intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid divbyzero in modesetting
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:22:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56CB2799.5040101@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CB2193.2060409@linux.intel.com>


On 22/02/16 14:56, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 22-02-16 om 15:27 schreef Tvrtko Ursulin:
>> On 22/02/16 13:09, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> Op 22-02-16 om 12:52 schreef Tvrtko Ursulin:
>>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Not sure if intel_wm_config->num_pipes_active is supposed to
>>>> ever be zero when intel_update_watermarks gets called. But
>>>> since it can be triggered in early platform bringup perhaps
>>>> we want to guard against it rather than divide by zero.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
>>>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 9 +++++++--
>>>>    1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>>>> index feb57598727a..2b7998889617 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>>>> @@ -2831,8 +2831,13 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>>    		nth_active_pipe++;
>>>>    	}
>>>>
>>>> -	pipe_size = ddb_size / config->num_pipes_active;
>>>> -	alloc->start = nth_active_pipe * ddb_size / config->num_pipes_active;
>>>> +	if (WARN_ON(!config->num_pipes_active)) {
>>>> +		pipe_size = 0;
>>>> +		alloc->start = 0;
>>>> +	} else {
>>>> +		pipe_size = ddb_size / config->num_pipes_active;
>>>> +		alloc->start = nth_active_pipe * ddb_size / config->num_pipes_active;
>>>> +	}
>>>>    	alloc->end = alloc->start + pipe_size;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>> How can this happen? It seems in that case cstate->base.active would be false for the current pipe,
>>> and the code should bail early already..
>> Don't know, but does it harm to guard against it? Helps early
>> platform bringup a bit.
>>
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [CRTC:21] hw state readout: enabled
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [CRTC:26] hw state readout: disabled
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [CRTC:31] hw state readout: disabled
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] PORT PLL A hw state readout: crtc_mask 0x00000001, on 0
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] PORT PLL B hw state readout: crtc_mask 0x00000000, on 0
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] PORT PLL C hw state readout: crtc_mask 0x00000000, on 0
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [ENCODER:33:TMDS-33] hw state readout: disabled, pipe A
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [ENCODER:35:DP MST-35] hw state readout: disabled, pipe A
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [ENCODER:36:DP MST-36] hw state readout: disabled, pipe B
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [ENCODER:37:DP MST-37] hw state readout: disabled, pipe C
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [ENCODER:42:TMDS-42] hw state readout: disabled, pipe A
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [ENCODER:44:DP MST-44] hw state readout: disabled, pipe A
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [ENCODER:45:DP MST-45] hw state readout: disabled, pipe B
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [ENCODER:46:DP MST-46] hw state readout: disabled, pipe C
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [CONNECTOR:34:DP-1] hw state readout: disabled
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [CONNECTOR:40:HDMI-A-1] hw state readout: disabled
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [CONNECTOR:43:DP-2] hw state readout: disabled
>>   [drm:intel_modeset_readout_hw_state] [CONNECTOR:47:HDMI-A-2] hw state readout: disabled
>>   [drm:drm_calc_timestamping_constants [drm]] *ERROR* crtc 21: Can't calculate constants, dotclock = 0!
>>   [drm:i915_get_vblank_timestamp] crtc 0 is disabled
>>   [drm:i915_get_vblank_timestamp] crtc 0 is disabled
>>   [drm:i915_get_vblank_timestamp] crtc 0 is disabled
>>   [drm:i915_get_vblank_timestamp] crtc 0 is disabled
>>   [drm:i915_get_vblank_timestamp] crtc 0 is disabled
>>   [drm:i915_get_vblank_timestamp] crtc 0 is disabled
>>   [drm:intel_disable_pipe] disabling pipe A
>>
> Uh oh, we didn't update the atomic state which confused the wm stuff.
>
> Does the below work?

Yep, with your patch it doesn't trigger my would-be-div-by-zero warning 
any more.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-22 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-22 11:52 [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid divbyzero in modesetting Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-22 12:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-02-22 13:09 ` [PATCH] " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-22 14:27   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-02-22 14:56     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-22 15:22       ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-02-23  8:38     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-23  9:49       ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56CB2799.5040101@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).