public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915: Limit fb x offset due to fences
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 15:49:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <572B1E15.2030703@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462290001-9246-8-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>

On Tuesday 03 May 2016 09:09 PM, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> If there's a fence on the object it will be aligned to the start
> of the object, and hence CPU rendering to any fb that straddles
> the fence edge will come out wrong due to lines wrapping at the
> wrong place.
>
> We have no API to manage fences on a sub-object level, so we can't
> really fix this in any way. Additonally gen2/3 fences are rather
> coarse grained so adjusting the offset migth not even be possible.
>
> Avoid these problems by requiring the fb layout to agree with the
> fence layout (if present).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 68612a5fac3d..438f3bd86e48 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -2504,6 +2504,22 @@ intel_fill_fb_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>   		intel_fb_offset_to_xy(&x, &y, fb, i);
>   
>   		/*
> +		 * The fence (if used) is aligned to the start of the object
> +		 * so having the framebuffer wrap around across the edge of the
> +		 * fenced region doesn't really work. We have no API to configure
> +		 * the fence start offset within the object (nor could we probably
> +		 * on gen2/3). So it's just easier if we just require that the
> +		 * fb layout agrees with the fence layout. We already check that the
> +		 * fb stride matches the fence stride elsewhere.
> +		 */
> +		if (intel_fb->obj->tiling_mode != I915_TILING_NONE &&
> +		    (x + width) * cpp > fb->pitches[i]) {
> +			DRM_DEBUG("bad fb plane %d offset: 0x%x\n",
> +				  i, fb->offsets[i]);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
>   		 * First pixel of the framebuffer from
>   		 * the start of the normal gtt mapping.
>   		 */

-- 
regards,
Sivakumar Thulasimani

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-05 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-03 15:39 [PATCH v4 00/12] drm/i915: Handle fb->offsets[] and rewrite fb rotation handling to be more generic (v4) ville.syrjala
2016-05-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] drm/i915: Rewrite fb rotation GTT handling ville.syrjala
2016-05-05  8:12   ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-05-05  8:14   ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-05-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] drm/i915: Don't pass pitch to intel_compute_page_offset() ville.syrjala
2016-05-05  8:17   ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-05-03 15:39 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915: Move SKL hw stride calculation into a helper ville.syrjala
2016-05-04 11:53   ` Matthew Auld
2016-05-05  8:20   ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-05-03 15:39 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Pass around plane_state instead of fb+rotation ville.syrjala
2016-05-05  8:21   ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-05-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915: Use fb modifiers for display tiling decisions ville.syrjala
2016-05-03 15:39 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915: Adjust obj tiling vs. fb modifier rules ville.syrjala
2016-05-03 15:39 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915: Limit fb x offset due to fences ville.syrjala
2016-05-05 10:19   ` Sivakumar Thulasimani [this message]
2016-05-03 15:39 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915: Allow calling intel_adjust_tile_offset() multiple times ville.syrjala
2016-05-27  8:23   ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-30 10:14     ` Thulasimani, Sivakumar
2016-05-03 15:39 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915: Make intel_adjust_tile_offset() work for linear buffers ville.syrjala
2016-05-09  9:24   ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2016-05-03 15:39 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915: Compute display surface offset in the plane check hook for SKL+ ville.syrjala
2016-05-09 10:30   ` Sivakumar Thulasimani
2016-05-03 15:40 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: Deal with NV12 CbCr plane AUX surface on SKL+ ville.syrjala
2016-05-03 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915: Make sure fb offset is (macro)pixel aligned ville.syrjala
2016-05-03 16:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Handle fb->offsets[] and rewrite fb rotation handling to be more generic (v4) Patchwork
2016-05-27 11:43   ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-27 11:49     ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=572B1E15.2030703@intel.com \
    --to=sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox