From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.1 6/8] drm/i915: Nuke fbc members from intel_crtc->atomic, v3.
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:27:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D55255.2060402@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456779986.2408.23.camel@intel.com>
Op 29-02-16 om 22:06 schreef Zanoni, Paulo R:
> Em Seg, 2016-02-29 às 10:58 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst escreveu:
>> Whenever there's an update to the primary plane,
>> fbc_pre_update and fbc_post_update are called. Kill off
>> intel_crtc->atomic.update_fbc and now that intel_crtc->atomic
>> is empty, kill it off too.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Add a intel_fbc_supports_rotation helper.
>> Changes sinec v2:
>> - Remove intel_fbc_supports_rotation_helper.
>> - Remove unrelated changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> This version doesn't change intel_fbc_enable any more!
> Ok, so I decided to test this.
>
> First of all, patch 05 needs a rebase too. I did my own local rebase
> and I suppose I got things right.
>
> Second, after I did actual testing, I discovered that, contrary to my
> previous belief, "old_pri_state" will also be valid when we're only
> changing the sprite or cursor planes. So if we apply this patch, we'll
> be calling pre_update+enable+post_update for every plane/cursor
> enable/disable operation, which is not what we want since these are
> unnecessary calls, as FBC only deals with the primary plane. I think we
> need to fix this.
This is a bug addressed by the next patch.
drm/i915: Do not compute watermarks on a noop.
I'll send the improved version for that. I didn't do it yet because I was waiting for the ILK wm patch to land.
~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-01 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-10 12:49 [PATCH v4 0/8] Kill off intel_crtc->atomic! Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/i915: Pass crtc state to modeset_get_crtc_power_domains Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-17 17:54 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-02-18 9:51 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-18 13:08 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-02-18 13:21 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/i915: Unify power domain handling Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-17 19:54 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-02-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/i915: Kill off intel_crtc->atomic.wait_vblank, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-17 21:20 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-02-18 13:22 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-18 14:14 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-02-18 14:46 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-18 17:02 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-02-24 10:24 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] drm/i915: Kill off intel_crtc->atomic.wait_vblank, v6 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-24 14:50 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-02-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/i915: Remove update_sprite_watermarks Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/i915: Remove some post-commit members from intel_crtc->atomic, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/i915: Nuke fbc " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-12 13:56 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-02-15 14:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-18 17:17 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-02-29 9:58 ` [PATCH v4.1 6/8] drm/i915: Nuke fbc members from intel_crtc->atomic, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-29 21:06 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-03-01 8:27 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2016-02-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/i915: Do not compute watermarks on a noop Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-18 20:51 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-03-01 10:11 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/i915: Remove vblank wait from hsw_enable_ips Maarten Lankhorst
2016-02-12 12:06 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-02-16 10:32 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-03-23 13:33 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] drm/i915: Remove vblank wait from hsw_enable_ips, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-03-23 14:43 ` Zanoni, Paulo R
2016-02-15 13:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Kill off intel_crtc->atomic! (rev8) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56D55255.2060402@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).