intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
To: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:21:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <569DF904.20404@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452852468.3964.4.camel@gmail.com>



On Friday 15 January 2016 03:37 PM, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 19:20 +0530, Shubhangi Shrivastava wrote:
>> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 07:03 PM, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 13:20 +0200, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 18:20 +0530, Shubhangi Shrivastava wrote:
>>>>> intel_dp_detect() is called for not just detection but
>>>>> during modes enumeration as well. Repeating the whole
>>>>> sequence during each of these calls is wasteful and
>>>>> time consuming.
>>>>> This patch moves probing for panel, DPCD read etc done in
>>>>> intel_dp_detect() to a new function intel_dp_long_pulse().
>>>>> Note that the behavior of intel_dp_detect() is changed to
>>>>> report connected or disconnected depending on whether the
>>>>> EDID is available or not.
>>>>> This change will be required by further patches in the series
>>>>> to avoid performing duplicated DPCD operations on hotplug.
>>>>>
>>>>> v2: Moved a hunk to next patch of the series.
>>>>>       Moved intel_dp_unset_edid to out. (Ander)
>>>>> v3: Rephrased commit message and intel_dp_unset_dp() is called
>>>>>       within intel_dp_set_dp() to free the previous EDID. (Ander)
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested-by: Nathan D Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>> -----
>>>>> --
>>>>> -
>>>>>    1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>>>> index 796e3d3..e3b4208 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>>>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static void edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp
>>>>> *intel_dp,
>>>>> bool sync);
>>>>>    static void vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>>>>>    static void vlv_steal_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>>>    				      enum pipe pipe);
>>>>> +static void intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>>>>>    
>>>>>    static unsigned int intel_dp_unused_lane_mask(int lane_count)
>>>>>    {
>>>>> @@ -4587,6 +4588,7 @@ intel_dp_set_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>>>    	struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp
>>>>> ->attached_connector;
>>>>>    	struct edid *edid;
>>>>>    
>>>>> +	intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
>>>>>    	edid = intel_dp_get_edid(intel_dp);
>>>>>    	intel_connector->detect_edid = edid;
>>>>>    
>>>>> @@ -4607,9 +4609,10 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>>>    	intel_dp->has_audio = false;
>>>>>    }
>>>>>    
>>>>> -static enum drm_connector_status
>>>>> -intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
>>>>> +static void
>>>>> +intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
>>>>>    {
>>>>> +	struct drm_connector *connector = &intel_connector->base;
>>>>>    	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>>>>>    	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port =
>>>>> dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>>>>>    	struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
>>>>> @@ -4619,17 +4622,6 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>>> bool
>>>>> force)
>>>>>    	bool ret;
>>>>>    	u8 sink_irq_vector;
>>>>>    
>>>>> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
>>>>> -		      connector->base.id, connector->name);
>>>>> -	intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
>>>>> -
>>>>> -	if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
>>>>> -		/* MST devices are disconnected from a monitor POV */
>>>>> -		if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
>>>>> -			intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
>>>>> -		return connector_status_disconnected;
>>>>> -	}
>>>>> -
>>>>>    	power_domain =
>>>>> intel_display_port_aux_power_domain(intel_encoder);
>>>>>    	intel_display_power_get(to_i915(dev), power_domain);
>>>>>    
>>>>> @@ -4653,14 +4645,8 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>>> bool
>>>>> force)
>>>>>    	intel_dp_probe_oui(intel_dp);
>>>>>    
>>>>>    	ret = intel_dp_probe_mst(intel_dp);
>>>>> -	if (ret) {
>>>>> -		/* if we are in MST mode then this connector
>>>>> -		   won't appear connected or have anything with EDID on
>>>>> it
>>>>> */
>>>>> -		if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
>>>>> -			intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
>>>> This deletion is new in this version of the patch. I think we still need
>>>> the
>>>> hunk above, otherwise we might not properly update the encoder type when
>>>> we
>>>> switch from an HDMI sink connected through a level shifter to an MST sink.
>>>>
>>>> Ander
>>>>
>> Encoder type setting for MST is being done in intel_dp_detect(). So,
>> don't find a need to add it here.
> Yes, but that one only covers the case where the device was already previously
> identified as MST. For a device identified as MST by the call to
> intel_dp_probe_mst() in intel_dp_long_pulse(), the encoder type override will
> not be done. Hopefully, Ville's patch that splits the encoder types and makes
> this unnecessary will land soon, but for now just leave the override there.
>
> Ander

