public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Fix gen8 semaphores id for legacy mode
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:36:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57231D15.10503@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461860672-12623-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


On 28/04/16 17:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
> With the introduction of a distinct engine->id vs the hardware id, we need
> to fix up the value we use for selecting the target engine when signaling
> a semaphore. Note that these values can be merged with engine->guc_id.

So I broke something more with the decoupling, did not realize. I 
suppose it was still worth it. This at least wasn't being used.

Regards,

Tvrtko


> Fixes: de1add360522c876c25ef2bbbbab1c94bdb509ab
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 9 +++++++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 3 ++-
>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 138afed82682..9761443bcfdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static int gen8_rcs_signal(struct drm_i915_gem_request *signaller_req,
>   		intel_ring_emit(signaller, seqno);
>   		intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0);
>   		intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL |
> -					   MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id));
> +					   MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->hw_id));
>   		intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0);
>   	}
>
> @@ -1348,7 +1348,7 @@ static int gen8_xcs_signal(struct drm_i915_gem_request *signaller_req,
>   		intel_ring_emit(signaller, upper_32_bits(gtt_offset));
>   		intel_ring_emit(signaller, seqno);
>   		intel_ring_emit(signaller, MI_SEMAPHORE_SIGNAL |
> -					   MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->id));
> +					   MI_SEMAPHORE_TARGET(waiter->hw_id));
>   		intel_ring_emit(signaller, 0);
>   	}
>
> @@ -2759,6 +2759,7 @@ int intel_init_render_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
>   	engine->name = "render ring";
>   	engine->id = RCS;
>   	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_RENDER;
> +	engine->hw_id = 0;
>   	engine->mmio_base = RENDER_RING_BASE;
>
>   	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) {
> @@ -2909,6 +2910,7 @@ int intel_init_bsd_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
>   	engine->name = "bsd ring";
>   	engine->id = VCS;
>   	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_BSD;
> +	engine->hw_id = 1;
>
>   	engine->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
>   	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) {
> @@ -2987,6 +2989,7 @@ int intel_init_bsd2_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
>   	engine->name = "bsd2 ring";
>   	engine->id = VCS2;
>   	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_BSD;
> +	engine->hw_id = 4;
>
>   	engine->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
>   	engine->mmio_base = GEN8_BSD2_RING_BASE;
> @@ -3019,6 +3022,7 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
>   	engine->name = "blitter ring";
>   	engine->id = BCS;
>   	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_BLT;
> +	engine->hw_id = 2;
>
>   	engine->mmio_base = BLT_RING_BASE;
>   	engine->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
> @@ -3078,6 +3082,7 @@ int intel_init_vebox_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
>   	engine->name = "video enhancement ring";
>   	engine->id = VECS;
>   	engine->exec_id = I915_EXEC_VEBOX;
> +	engine->hw_id = 3;
>
>   	engine->mmio_base = VEBOX_RING_BASE;
>   	engine->write_tail = ring_write_tail;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 7023e88531b5..2651fd5263eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -153,7 +153,8 @@ struct  intel_engine_cs {
>   #define I915_NUM_ENGINES 5
>   #define _VCS(n) (VCS + (n))
>   	unsigned int exec_id;
> -	unsigned int guc_id;
> +	unsigned int hw_id;
> +	unsigned int guc_id; /* XXX same as hw_id? */
>   	u32		mmio_base;
>   	struct		drm_device *dev;
>   	struct intel_ringbuffer *buffer;
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-29  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-28 16:24 [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Apply strongly ordered RCS breadcrumb to gen8/legacy Chris Wilson
2016-04-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Fix ordering of sanitize ppgtt and sanitize execlists Chris Wilson
2016-04-28 18:48   ` Dave Gordon
2016-04-29 10:59   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-04-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Fix gen8 semaphores id for legacy mode Chris Wilson
2016-04-29  8:36   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-04-29  8:49     ` Chris Wilson
2016-05-04 11:35       ` Dave Gordon
2016-05-04 11:44         ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: Fix serialisation of pipecontrol write vs semaphore signal Chris Wilson
2016-04-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Reload PD tables after semaphore wait on gen8 Chris Wilson
2016-04-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Bump reserved size for legacy gen8 semaphore emission Chris Wilson
2016-04-29  7:40   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-04-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: Trim the flush for the legacy request emission Chris Wilson
2016-04-29  7:43   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-04-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Trim the flush for the execlists " Chris Wilson
2016-04-29  7:49   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2016-04-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Enable semaphores for legacy submission on gen8 Chris Wilson
2016-05-02  8:56   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-04-28 16:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Enable legacy/semaphores for CI Chris Wilson
2016-04-28 16:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [01/10] drm/i915: Apply strongly ordered RCS breadcrumb to gen8/legacy Patchwork
2016-04-29  8:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] " Joonas Lahtinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57231D15.10503@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox