From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Only arm the forcewake release timer on the final put
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:54:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F3F19C.8090009@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160324134234.GM27742@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On 24/03/16 13:42, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:32:53PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> If we arm the release timer on acquiring the forcewake, we will release
>> the forcewake on the jiffie afterwards. If we only arm the release timer
>> on the final put, we will release the forcewake slightly later instead.
>>
>> Much, much worse, we did not acquire a refcount for the armed timing
>> during the get(), and so unbalanced our forcewake counting.
>>
>> Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> index 96799392c2c7..d857168c6c9b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ fw_domain_reset(const struct intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *d)
>> static inline void
>> fw_domain_arm_timer(struct intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *d)
>> {
>> + d->wake_count++;
>> mod_timer_pinned(&d->timer, jiffies + 1);
>
> Which raise the obvious issue that we double increment the counter if
> the timer was pending (where we would only then release it once).
I don't see the bug, we got:
1) __intel_uncore_forcewake_put - if refcount reaches zero it will bump
it and arm the timer to decrement and release. This is used from
explicit get/put paths.
2) __force_wake_get - used from register reads only, so no explicit put
will happen. It just bumps the ref count and arms the timer.
I can't spot the bug, if there is one.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-24 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-24 13:32 [PATCH] drm/i915: Only arm the forcewake release timer on the final put Chris Wilson
2016-03-24 13:42 ` Chris Wilson
2016-03-24 13:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-03-24 14:19 ` Chris Wilson
2016-03-24 14:30 ` Chris Wilson
2016-03-24 14:33 ` Dave Gordon
2016-03-24 14:55 ` Chris Wilson
2016-03-24 13:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2016-03-24 14:38 ` [PATCH] " Dave Gordon
2016-03-24 15:03 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Only arm the forcewake release timer on the final put (rev2) Patchwork
2016-03-24 15:51 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F3F19C.8090009@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).