Alright.. Moved the overriding of encoder type to be done before probing..

>>>>> -		status = connector_status_disconnected;
>>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>>>    		goto out;
>>> Also, there is no call to intel_dp_unset_edid() for this case, since the
>>> code
>>> will reach the label 'out' with status being connected. So in this case the
>>> return value of intel_dp_detect() will depend on the stale value of
>>> intel_dp->detect_edid.
>>>
>>> Ander
>> Yes.. Thats right.. Will add a call to intel_dp_unset_edid() in is_mst()
>> check of intel_dp_detect().

Added call to intel_dp_unset_edid() in is_mst() check of intel_dp_detect().

>>>>> -	}
>>>>>    
>>>>>    	/*
>>>>>    	 * Clearing NACK and defer counts to get their exact values
>>>>> @@ -4691,8 +4677,36 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>>> bool
>>>>> force)
>>>>>    	}
>>>>>    
>>>>>    out:
>>>>> +	if (status != connector_status_connected)
>>>>> +		intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
>>>>>    	intel_display_power_put(to_i915(dev), power_domain);
>>>>> -	return status;
>>>>> +	return;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static enum drm_connector_status
>>>>> +intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>>>>> +	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port =
>>>>> dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>>>>> +	struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
>>>>> +	struct intel_connector *intel_connector =
>>>>> to_intel_connector(connector);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
>>>>> +		     connector->base.id, connector->name);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
>>>>> +		/* MST devices are disconnected from a monitor POV */
>>>>> +		if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
>>>>> +			intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
>>>>> +		return connector_status_disconnected;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	if (intel_connector->detect_edid)
>>>>> +		return connector_status_connected;
>>>>> +	else
>>>>> +		return connector_status_disconnected;
>>>>>    }
>>>>>    
>>>>>    static void

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-19  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-05 12:50 [PATCH 0/6] Fixing sink count related detection over Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 11:20   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-13 13:33     ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-14 13:50       ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-15 10:07         ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 10:24           ` [PATCH] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-19  8:51           ` Shubhangi Shrivastava [this message]
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Cleaning up intel_dp_hpd_pulse Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 14:05   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 15:04   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 10:52     ` [PATCH] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 21:05       ` Lukas Wunner
2016-01-19  4:44         ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19  8:44           ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-19  8:59             ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19  9:05               ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-19  9:11                 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19  9:55                   ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Reorganizing intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-19  8:53     ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:00   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19  8:56     ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: read sink_count dpcd always Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:04   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 12:44     ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 12:46       ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 12:49         ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it and " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 13:00       ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19  8:36         ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: force full detect on sink count change Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:50   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19  8:40     ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 13:49 ` ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT Patchwork
2016-01-18 10:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev6) Patchwork
2016-01-18 11:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev7) Patchwork
2016-01-18 13:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev8) Patchwork
2016-01-19  9:38   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 10:22     ` Shrivastava, Shubhangi
2016-01-19 10:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev9) Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-06 12:28 [PATCH 0/6] Fixing sink count related detection over Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-06 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-16 13:40   ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-17  6:17     ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-17  9:22       ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-17 11:50         ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-02 12:55 [PATCH 0/6] Fixing sink count related detection over Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-02 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-02 13:05   ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=569DF904.20404@intel.com \
    --to=shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com \
    --cc=conselvan2@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).