public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Allow DP ports to set/readout infoframe state (WIP)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:10:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57601774.8000709@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160614141642.GX4329@intel.com>

Regards
Shashank

On 6/14/2016 7:46 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 06:58:19PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
>> Regards
>> Shashank
>>
>> On 6/3/2016 1:25 AM, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
>>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> The video DIP can be used with DP ports as well. So let's at least read
>>> out the state, and disable all infoframes when disabling the port.
>>> Otherwise we might get left with whatever the previous guy was doing.
>>>
>>> If we were totally paranaoid, I suppose we might consider doing this
>>> for FDI too on DDI platforms. But that would require first decoupling
>>> the infoframe code from intel_digital_port. So leave it be for now at
>>> least.
>>>
>>> FIXME need to figure out how to handle the PSR VSC SDP usage before
>>> doing this, as that might make the state checker unhappy.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  |  9 +++++++++
>>>    2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>>> index c5611e9d9b9c..6543feeb58f2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>>> @@ -2157,7 +2157,6 @@ void intel_ddi_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>>    	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = encoder->base.dev->dev_private;
>>>    	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc);
>>>    	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = pipe_config->cpu_transcoder;
>>> -	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port;
>>>    	u32 temp, flags = 0;
>>>
>>>    	/* XXX: DSI transcoder paranoia */
>>> @@ -2193,13 +2192,17 @@ void intel_ddi_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>>    		break;
>>>    	}
>>>
>>> -	switch (temp & TRANS_DDI_MODE_SELECT_MASK) {
>>> -	case TRANS_DDI_MODE_SELECT_HDMI:
>>> -		pipe_config->has_hdmi_sink = true;
>>> -		intel_dig_port = enc_to_dig_port(&encoder->base);
>>> +	if (encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_ANALOG) {
>> This will be true for INTEL_OUTPUT_UNUSED, UNKNOWN, eDP, and bunch of
>> more encoder types. Should we add a bit mask for valid encoder types here ?
>
> We only need to care about FDI vs. not. If it's not FDI, then it'll be
> a DDI encoder which has struct intel_digital_port as its base.
But again, what if I got a INTEL_OUTPUT_UNKNOWN here, should we even 
bother to call a infoframe_enabled() for that ? Wont it be better if we 
can just allow (DP | HDMI | eDP etc) ?
>
>>> +		struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port =
>>> +			enc_to_dig_port(&encoder->base);
>>>
>>>    		if (intel_dig_port->infoframe_enabled(&encoder->base, pipe_config))
>>>    			pipe_config->has_infoframe = true;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	switch (temp & TRANS_DDI_MODE_SELECT_MASK) {
>>> +	case TRANS_DDI_MODE_SELECT_HDMI:
>>> +		pipe_config->has_hdmi_sink = true;
>>>    		/* fall through */
>>>    	case TRANS_DDI_MODE_SELECT_DVI:
>>>    		pipe_config->lane_count = 4;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>> index a2d0ee363307..b43009ed1dab 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>>> @@ -2355,6 +2355,7 @@ static void intel_dp_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>>    				struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(&encoder->base);
>>> +	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>>>    	u32 tmp, flags = 0;
>>>    	struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
>>>    	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>> @@ -2395,6 +2396,10 @@ static void intel_dp_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>>    	    !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev) && tmp & DP_COLOR_RANGE_16_235)
>>>    		pipe_config->limited_color_range = true;
>>>
>>> +	if (intel_dig_port->infoframe_enabled &&
>>> +	    intel_dig_port->infoframe_enabled(&encoder->base, pipe_config))
>>> +		pipe_config->has_infoframe = true;
>>> +
>>>    	pipe_config->has_dp_encoder = true;
>>>
>>>    	pipe_config->lane_count =
>>> @@ -3343,6 +3348,10 @@ intel_dp_link_down(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>    		intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev_priv, PIPE_A, true);
>>>    	}
>>>
>>> +	if (intel_dig_port->set_infoframes)
>>> +		intel_dig_port->set_infoframes(&intel_dig_port->base.base,
>>> +					       NULL, false);
>>> +
>>>    	msleep(intel_dp->panel_power_down_delay);
>>>
>>>    	intel_dp->DP = DP;
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-14 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-02 19:55 [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915: Make infoframe code available to (e)DP ports ville.syrjala
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/dp: Add defines for DP SDP types ville.syrjala
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Check has_infoframes when enabling infoframes ville.syrjala
2016-06-13  8:10   ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-13 12:24     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-13 12:47       ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Disable infoframes when shutting down DDI HDMI ville.syrjala
2016-06-13 10:06   ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-13 12:24     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-13 12:48       ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Move infoframe vfuncs into intel_digital_port ville.syrjala
2016-06-13 10:17   ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-13 12:25     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-13 12:54       ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Init infoframe vfuncs for DP encoders as well ville.syrjala
2016-06-13 11:44   ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Remove mostly duplicated video DIP handling from PSR code ville.syrjala
2016-06-13 12:09   ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-13 12:27     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-13 13:14       ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Allow DP ports to set/readout infoframe state (WIP) ville.syrjala
2016-06-13 13:28   ` Sharma, Shashank
2016-06-14 14:16     ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-14 14:40       ` Sharma, Shashank [this message]
2016-06-15  9:37         ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-06-03  7:51 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915: Make infoframe code available to (e)DP ports Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57601774.8000709@intel.com \
    --to=shashank.sharma@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox