From: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/guc: pass request (not client) to i915_guc_{wq_check_space, submit}()
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 20:22:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5728FA5D.4050907@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57237907.4020808@linux.intel.com>
On 29/04/16 16:08, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 27/04/16 19:03, Dave Gordon wrote:
>> The knowledge of how to derive the relevant client from the request
>> should be localised within i915_guc_submission.c; the LRC code shouldn't
>> have to know about the internal details of the GuC submission process.
>> And all the information the GuC code needs should be encapsulated in (or
>> reachable from) the request.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h | 5 ++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 9 +++------
>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> index 42d2efa..66af5ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> @@ -451,10 +451,11 @@ static void guc_fini_ctx_desc(struct intel_guc
>> *guc,
>> sizeof(desc) * client->ctx_index);
>> }
>>
>> -int i915_guc_wq_check_space(struct i915_guc_client *gc)
>> +int i915_guc_wq_check_space(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
>> {
>> + const size_t size = sizeof(struct guc_wq_item);
>
> All the other variables passed to CIRC_SPACE are u32 so this is for the
> worse I think.
This isn't passed to CIRC_SPACE; this is what the result of CIRC_SPACE
is compared against. As it's a constant, gcc knows how big it needs to
be to correctly represent its actual value, so whether this is the
logically correct "size_t" (as it represents a size) or the practical
"u32" or even "u8" (as we know it will fit), the generated code is
identical (and I'd hope the compiler would warn us if it made a
difference, e.g. using u8 for a sizeof() expression greater than 256).
Interestingly, the expected value "sizeof(struct work_queue_item)" is
16, but that doesn't appear in the code at all -- instead gcc compares
against 15 so it can use "jbe" (Jump if Below or Equal) to get
unsigned-comparison semantics.
.Dave.
>> + struct i915_guc_client *gc = request->i915->guc.execbuf_client;
>> struct guc_process_desc *desc;
>> - u32 size = sizeof(struct guc_wq_item);
>> int ret = -ETIMEDOUT, timeout_counter = 200;
>>
>> if (!gc)
>> @@ -537,11 +538,11 @@ static int guc_add_workqueue_item(struct
>> i915_guc_client *gc,
>> *
>> * Return: 0 if succeed
>> */
>> -int i915_guc_submit(struct i915_guc_client *client,
>> - struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
>> +int i915_guc_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
>> {
>> - struct intel_guc *guc = client->guc;
>> unsigned int engine_id = rq->engine->guc_id;
>> + struct intel_guc *guc = &rq->i915->guc;
>> + struct i915_guc_client *client = guc->execbuf_client;
>> int q_ret, b_ret;
>>
>> q_ret = guc_add_workqueue_item(client, rq);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
>> index 9d79c4c..b37c731 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
>> @@ -148,10 +148,9 @@ extern int intel_guc_resume(struct drm_device *dev);
>> /* i915_guc_submission.c */
>> int i915_guc_submission_init(struct drm_device *dev);
>> int i915_guc_submission_enable(struct drm_device *dev);
>> -int i915_guc_submit(struct i915_guc_client *client,
>> - struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq);
>> +int i915_guc_wq_check_space(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq);
>> +int i915_guc_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq);
>> void i915_guc_submission_disable(struct drm_device *dev);
>> void i915_guc_submission_fini(struct drm_device *dev);
>> -int i915_guc_wq_check_space(struct i915_guc_client *client);
>>
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> index 2b7e6bb..b8ec8c6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>> @@ -708,9 +708,7 @@ int intel_logical_ring_alloc_request_extras(struct
>> drm_i915_gem_request *request
>> * going any further, as the i915_add_request() call
>> * later on mustn't fail ...
>> */
>> - struct intel_guc *guc = &request->i915->guc;
>> -
>> - ret = i915_guc_wq_check_space(guc->execbuf_client);
>> + ret = i915_guc_wq_check_space(request);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -776,7 +774,6 @@ static int logical_ring_wait_for_space(struct
>> drm_i915_gem_request *req,
>> intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request
>> *request)
>> {
>> struct intel_ringbuffer *ringbuf = request->ringbuf;
>> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = request->i915;
>> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
>>
>> intel_logical_ring_advance(ringbuf);
>> @@ -806,8 +803,8 @@ static int logical_ring_wait_for_space(struct
>> drm_i915_gem_request *req,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - if (dev_priv->guc.execbuf_client)
>> - i915_guc_submit(dev_priv->guc.execbuf_client, request);
>> + if (i915.enable_guc_submission)
>> + i915_guc_submit(request);
>> else
>> execlists_context_queue(request);
>>
>>
>
> With the datatype fix (revert) in i915_guc_wq_check_space:
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-03 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-27 18:03 [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915/guc: add enable_guc_loading parameter Dave Gordon
2016-04-27 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915/guc: pass request (not client) to i915_guc_{wq_check_space, submit}() Dave Gordon
2016-04-29 15:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-03 19:22 ` Dave Gordon [this message]
2016-05-04 8:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-27 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915/guc: don't spinwait if the GuC's workqueue is full Dave Gordon
2016-04-29 15:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-06 17:12 ` Dave Gordon
2016-04-29 15:45 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-06 15:17 ` Dave Gordon
2016-05-10 14:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-27 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/guc: rework guc_add_workqueue_item() Dave Gordon
2016-04-29 15:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-29 16:10 ` Chris Wilson
2016-05-03 10:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-05 18:38 ` Dave Gordon
2016-05-06 8:55 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-06 15:06 ` Dave Gordon
2016-04-27 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] DO NOT MERGE: change default to using GuC submission if possible Dave Gordon
2016-04-28 6:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/5] drm/i915/guc: add enable_guc_loading parameter Patchwork
2016-04-29 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-06 16:39 ` Dave Gordon
2016-05-10 14:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-05-13 14:36 ` Dave Gordon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5728FA5D.4050907@intel.com \
--to=david.s.gordon@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox