From: "Jindal, Sonika" <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Runyan, Arthur J" <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>,
"Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 15:06:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <573D8911.3060002@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160518182635.GE4329@intel.com>
On 5/18/2016 11:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:47:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> The definitions for the error register should be valid on bdw/skl too,
>> but there we haven't even enabled DE_MISC handling yet.
>>
>> Somewhat confusing the the moved register offset on bdw is only for
>> the _CTL/_AUX register, and that _IIR/IMR stayed where they have been
>> on bdw.
>>
>> v2: Fixes from Ville.
>>
>> v3: Drop the REG_WRITE masking since edp interrupt still work and we
>> still enter PSR.
>>
>> Cc: "Runyan, Arthur J" <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
>> Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
>> Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> I guess we might enable the error interrupt unconditionally, but the
> entry/exit interrupts are going to cause constant dmesg spam, so those I
> don't think we want enabled normally. Might be interesting to have some
> kind of debug knob for those though.
>
> Hmm. Actually is the PSR error interrupt tied to the "error interrupt"
> bit in the PSR AUX register? We don't enable that bit, so maybe we can't
> actually get the error interrupt?
Only bit 2 (SRD Aux Error) must be tied to the error interrupt bit of
SRD_AUX register.
The entry and exit interrupts should be independent as per my understanding.
I agree the entry/exit messages will be too much in dmesg.
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 10 ++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> index f0d941455bed..579f582ef987 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> @@ -2185,6 +2185,26 @@ static void ilk_display_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> ironlake_rps_change_irq_handler(dev_priv);
>> }
>>
>> +static void hsw_edp_psr_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> + u32 edp_psr_iir = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_IIR);
>> +
>> + if (edp_psr_iir & EDP_PSR_ERROR)
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR error\n");
>> +
>> + if (edp_psr_iir & EDP_PSR_PRE_ENTRY) {
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR prepare entry in 2 vblanks\n");
>> + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_IMR, EDP_PSR_PRE_ENTRY);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (edp_psr_iir & EDP_PSR_POST_EXIT) {
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR exit completed\n");
>> + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_IMR, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_IIR, edp_psr_iir);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void ivb_display_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> u32 de_iir)
>> {
>> @@ -2197,6 +2217,9 @@ static void ivb_display_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> if (de_iir & DE_ERR_INT_IVB)
>> ivb_err_int_handler(dev_priv);
>>
>> + if (de_iir & DE_EDP_PSR_INT_HSW)
>> + hsw_edp_psr_irq_handler(dev_priv);
>> +
>> if (de_iir & DE_AUX_CHANNEL_A_IVB)
>> dp_aux_irq_handler(dev_priv);
>>
>> @@ -3381,6 +3404,11 @@ static void ironlake_irq_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
>> if (IS_GEN7(dev))
>> I915_WRITE(GEN7_ERR_INT, 0xffffffff);
>>
>> + if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
>> + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_IMR, 0xffffffff);
>> + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_IIR, 0xffffffff);
>> + }
>> +
>> gen5_gt_irq_reset(dev);
>>
>> ibx_irq_reset(dev);
>> @@ -3676,6 +3704,7 @@ static int ironlake_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
>> DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB | DE_PLANEC_FLIP_DONE_IVB |
>> DE_PLANEB_FLIP_DONE_IVB |
>> DE_PLANEA_FLIP_DONE_IVB | DE_AUX_CHANNEL_A_IVB);
>> +
extra line.
>> extra_mask = (DE_PIPEC_VBLANK_IVB | DE_PIPEB_VBLANK_IVB |
>> DE_PIPEA_VBLANK_IVB | DE_ERR_INT_IVB |
>> DE_DP_A_HOTPLUG_IVB);
>> @@ -3690,6 +3719,12 @@ static int ironlake_irq_postinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
>> DE_DP_A_HOTPLUG);
>> }
>>
>> + if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) {
>> + gen5_assert_iir_is_zero(dev_priv, EDP_PSR_IIR);
>> + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_IMR, 0);
>> + display_mask |= DE_EDP_PSR_INT_HSW;
>> + }
>> +
>> dev_priv->irq_mask = ~display_mask;
>>
>> I915_WRITE(HWSTAM, 0xeffe);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 86fbf723eca7..0f99e67f2114 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -3225,6 +3225,13 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>> #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us (3<<4)
>> #define EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT 0
>>
>> +/* Bspec claims those aren't shifted but stay at 0x64800 */
>> +#define EDP_PSR_IMR _MMIO(0x64834)
>> +#define EDP_PSR_IIR _MMIO(0x64838)
>> +#define EDP_PSR_ERROR (1<<2)
>> +#define EDP_PSR_POST_EXIT (1<<1)
>> +#define EDP_PSR_PRE_ENTRY (1<<0)
>> +
>> #define EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL _MMIO(dev_priv->psr_mmio_base + 0x10)
>> #define EDP_PSR_AUX_DATA(i) _MMIO(dev_priv->psr_mmio_base + 0x14 + (i) * 4) /* 5 registers */
>>
>> @@ -3259,6 +3266,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>> #define EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP (1<<27)
>> #define EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP (1<<26)
>> #define EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD (1<<25)
>> +#define EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_REG_WRITE (1<<16)
Is this remaining from some previous version? or left intentionally?
>>
>> #define EDP_PSR2_CTL _MMIO(0x6f900)
>> #define EDP_PSR2_ENABLE (1<<31)
>> @@ -5886,6 +5894,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>> #define DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB (1<<28)
>> #define DE_DP_A_HOTPLUG_IVB (1<<27)
>> #define DE_AUX_CHANNEL_A_IVB (1<<26)
>> +#define DE_EDP_PSR_INT_HSW (1<<19)
>> #define DE_SPRITEC_FLIP_DONE_IVB (1<<14)
>> #define DE_PLANEC_FLIP_DONE_IVB (1<<13)
>> #define DE_PIPEC_VBLANK_IVB (1<<10)
>> @@ -5998,6 +6007,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>> #define GEN8_DE_MISC_IIR _MMIO(0x44468)
>> #define GEN8_DE_MISC_IER _MMIO(0x4446c)
>> #define GEN8_DE_MISC_GSE (1 << 27)
>> +#define GEN8_DE_EDP_PSR (1 << 19)
We are not enabling it for bdw now right?
>>
>> #define GEN8_PCU_ISR _MMIO(0x444e0)
>> #define GEN8_PCU_IMR _MMIO(0x444e4)
>> --
>> 2.8.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-19 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-18 16:47 [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/psr: Try to program link training times correctly Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 17:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-18 18:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 18:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-19 10:50 ` Jindal, Sonika
2016-05-20 7:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/psr: Make idle_frames sensible again Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 17:46 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-25 22:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/psr: Skip aux handeshake if the vbt tells us to Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 17:47 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/psr: Order DP aux transactions correctly Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 17:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/psr: Use ->get_aux_send_ctl functions Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 18:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-18 16:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/psr: Implement PSR2 w/a for skl/kbl Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 18:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-18 18:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 22:07 ` Runyan, Arthur J
2016-05-19 7:14 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Implement PSR2 w/a for gen9 Daniel Vetter
2016-05-19 8:55 ` Jindal, Sonika
2016-05-20 7:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-18 17:17 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/7] drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw Patchwork
2016-05-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-19 9:36 ` Jindal, Sonika [this message]
2016-05-19 8:01 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [1/7] drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw (rev2) Patchwork
2016-05-20 7:48 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=573D8911.3060002@intel.com \
--to=sonika.jindal@intel.com \
--cc=arthur.j.runyan@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox