From: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
To: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:21:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569DF904.20404@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452852468.3964.4.camel@gmail.com>
On Friday 15 January 2016 03:37 PM, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 19:20 +0530, Shubhangi Shrivastava wrote:
>> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 07:03 PM, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2016-01-13 at 13:20 +0200, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 18:20 +0530, Shubhangi Shrivastava wrote:
>>>>> intel_dp_detect() is called for not just detection but
>>>>> during modes enumeration as well. Repeating the whole
>>>>> sequence during each of these calls is wasteful and
>>>>> time consuming.
>>>>> This patch moves probing for panel, DPCD read etc done in
>>>>> intel_dp_detect() to a new function intel_dp_long_pulse().
>>>>> Note that the behavior of intel_dp_detect() is changed to
>>>>> report connected or disconnected depending on whether the
>>>>> EDID is available or not.
>>>>> This change will be required by further patches in the series
>>>>> to avoid performing duplicated DPCD operations on hotplug.
>>>>>
>>>>> v2: Moved a hunk to next patch of the series.
>>>>> Moved intel_dp_unset_edid to out. (Ander)
>>>>> v3: Rephrased commit message and intel_dp_unset_dp() is called
>>>>> within intel_dp_set_dp() to free the previous EDID. (Ander)
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested-by: Nathan D Ciobanu <nathan.d.ciobanu@intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>> -----
>>>>> --
>>>>> -
>>>>> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>>>> index 796e3d3..e3b4208 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>>>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static void edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp
>>>>> *intel_dp,
>>>>> bool sync);
>>>>> static void vlv_init_panel_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>>>>> static void vlv_steal_power_sequencer(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>>> enum pipe pipe);
>>>>> +static void intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>>>>>
>>>>> static unsigned int intel_dp_unused_lane_mask(int lane_count)
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -4587,6 +4588,7 @@ intel_dp_set_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>>> struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp
>>>>> ->attached_connector;
>>>>> struct edid *edid;
>>>>>
>>>>> + intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
>>>>> edid = intel_dp_get_edid(intel_dp);
>>>>> intel_connector->detect_edid = edid;
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -4607,9 +4609,10 @@ intel_dp_unset_edid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>>> intel_dp->has_audio = false;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> -static enum drm_connector_status
>>>>> -intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
>>>>> +static void
>>>>> +intel_dp_long_pulse(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
>>>>> {
>>>>> + struct drm_connector *connector = &intel_connector->base;
>>>>> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>>>>> struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port =
>>>>> dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>>>>> struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
>>>>> @@ -4619,17 +4622,6 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>>> bool
>>>>> force)
>>>>> bool ret;
>>>>> u8 sink_irq_vector;
>>>>>
>>>>> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
>>>>> - connector->base.id, connector->name);
>>>>> - intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
>>>>> - /* MST devices are disconnected from a monitor POV */
>>>>> - if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
>>>>> - intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
>>>>> - return connector_status_disconnected;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> power_domain =
>>>>> intel_display_port_aux_power_domain(intel_encoder);
>>>>> intel_display_power_get(to_i915(dev), power_domain);
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -4653,14 +4645,8 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>>> bool
>>>>> force)
>>>>> intel_dp_probe_oui(intel_dp);
>>>>>
>>>>> ret = intel_dp_probe_mst(intel_dp);
>>>>> - if (ret) {
>>>>> - /* if we are in MST mode then this connector
>>>>> - won't appear connected or have anything with EDID on
>>>>> it
>>>>> */
>>>>> - if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
>>>>> - intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
>>>> This deletion is new in this version of the patch. I think we still need
>>>> the
>>>> hunk above, otherwise we might not properly update the encoder type when
>>>> we
>>>> switch from an HDMI sink connected through a level shifter to an MST sink.
>>>>
>>>> Ander
>>>>
>> Encoder type setting for MST is being done in intel_dp_detect(). So,
>> don't find a need to add it here.
> Yes, but that one only covers the case where the device was already previously
> identified as MST. For a device identified as MST by the call to
> intel_dp_probe_mst() in intel_dp_long_pulse(), the encoder type override will
> not be done. Hopefully, Ville's patch that splits the encoder types and makes
> this unnecessary will land soon, but for now just leave the override there.
>
> Ander
Alright.. Moved the overriding of encoder type to be done before probing..
>>>>> - status = connector_status_disconnected;
>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>> goto out;
>>> Also, there is no call to intel_dp_unset_edid() for this case, since the
>>> code
>>> will reach the label 'out' with status being connected. So in this case the
>>> return value of intel_dp_detect() will depend on the stale value of
>>> intel_dp->detect_edid.
>>>
>>> Ander
>> Yes.. Thats right.. Will add a call to intel_dp_unset_edid() in is_mst()
>> check of intel_dp_detect().
Added call to intel_dp_unset_edid() in is_mst() check of intel_dp_detect().
>>>>> - }
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Clearing NACK and defer counts to get their exact values
>>>>> @@ -4691,8 +4677,36 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>>> bool
>>>>> force)
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> out:
>>>>> + if (status != connector_status_connected)
>>>>> + intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
>>>>> intel_display_power_put(to_i915(dev), power_domain);
>>>>> - return status;
>>>>> + return;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static enum drm_connector_status
>>>>> +intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = intel_attached_dp(connector);
>>>>> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port =
>>>>> dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>>>>> + struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
>>>>> + struct intel_connector *intel_connector =
>>>>> to_intel_connector(connector);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s]\n",
>>>>> + connector->base.id, connector->name);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
>>>>> + /* MST devices are disconnected from a monitor POV */
>>>>> + if (intel_encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP)
>>>>> + intel_encoder->type = INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT;
>>>>> + return connector_status_disconnected;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + intel_dp_long_pulse(intel_dp->attached_connector);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (intel_connector->detect_edid)
>>>>> + return connector_status_connected;
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + return connector_status_disconnected;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static void
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-19 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 12:50 [PATCH 0/6] Fixing sink count related detection over Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 11:20 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-13 13:33 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-14 13:50 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-15 10:07 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 10:24 ` [PATCH] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-19 8:51 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava [this message]
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Cleaning up intel_dp_hpd_pulse Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 14:05 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-13 15:04 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 10:52 ` [PATCH] " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 21:05 ` Lukas Wunner
2016-01-19 4:44 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19 8:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-19 8:59 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19 9:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-01-19 9:11 ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-01-19 9:55 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Reorganizing intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-19 8:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_check_link_status Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:00 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 8:56 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: read sink_count dpcd always Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:04 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-18 12:44 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 12:46 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 12:49 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Save sink_count for tracking changes to it and " Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-18 13:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: " Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 8:36 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 12:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: force full detect on sink count change Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-14 13:50 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 8:40 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2016-01-05 13:49 ` ✗ warning: Fi.CI.BAT Patchwork
2016-01-18 10:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev6) Patchwork
2016-01-18 11:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev7) Patchwork
2016-01-18 13:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev8) Patchwork
2016-01-19 9:38 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2016-01-19 10:22 ` Shrivastava, Shubhangi
2016-01-19 10:01 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Fixing sink count related detection over (rev9) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-06 12:28 [PATCH 0/6] Fixing sink count related detection over Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-06 12:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-16 13:40 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-17 6:17 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-17 9:22 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-11-17 11:50 ` Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-02 12:55 [PATCH 0/6] Fixing sink count related detection over Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-02 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Splitting intel_dp_detect Shubhangi Shrivastava
2015-11-02 13:05 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569DF904.20404@intel.com \
--to=shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com \
--cc=conselvan2@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).