From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
To: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine@intel.com>,
Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: resize the GuC WOPCM for rc6
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:39:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B21F43.9080206@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160121214140.GB30883@jeffdesk>
On 21/01/16 21:41, Jeff McGee wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:11:01PM +0000, Peter Antoine wrote:
>> This patch resizes the GuC WOPCM to so that the GuC and the RC6 memory
>> spaces do not overlap.
>>
>> Issue: https://jira01.devtools.intel.com/browse/VIZ-6638
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_reg.h | 3 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 6 +++++-
>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_reg.h
>> index 685c799..cb938b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_reg.h
>> @@ -58,7 +58,8 @@
>> #define GUC_MAX_IDLE_COUNT _MMIO(0xC3E4)
>>
>> #define GUC_WOPCM_SIZE _MMIO(0xc050)
>> -#define GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_VALUE (0x80 << 12) /* 512KB */
>> +#define GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_VALUE (0x80 << 12) /* 512KB */
>> +#define BXT_GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_VALUE (0x70 << 12) /* 448KB */
>>
>> /* GuC addresses below GUC_WOPCM_TOP don't map through the GTT */
>> #define GUC_WOPCM_TOP (GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_VALUE)
> Should GUC_WOPCM_TOP be dynamically assigned the proper value, or is it
> sufficient to leave at the max possible WOPCM size? If the later, might be
> worth a comment.
> -Jeff
This isn't the right interpretation of these values.
GUC_WOPCM_TOP is the value defining the top of the GTT address range NOT
available to the GuC and hence where GuC-accessible objects must NOT be
placed.
GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_VALUE is the value written to the GUC_WOPCM_SIZE
register, defining how much WOPCM space CAN be used.
The former is an architectural constant (512K); the latter is a
software-defined boundary between areas of memory within that range that
are used for different purposes.
Therefore, GUC_WOPCM_TOP must NOT be defined in terms of
GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_VALUE, but GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_VALUE could be defined in terms
of GUC_WOPCM_TOP, in particular as (GUC_WOPCM_TOP-reserved).
.Dave.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-03 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-21 18:10 [PATCH v2 0/2] Enabling GuC Loading on Broxton Peter Antoine
2016-01-21 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Adding Broxton GuC Loader Support Peter Antoine
2016-01-21 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: resize the GuC WOPCM for rc6 Peter Antoine
2016-01-21 21:41 ` Jeff McGee
2016-01-22 9:45 ` Peter Antoine
2016-02-03 15:39 ` Dave Gordon [this message]
2016-04-05 16:27 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-04-06 8:32 ` Peter Antoine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56B21F43.9080206@intel.com \
--to=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jeff.mcgee@intel.com \
--cc=peter.antoine@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).