From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Eliminating the execlist retired request queue
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:19:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <570B6C21.2050701@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160409080344.GA7377@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On 09/04/16 09:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 02:54:54PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> Retired request queue coupled with retired work handler is a scalability
>> concern on some workloads of which one dramatic example is gem_close_race.
>>
>> This series depend on i915_gem_object_pin_map series by Chris Wilson.
>
> My biggest concern with this is that this touches code that has a known
> GPF and so imo cannot be tested until that *regression* has been fixed.
That's the ringbuffer one or something else?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-11 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-08 13:54 [RFC 0/4] Eliminating the execlist retired request queue Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 13:54 ` [RFC 1/4] drm/i915: Move releasing of the GEM request from free to retire/cancel Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 15:01 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11 9:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 13:54 ` [RFC 2/4] drm/i915/guc: Keep the previous context pinned until the next one has been completed Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 14:37 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11 8:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 13:54 ` [RFC 3/4] drm/i915: Use new i915_gem_object_pin_map for LRC Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 14:40 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11 9:05 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-11 9:18 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-08 13:54 ` [RFC 4/4] drm/i915: Stop tracking execlists retired requests Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 14:57 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11 9:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-11 9:23 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11 9:26 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-08 14:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Eliminating the execlist retired request queue Patchwork
2016-04-09 8:03 ` [RFC 0/4] " Chris Wilson
2016-04-11 9:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-04-11 10:20 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=570B6C21.2050701@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox