From: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
To: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Remove mostly duplicated video DIP handling from PSR code
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:39:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575EA28B.8020705@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464897332-25503-7-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Regards
Shashank
On 6/3/2016 1:25 AM, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Now that the infoframe hooks are part of the intel_dig_port, we can use
> the normal .write_infoframe() hook to update the VSC SDP. We do need to
> deal with the size difference between the VSC DIP and the others though.
>
> Another minor snag is that the compiler will complain to use if we keep
> using enum hdmi_infoframe_type type and passing in the DP define instead,
> so et's just change to unsigned int all over for the inforframe type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c | 26 +++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 41 ++++++++-------------------------------
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 4c8451e3d8f1..5dcaa14ff90d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ struct intel_digital_port {
> /* for communication with audio component; protected by av_mutex */
> const struct drm_connector *audio_connector;
> void (*write_infoframe)(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> - enum hdmi_infoframe_type type,
> + unsigned int type,
> const void *frame, ssize_t len);
> void (*set_infoframes)(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> bool enable,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> index 637b17baf798..600a58210450 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdmi.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static struct intel_hdmi *intel_attached_hdmi(struct drm_connector *connector)
> return enc_to_intel_hdmi(&intel_attached_encoder(connector)->base);
> }
>
> -static u32 g4x_infoframe_index(enum hdmi_infoframe_type type)
> +static u32 g4x_infoframe_index(unsigned int type)
> {
> switch (type) {
> case HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_AVI:
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static u32 g4x_infoframe_index(enum hdmi_infoframe_type type)
> }
> }
>
> -static u32 g4x_infoframe_enable(enum hdmi_infoframe_type type)
> +static u32 g4x_infoframe_enable(unsigned int type)
> {
> switch (type) {
> case HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_AVI:
> @@ -98,9 +98,11 @@ static u32 g4x_infoframe_enable(enum hdmi_infoframe_type type)
> }
> }
>
> -static u32 hsw_infoframe_enable(enum hdmi_infoframe_type type)
> +static u32 hsw_infoframe_enable(unsigned int type)
> {
> switch (type) {
> + case DP_SDP_VSC:
Why do we need a new field like this ? Would it make sense to set the
type itself as "HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_AVI" ?
> + return VIDEO_DIP_ENABLE_VSC_HSW;
> case HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_AVI:
> return VIDEO_DIP_ENABLE_AVI_HSW;
> case HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_SPD:
> @@ -116,10 +118,12 @@ static u32 hsw_infoframe_enable(enum hdmi_infoframe_type type)
> static i915_reg_t
> hsw_dip_data_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder,
> - enum hdmi_infoframe_type type,
> + unsigned int type,
> int i)
> {
> switch (type) {
> + case DP_SDP_VSC:
> + return HSW_TVIDEO_DIP_VSC_DATA(cpu_transcoder, i);
> case HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_AVI:
> return HSW_TVIDEO_DIP_AVI_DATA(cpu_transcoder, i);
> case HDMI_INFOFRAME_TYPE_SPD:
> @@ -133,7 +137,7 @@ hsw_dip_data_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> static void g4x_write_infoframe(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> - enum hdmi_infoframe_type type,
> + unsigned int type,
> const void *frame, ssize_t len)
> {
> const uint32_t *data = frame;
> @@ -187,7 +191,7 @@ static bool g4x_infoframe_enabled(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> }
>
> static void ibx_write_infoframe(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> - enum hdmi_infoframe_type type,
> + unsigned int type,
> const void *frame, ssize_t len)
> {
> const uint32_t *data = frame;
> @@ -246,7 +250,7 @@ static bool ibx_infoframe_enabled(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> }
>
> static void cpt_write_infoframe(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> - enum hdmi_infoframe_type type,
> + unsigned int type,
> const void *frame, ssize_t len)
> {
> const uint32_t *data = frame;
> @@ -303,7 +307,7 @@ static bool cpt_infoframe_enabled(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> }
>
> static void vlv_write_infoframe(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> - enum hdmi_infoframe_type type,
> + unsigned int type,
> const void *frame, ssize_t len)
> {
> const uint32_t *data = frame;
> @@ -361,7 +365,7 @@ static bool vlv_infoframe_enabled(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> }
>
> static void hsw_write_infoframe(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> - enum hdmi_infoframe_type type,
> + unsigned int type,
> const void *frame, ssize_t len)
> {
> const uint32_t *data = frame;
> @@ -371,6 +375,8 @@ static void hsw_write_infoframe(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_crtc->config->cpu_transcoder;
> i915_reg_t ctl_reg = HSW_TVIDEO_DIP_CTL(cpu_transcoder);
> i915_reg_t data_reg;
> + int data_size = type == DP_SDP_VSC ?
Ok, I think may be this is the reason why we need a separate filed for
DP_SDP_VSC, is it so ?
- Shashank
> + VIDEO_DIP_VSC_DATA_SIZE : VIDEO_DIP_DATA_SIZE;
> int i;
> u32 val = I915_READ(ctl_reg);
>
> @@ -386,7 +392,7 @@ static void hsw_write_infoframe(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
> data++;
> }
> /* Write every possible data byte to force correct ECC calculation. */
> - for (; i < VIDEO_DIP_DATA_SIZE; i += 4)
> + for (; i < data_size; i += 4)
> I915_WRITE(hsw_dip_data_reg(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder,
> type, i >> 2), 0);
> mmiowb();
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 29a09bf6bd18..904994dd1c9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -72,37 +72,6 @@ static bool vlv_is_psr_active_on_pipe(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
> (val == VLV_EDP_PSR_ACTIVE_SF_UPDATE);
> }
>
> -static void intel_psr_write_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> - const struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc_psr)
> -{
> - struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> - struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(dig_port->base.base.crtc);
> - enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc->config->cpu_transcoder;
> - i915_reg_t ctl_reg = HSW_TVIDEO_DIP_CTL(cpu_transcoder);
> - uint32_t *data = (uint32_t *) vsc_psr;
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> - /* As per BSPec (Pipe Video Data Island Packet), we need to disable
> - the video DIP being updated before program video DIP data buffer
> - registers for DIP being updated. */
> - I915_WRITE(ctl_reg, 0);
> - POSTING_READ(ctl_reg);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*vsc_psr); i += 4) {
> - I915_WRITE(HSW_TVIDEO_DIP_VSC_DATA(cpu_transcoder,
> - i >> 2), *data);
> - data++;
> - }
> - for (; i < VIDEO_DIP_VSC_DATA_SIZE; i += 4)
> - I915_WRITE(HSW_TVIDEO_DIP_VSC_DATA(cpu_transcoder,
> - i >> 2), 0);
> -
> - I915_WRITE(ctl_reg, VIDEO_DIP_ENABLE_VSC_HSW);
> - POSTING_READ(ctl_reg);
> -}
> -
> static void vlv_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> @@ -121,6 +90,7 @@ static void vlv_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> static void skl_psr_setup_su_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> struct edp_vsc_psr psr_vsc;
>
> /* Prepare VSC Header for SU as per EDP 1.4 spec, Table 6.11 */
> @@ -129,11 +99,14 @@ static void skl_psr_setup_su_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB1 = 0x7;
> psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x3;
> psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xb;
> - intel_psr_write_vsc(intel_dp, &psr_vsc);
> +
> + intel_dig_port->write_infoframe(&intel_dig_port->base.base,
> + DP_SDP_VSC, &psr_vsc, sizeof(psr_vsc));
> }
>
> static void hsw_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> struct edp_vsc_psr psr_vsc;
>
> /* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.3 spec, Table 3.10 */
> @@ -142,7 +115,9 @@ static void hsw_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB1 = 0x7;
> psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x2;
> psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0x8;
> - intel_psr_write_vsc(intel_dp, &psr_vsc);
> +
> + intel_dig_port->write_infoframe(&intel_dig_port->base.base,
> + DP_SDP_VSC, &psr_vsc, sizeof(psr_vsc));
> }
>
> static void vlv_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-02 19:55 [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: Make infoframe code available to (e)DP ports ville.syrjala
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/dp: Add defines for DP SDP types ville.syrjala
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Check has_infoframes when enabling infoframes ville.syrjala
2016-06-13 8:10 ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-13 12:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-13 12:47 ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Disable infoframes when shutting down DDI HDMI ville.syrjala
2016-06-13 10:06 ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-13 12:24 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-13 12:48 ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Move infoframe vfuncs into intel_digital_port ville.syrjala
2016-06-13 10:17 ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-13 12:25 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-13 12:54 ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Init infoframe vfuncs for DP encoders as well ville.syrjala
2016-06-13 11:44 ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Remove mostly duplicated video DIP handling from PSR code ville.syrjala
2016-06-13 12:09 ` Sharma, Shashank [this message]
2016-06-13 12:27 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-13 13:14 ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Allow DP ports to set/readout infoframe state (WIP) ville.syrjala
2016-06-13 13:28 ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-14 14:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-14 14:40 ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-15 9:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-03 7:51 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Make infoframe code available to (e)DP ports Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=575EA28B.8020705@intel.com \
--to=shashank.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox