public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/gen9: Allow watermark calculation on in-flight atomic state
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:52:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57038AFA.8020603@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459475198-30094-12-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Op 01-04-16 om 03:46 schreef Matt Roper:
> In an upcoming patch we'll move this calculation to the atomic 'check'
> phase so that the display update can be rejected early if no valid
> watermark programming is possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 483261c..6471f69 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1667,6 +1667,27 @@ intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>  	return to_intel_plane_state(plane_state);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * If cstate is in-flight, return in-flight plane state, otherwise
> + * return committed plane state.
> + */
> +static inline struct intel_plane_state *
> +intel_pstate_for_cstate_plane(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
> +			      struct intel_plane *plane)
> +{
> +	struct drm_atomic_state *state = cstate->base.state;
> +	struct drm_plane_state *pstate;
> +
> +	if (state == NULL)
> +		return to_intel_plane_state(plane->base.state);
> +
> +	pstate = drm_atomic_get_plane_state(state, &plane->base);
> +
> +	return to_intel_plane_state(pstate);
> +}
> +
Don't create a helper please, this should only be done when transitioning code situations.

plane->base.state might not be the right state when we support more than 1 pending atomic commit.

~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-05  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-01  1:46 [PATCH 00/16] Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks Matt Roper
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915: Reorganize WM structs/unions in CRTC state Matt Roper
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915: Make skl_plane_relative_data_rate use passed " Matt Roper
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915: Rename s/skl_compute_pipe_wm/skl_build_pipe_wm/ Matt Roper
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/skl+: Use plane size for relative data rate calculation Matt Roper
2016-04-06 15:09   ` Imre Deak
2016-04-06 18:05     ` Matt Roper
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/gen9: Allow calculation of data rate for in-flight state Matt Roper
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915: Ensure intel_state->active_crtcs is always set Matt Roper
2016-04-05  9:29   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/gen9: Allow skl_allocate_pipe_ddb() to operate on in-flight state Matt Roper
2016-04-05  9:35   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-14  1:58     ` Matt Roper
2016-04-18 12:56       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/gen9: Compute DDB allocation at atomic check time Matt Roper
2016-04-05  9:45   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/gen9: Drop re-allocation of DDB at atomic commit Matt Roper
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/gen9: Calculate plane WM's from state Matt Roper
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/gen9: Allow watermark calculation on in-flight atomic state Matt Roper
2016-04-05  9:52   ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/gen9: Use a bitmask to track dirty pipe watermarks Matt Roper
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/gen9: Propagate watermark calculation failures up the call chain Matt Roper
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/gen9: Calculate watermarks during atomic 'check' Matt Roper
2016-04-05 13:01   ` Patrik Jakobsson
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/gen9: Reject display updates that exceed wm limitations Matt Roper
2016-04-01  1:46 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915: Remove wm_config from dev_priv/intel_atomic_state Matt Roper
2016-04-05 10:14   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-01  9:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Pre-calculate SKL-style atomic watermarks Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57038AFA.8020603@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox