From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915: Introduce dedicated object VMA iterator
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:56:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B0B57D.5030901@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160202125805.GK15851@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On 02/02/16 12:58, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 12:10:19PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> On 02/02/16 11:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> #define list_for_each_entry_check(pos, list, member, lock) \
>>> for (typeof(*lock) == typeof(struct mutex) ? assert_lockdep_held(lock) : assert_spin_locked(lock); \
>>> pos = list_first_entry(head, typeof(*pos), member); \
>>> &pos->member != (head); \
>>> pos = list_next_entry(pos, member))
>>>
>>> #define i915_gem_object_for_each_vma(vma, obj) \
>>> list_for_each_entry_check(vma, &(obj)->vma_list, vma_link, &(obj)->base.dev->struct_mutex)
>>>
>>> could be lifted easily, and makes i915_gem_object_for_each_vma() easier
>>> to understand (i.e. serves better as documentation).
>>
>> Don't know, needs buy-in from the relevant people, and depends on
>> how useful to outside of i915 it would be. And if you can make
>> lockdep_assert_held work in this context.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 4004a7cf8db4..931684a74533 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ describe_obj(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> obj->madv == I915_MADV_DONTNEED ? " purgeable" : "");
> if (obj->base.name)
> seq_printf(m, " (name: %d)", obj->base.name);
> - list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, obj_link) {
> + i915_gem_object_for_each_vma(vma, obj) {
> if (vma->pin_count > 0)
> pin_count++;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 31487aa11977..574e45ab43cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -3565,4 +3565,36 @@ int remap_io_mapping(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size,
> struct io_mapping *iomap);
>
> +static __always_inline void __list_check_mutex(struct mutex *lock)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_held(lock);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void __list_check_spin(struct spinlock *lock)
> +{
> + assert_spin_locked(lock);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void __list_check_bug(void *_lock)
> +{
> + BUILD_BUG_ON("unknown lock type");
> +}
> +
> +#define __list_check(lock) \
> + ({ __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(*lock), struct mutex) ? \
> + __list_check_mutex((struct mutex *)lock) : \
> + __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(*lock), struct spinlock) ? \
> + __list_check_spin((struct spinlock *)lock) : \
> + __list_check_bug(lock); \
> + 0; })
> +
> +#define list_for_each_entry_check(pos, head, member, lock) \
> + for (__list_check(lock), \
> + pos = list_first_entry(head, typeof(*pos), member); \
> + &pos->member != (head); \
> + pos = list_next_entry(pos, member))
> +
> +#define i915_gem_object_for_each_vma(vma, obj) \
> + list_for_each_entry_check(vma, &(obj)->vma_list, obj_link, &(obj)->base.dev->struct_mutex)
> +
> #endif
Nice! Want to take it over? ;)
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-02 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-02 11:06 [PATCH 00/12] Misc locking fixes and GEM debugging Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: Add wait_for_us Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 11:57 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 14:04 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 15:43 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 13:35 ` Dave Gordon
2016-02-02 13:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 14:44 ` [PATCH v2 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915: Do not wait atomically for display clocks Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 12:00 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 14:08 ` Dave Gordon
2016-02-02 15:39 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/guc: Do not wait for firmware load atomically Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 14:13 ` Dave Gordon
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/lrc: Do not wait atomically when stopping engines Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915: Kconfig for extra driver debugging Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic wait granularity Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 12:29 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 14:45 ` [PATCH v3 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915: GEM operations need to be done under the big lock Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 12:05 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 14:46 ` [PATCH v4 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 15:49 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-11 10:13 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-15 16:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-02-11 10:07 ` [PATCH " Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915: Fix struct mutex vs. RPS lock inversion Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 13:16 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 14:13 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 14:48 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-11 10:06 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/ilk: Move register read under spinlock Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 12:01 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915: Introduce dedicated object VMA iterator Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 11:36 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 12:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 12:58 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 13:56 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: Introduce dedicated safe " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 11:06 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915: Add BKL asserts to get page helpers Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 11:39 ` Chris Wilson
2016-02-02 12:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-02 11:22 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Misc locking fixes and GEM debugging Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B0B57D.5030901@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).