public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>,
	Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] intel_engine_cs renaming bomb
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:28:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E1A0BD.8000009@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E18C00.5050906@linux.intel.com>


Hi,

On 10/03/16 15:00, Arun Siluvery wrote:
> On 10/03/2016 14:21, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> I think there is consesus to do this, but the question
>> is whether now is the time to do it?
>>
>> If desired, needs to go in quickly before it goes stale.
>>
>> But if not, it was an interesting exercise of learning
>> Coccinelle nevertheless.
>>
>> Tvrtko Ursulin (5):
>>    drm/i915: Rename local struct intel_engine_cs variables
>>    drm/i915: Rename intel_engine_cs function parameters
>>    drm/i915: Rename intel_engine_cs struct members
>>    drm/i915: More intel_engine_cs renaming
>>    drm/i915: More renaming of rings to engines
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c       |  122 +--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c          |  229 +++--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c              |   12 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h              |   70 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c              |  316 +++---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c      |  168 +--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_debug.c        |   15 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c   |  120 +--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c          |   94 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_render_state.c |   12 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_render_state.h |    2 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c        |  158 +--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c   |   37 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c              |  243 ++---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h            |    6 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c         |  114 +--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c      |   12 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c             |  826 ++++++++-------
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h             |   16 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_mocs.c            |    6 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c         |   60 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c              |   38 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c      | 1425
>> +++++++++++++-------------
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h      |   86 +-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c          |    4 +-
>>   25 files changed, 2132 insertions(+), 2059 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Are the filenames also going to be renamed?

I can't spot any files to rename, which ones you had in mind?

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-10 14:21 [PATCH 0/5] intel_engine_cs renaming bomb Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-10 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Rename local struct intel_engine_cs variables Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-10 14:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Rename intel_engine_cs function parameters Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-10 15:33   ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-10 14:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Rename intel_engine_cs struct members Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-10 15:18   ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-10 15:47   ` [PATCH 3/5 v2] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-10 14:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: More intel_engine_cs renaming Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-10 15:47   ` [PATCH 4/5 v2] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-10 14:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: More renaming of rings to engines Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-10 14:49   ` Chris Wilson
2016-03-10 14:59     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-11 11:38   ` [PATCH v2 " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-11 13:19   ` [PATCH 5/5 v3] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-10 14:52 ` [PATCH 0/5] intel_engine_cs renaming bomb Chris Wilson
2016-03-10 15:00 ` Arun Siluvery
2016-03-10 16:28   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-03-10 16:43     ` Arun Siluvery
2016-03-10 16:47       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-10 15:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-03-10 16:30 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for intel_engine_cs renaming bomb (rev3) Patchwork
2016-03-11  9:49   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-03-11  9:52     ` Arun Siluvery
2016-03-11 12:30 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for intel_engine_cs renaming bomb (rev4) Patchwork
2016-03-11 14:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for intel_engine_cs renaming bomb (rev5) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E1A0BD.8000009@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox