intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thulasimani, Sivakumar" <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/5] drm/i915: move VBT based LVDS presence check to intel_bios.c
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 08:30:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B804D9.7020103@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454668600-22759-2-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com>



On 2/5/2016 4:06 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hide knowledge about VBT child devices in intel_bios.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h   |  1 +
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 53 +--------------------------------------
>   3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 715f200cfbf5..d70ef71d2538 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -3398,6 +3398,7 @@ extern void intel_i2c_reset(struct drm_device *dev);
>   int intel_bios_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>   bool intel_bios_is_valid_vbt(const void *buf, size_t size);
>   bool intel_bios_is_tv_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +bool intel_bios_is_lvds_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 *i2c_pin);
>   
>   /* intel_opregion.c */
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> index 2800ae50465a..f3f4f8e687cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> @@ -1469,3 +1469,53 @@ bool intel_bios_is_tv_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   
>   	return false;
>   }
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_bios_is_lvds_present - is LVDS present in VBT
> + * @dev_priv:	i915 device instance
> + * @i2c_pin:	i2c pin for LVDS if present
> + *
> + * Return true if LVDS is present. If no child devices were parsed from VBT,
> + * assume LVDS is present.
> + */
> +bool intel_bios_is_lvds_present(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 *i2c_pin)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num)
> +		return true;
> +
we check if eDP is supported through following code before the call to
this function. please add this check here so we can avoid vbt 
referencing for that.

intel_lvds.c
  972         if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
  973                 if ((lvds & LVDS_DETECTED) == 0)
  974                         return;
  975                 if (dev_priv->vbt.edp_support) {
  976                         DRM_DEBUG_KMS("disable LVDS for eDP 
support\n");
  977                         return;
  978                 }
  979         }

Sivakumar
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num; i++) {
> +		union child_device_config *uchild = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + i;
> +		struct old_child_dev_config *child = &uchild->old;
> +
> +		/* If the device type is not LFP, continue.
> +		 * We have to check both the new identifiers as well as the
> +		 * old for compatibility with some BIOSes.
> +		 */
> +		if (child->device_type != DEVICE_TYPE_INT_LFP &&
> +		    child->device_type != DEVICE_TYPE_LFP)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (intel_gmbus_is_valid_pin(dev_priv, child->i2c_pin))
> +			*i2c_pin = child->i2c_pin;
> +
> +		/* However, we cannot trust the BIOS writers to populate
> +		 * the VBT correctly.  Since LVDS requires additional
> +		 * information from AIM blocks, a non-zero addin offset is
> +		 * a good indicator that the LVDS is actually present.
> +		 */
> +		if (child->addin_offset)
> +			return true;
> +
> +		/* But even then some BIOS writers perform some black magic
> +		 * and instantiate the device without reference to any
> +		 * additional data.  Trust that if the VBT was written into
> +		 * the OpRegion then they have validated the LVDS's existence.
> +		 */
> +		if (dev_priv->opregion.vbt)
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> index 0da0240caf81..80f8684e5137 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> @@ -772,57 +772,6 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id intel_no_lvds[] = {
>   	{ }	/* terminating entry */
>   };
>   
> -/*
> - * Enumerate the child dev array parsed from VBT to check whether
> - * the LVDS is present.
> - * If it is present, return 1.
> - * If it is not present, return false.
> - * If no child dev is parsed from VBT, it assumes that the LVDS is present.
> - */
> -static bool lvds_is_present_in_vbt(struct drm_device *dev,
> -				   u8 *i2c_pin)
> -{
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> -	int i;
> -
> -	if (!dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num)
> -		return true;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < dev_priv->vbt.child_dev_num; i++) {
> -		union child_device_config *uchild = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + i;
> -		struct old_child_dev_config *child = &uchild->old;
> -
> -		/* If the device type is not LFP, continue.
> -		 * We have to check both the new identifiers as well as the
> -		 * old for compatibility with some BIOSes.
> -		 */
> -		if (child->device_type != DEVICE_TYPE_INT_LFP &&
> -		    child->device_type != DEVICE_TYPE_LFP)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (intel_gmbus_is_valid_pin(dev_priv, child->i2c_pin))
> -			*i2c_pin = child->i2c_pin;
> -
> -		/* However, we cannot trust the BIOS writers to populate
> -		 * the VBT correctly.  Since LVDS requires additional
> -		 * information from AIM blocks, a non-zero addin offset is
> -		 * a good indicator that the LVDS is actually present.
> -		 */
> -		if (child->addin_offset)
> -			return true;
> -
> -		/* But even then some BIOS writers perform some black magic
> -		 * and instantiate the device without reference to any
> -		 * additional data.  Trust that if the VBT was written into
> -		 * the OpRegion then they have validated the LVDS's existence.
> -		 */
> -		if (dev_priv->opregion.vbt)
> -			return true;
> -	}
> -
> -	return false;
> -}
> -
>   static int intel_dual_link_lvds_callback(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
>   {
>   	DRM_INFO("Forcing lvds to dual link mode on %s\n", id->ident);
> @@ -979,7 +928,7 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>   	}
>   
>   	pin = GMBUS_PIN_PANEL;
> -	if (!lvds_is_present_in_vbt(dev, &pin)) {
> +	if (!intel_bios_is_lvds_present(dev_priv, &pin)) {
>   		if ((lvds & LVDS_PORT_EN) == 0) {
>   			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LVDS is not present in VBT\n");
>   			return;

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-08  3:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-05 10:36 [PATCH RESEND 1/5] drm/i915: move VBT based TV presence check to intel_bios.c Jani Nikula
2016-02-05 10:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/5] drm/i915: move VBT based LVDS " Jani Nikula
2016-02-08  3:00   ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar [this message]
2016-02-09 15:12     ` Jani Nikula
2016-02-05 10:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/5] drm/i915: move VBT based eDP port " Jani Nikula
2016-02-05 10:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/5] drm/i915: move VBT based DSI presence " Jani Nikula
2016-02-08  3:17   ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-02-09 15:16     ` Jani Nikula
2016-02-05 10:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 5/5] drm/i915/panel: setup pwm backlight based on connector type Jani Nikula
2016-02-05 11:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [RESEND,1/5] drm/i915: move VBT based TV presence check to intel_bios.c Patchwork
2016-02-08  2:52 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/5] " Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-02-09 15:18   ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56B804D9.7020103@intel.com \
    --to=sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).