From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/gen9: Compute DDB allocation at atomic check time
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:45:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57038924.8030706@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459475198-30094-9-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Op 01-04-16 om 03:46 schreef Matt Roper:
> Calculate the DDB blocks needed to satisfy the current atomic
> transaction at atomic check time. This is a prerequisite to calculating
> SKL watermarks during the 'check' phase and rejecting any configurations
> that we can't find valid watermarks for.
>
> Due to the nature of DDB allocation, it's possible for the addition of a
> new CRTC to make the watermark configuration already in use on another,
> unchanged CRTC become invalid. A change in which CRTC's are active
> triggers a recompute of the entire DDB, which unfortunately means we
> need to disallow any other atomic commits from racing with such an
> update. If the active CRTC's change, we need to grab the lock on all
> CRTC's and run all CRTC's through their 'check' handler to recompute and
> re-check their per-CRTC DDB allocations.
>
> Note that with this patch we only compute the DDB allocation but we
> don't actually use the computed values during watermark programming yet.
> For ease of review/testing/bisecting, we still recompute the DDB at
> watermark programming time and just WARN() if it doesn't match the
> precomputed values. A future patch will switch over to using the
> precomputed values once we're sure they're being properly computed.
>
> Another clarifying note: DDB allocation itself shouldn't ever fail with
> the algorithm we use today (i.e., we have enough DDB blocks on BXT to
> support the minimum needs of the worst-case scenario of every pipe/plane
> enabled at full size). However the watermarks calculations based on the
> DDB may fail and we'll be moving those to the atomic check as well in
> future patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 5 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 18 ++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 3 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 79f1974..35cebd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -333,6 +333,10 @@ struct i915_hotplug {
> #define for_each_intel_crtc(dev, intel_crtc) \
> list_for_each_entry(intel_crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, base.head)
>
> +#define for_each_intel_crtc_mask(dev, intel_crtc, crtc_mask) \
> + list_for_each_entry(intel_crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, base.head) \
> + for_each_if ((crtc_mask) & (1 << drm_crtc_index(&intel_crtc->base)))
> +
> #define for_each_intel_encoder(dev, intel_encoder) \
> list_for_each_entry(intel_encoder, \
> &(dev)->mode_config.encoder_list, \
> @@ -587,6 +591,7 @@ struct drm_i915_display_funcs {
> struct intel_crtc_state *newstate);
> void (*initial_watermarks)(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate);
> void (*optimize_watermarks)(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate);
> + int (*compute_global_watermarks)(struct drm_atomic_state *state);
> void (*update_wm)(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
> int (*modeset_calc_cdclk)(struct drm_atomic_state *state);
> void (*modeset_commit_cdclk)(struct drm_atomic_state *state);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index ab1fc3d..6bf2ede 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -13230,6 +13230,7 @@ static int intel_modeset_checks(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> static void calc_watermark_data(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
> struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> struct drm_crtc_state *cstate;
> @@ -13259,6 +13260,10 @@ static void calc_watermark_data(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> pstate->crtc_h != pstate->src_h >> 16)
> intel_state->wm_config.sprites_scaled = true;
> }
> +
> + /* Is there platform-specific watermark information to calculate? */
> + if (dev_priv->display.compute_global_watermarks)
> + dev_priv->display.compute_global_watermarks(state);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -13631,6 +13636,19 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
> modeset_put_power_domains(dev_priv, put_domains[i]);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Temporary sanity check: make sure our pre-computed DDB matches the
> + * one we actually wind up programming.
> + *
> + * Not a great place to put this, but the easiest place we have access
> + * to both the pre-computed and final DDB's; we'll be removing this
> + * check in the next patch anyway.
> + */
> + WARN(IS_GEN9(dev) &&
> + memcmp(&intel_state->ddb, &dev_priv->wm.skl_results.ddb,
> + sizeof(intel_state->ddb)),
> + "Pre-computed DDB does not match final DDB!\n");
> +
> if (intel_state->modeset)
> intel_display_power_put(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_MODESET);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 3b9c084..483261c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ struct intel_atomic_state {
> * don't bother calculating intermediate watermarks.
> */
> bool skip_intermediate_wm;
> +
> + /* Gen9+ only */
> + struct skl_ddb_allocation ddb;
> };
>
> struct intel_plane_state {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index e0ca2b9..8e283cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3736,6 +3736,58 @@ static void skl_clear_wm(struct skl_wm_values *watermarks, enum pipe pipe)
>
> }
>
> +static int
> +skl_compute_ddb(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
> + struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
> + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
> + unsigned realloc_pipes = intel_state->active_crtcs;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * If the modeset changes which CRTC's are active, we need to
> + * recompute the DDB allocation for *all* active pipes, even
> + * those that weren't otherwise being modified in any way by this
> + * atomic commit. Due to the shrinking of the per-pipe allocations
> + * when new active CRTC's are added, it's possible for a pipe that
> + * we were already using and aren't changing at all here to suddenly
> + * become invalid if its DDB needs exceeds its new allocation.
> + *
> + * Note that if we wind up doing a full DDB recompute, we can't let
> + * any other display updates race with this transaction, so we need
> + * to grab the lock on *all* CRTC's.
> + */
> + if (intel_state->active_crtcs != to_i915(dev)->active_crtcs)
> + realloc_pipes = ~0;
> +
As I noted in the previous patch you're not allowed to look at active_crtcs like this.
I would just go with if (intel_state->modeset here), and look only at crtcs part of the state. Not at intel_state->active_crtcs.
If the ddb allocation for any crtc part of the state changes then you would add all acive crtcs. Don't be afraid to just lock all, including the disabled crtcs. :)
~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-05 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-01 1:46 [PATCH 00/16] Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks Matt Roper
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915: Reorganize WM structs/unions in CRTC state Matt Roper
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915: Make skl_plane_relative_data_rate use passed " Matt Roper
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915: Rename s/skl_compute_pipe_wm/skl_build_pipe_wm/ Matt Roper
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/skl+: Use plane size for relative data rate calculation Matt Roper
2016-04-06 15:09 ` Imre Deak
2016-04-06 18:05 ` Matt Roper
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/gen9: Allow calculation of data rate for in-flight state Matt Roper
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915: Ensure intel_state->active_crtcs is always set Matt Roper
2016-04-05 9:29 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/gen9: Allow skl_allocate_pipe_ddb() to operate on in-flight state Matt Roper
2016-04-05 9:35 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-14 1:58 ` Matt Roper
2016-04-18 12:56 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/gen9: Compute DDB allocation at atomic check time Matt Roper
2016-04-05 9:45 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/gen9: Drop re-allocation of DDB at atomic commit Matt Roper
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/gen9: Calculate plane WM's from state Matt Roper
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/gen9: Allow watermark calculation on in-flight atomic state Matt Roper
2016-04-05 9:52 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/gen9: Use a bitmask to track dirty pipe watermarks Matt Roper
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/gen9: Propagate watermark calculation failures up the call chain Matt Roper
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/gen9: Calculate watermarks during atomic 'check' Matt Roper
2016-04-05 13:01 ` Patrik Jakobsson
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/gen9: Reject display updates that exceed wm limitations Matt Roper
2016-04-01 1:46 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915: Remove wm_config from dev_priv/intel_atomic_state Matt Roper
2016-04-05 10:14 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-01 9:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57038924.8030706@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox