From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/guc: pass request (not client) to i915_guc_{wq_check_space, submit}()
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:08:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57237907.4020808@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461780195-17434-2-git-send-email-david.s.gordon@intel.com>
On 27/04/16 19:03, Dave Gordon wrote:
> The knowledge of how to derive the relevant client from the request
> should be localised within i915_guc_submission.c; the LRC code shouldn't
> have to know about the internal details of the GuC submission process.
> And all the information the GuC code needs should be encapsulated in (or
> reachable from) the request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 11 ++++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h | 5 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 9 +++------
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> index 42d2efa..66af5ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
> @@ -451,10 +451,11 @@ static void guc_fini_ctx_desc(struct intel_guc *guc,
> sizeof(desc) * client->ctx_index);
> }
>
> -int i915_guc_wq_check_space(struct i915_guc_client *gc)
> +int i915_guc_wq_check_space(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> {
> + const size_t size = sizeof(struct guc_wq_item);
All the other variables passed to CIRC_SPACE are u32 so this is for the
worse I think.
> + struct i915_guc_client *gc = request->i915->guc.execbuf_client;
> struct guc_process_desc *desc;
> - u32 size = sizeof(struct guc_wq_item);
> int ret = -ETIMEDOUT, timeout_counter = 200;
>
> if (!gc)
> @@ -537,11 +538,11 @@ static int guc_add_workqueue_item(struct i915_guc_client *gc,
> *
> * Return: 0 if succeed
> */
> -int i915_guc_submit(struct i915_guc_client *client,
> - struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
> +int i915_guc_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
> {
> - struct intel_guc *guc = client->guc;
> unsigned int engine_id = rq->engine->guc_id;
> + struct intel_guc *guc = &rq->i915->guc;
> + struct i915_guc_client *client = guc->execbuf_client;
> int q_ret, b_ret;
>
> q_ret = guc_add_workqueue_item(client, rq);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
> index 9d79c4c..b37c731 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
> @@ -148,10 +148,9 @@ extern int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_device *dev);
> /* i915_guc_submission.c */
> int i915_guc_submission_init(struct drm_device *dev);
> int i915_guc_submission_enable(struct drm_device *dev);
> -int i915_guc_submit(struct i915_guc_client *client,
> - struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq);
> +int i915_guc_wq_check_space(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq);
> +int i915_guc_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq);
> void i915_guc_submission_disable(struct drm_device *dev);
> void i915_guc_submission_fini(struct drm_device *dev);
> -int i915_guc_wq_check_space(struct i915_guc_client *client);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 2b7e6bb..b8ec8c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -708,9 +708,7 @@ int intel_logical_ring_alloc_request_extras(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request
> * going any further, as the i915_add_request() call
> * later on mustn't fail ...
> */
> - struct intel_guc *guc = &request->i915->guc;
> -
> - ret = i915_guc_wq_check_space(guc->execbuf_client);
> + ret = i915_guc_wq_check_space(request);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -776,7 +774,6 @@ static int logical_ring_wait_for_space(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
> {
> struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf = request->ringbuf;
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = request->i915;
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
>
> intel_logical_ring_advance(ringbuf);
> @@ -806,8 +803,8 @@ static int logical_ring_wait_for_space(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> }
> }
>
> - if (dev_priv->guc.execbuf_client)
> - i915_guc_submit(dev_priv->guc.execbuf_client, request);
> + if (i915.enable_guc_submission)
> + i915_guc_submit(request);
> else
> execlists_context_queue(request);
>
>
With the datatype fix (revert) in i915_guc_wq_check_space:
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-27 18:03 [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915/guc: add enable_guc_loading parameter Dave Gordon
2016-04-27 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/guc: pass request (not client) to i915_guc_{wq_check_space, submit}() Dave Gordon
2016-04-29 15:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-05-03 19:22 ` Dave Gordon
2016-05-04 8:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-27 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915/guc: don't spinwait if the GuC's workqueue is full Dave Gordon
2016-04-29 15:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-06 17:12 ` Dave Gordon
2016-04-29 15:45 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-06 15:17 ` Dave Gordon
2016-05-10 14:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-27 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/guc: rework guc_add_workqueue_item() Dave Gordon
2016-04-29 15:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-29 16:10 ` Chris Wilson
2016-05-03 10:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-05 18:38 ` Dave Gordon
2016-05-06 8:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-06 15:06 ` Dave Gordon
2016-04-27 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] DO NOT MERGE: change default to using GuC submission if possible Dave Gordon
2016-04-28 6:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/5] drm/i915/guc: add enable_guc_loading parameter Patchwork
2016-04-29 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-06 16:39 ` Dave Gordon
2016-05-10 14:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-13 14:36 ` Dave Gordon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57237907.4020808@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox