTT vma debug list walkers Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 11:21   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Reduce the pointer dance of i915_is_ggtt() Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 11:31   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Store owning file on the i915_address_space Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 11:52   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 13:25     ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: i915_vma_move_to_active prep patch Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 12:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Track active vma requests Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 12:26   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Release vma when the handle is closed Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 13:46   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2015-12-17 14:11     ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 14:21     ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 14:32       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Mark the context and address space as closed Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 12:37   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 12:39     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 12:48     ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 13:26       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 14:15   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-17 14:26     ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 14:35       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 11/11] Revert "drm/i915: Clean up associated VMAs on context destruction" Chris Wilson
2015-12-14 15:58 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Introduce drm_i915_gem_request_node for request tracking Tvrtko Ursulin
2015-12-14 16:11   ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-15 10:51 ` [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Introduce drm_i915_gem_request_active " Chris Wilson
2015-12-17 14:48 ` ✗ failure: UK.CI.checkpatch.pl Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5672BCD2.9000209@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox