From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Remove one unnecessary variable
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:02:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57694911.3020100@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160621130033.GP1821@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On 21/06/16 14:00, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 01:48:23PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> No need for local struct drm_device * since dev_priv is the
>> correct thing to pass in to NEEDS_WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating
>> anyway. Changed the macro definition for the latter to reflect
>> that as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 7 ++++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 3 +--
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index 48928227bdcc..3775d26ac573 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -2788,9 +2788,10 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
>> #define HAS_BROKEN_CS_TLB(dev) (IS_I830(dev) || IS_845G(dev))
>>
>> /* WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating:skl,bxt */
>> -#define NEEDS_WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating(dev) (IS_BXT_REVID(dev, 0, BXT_REVID_A1) || \
>> - IS_SKL_GT3(dev) || \
>> - IS_SKL_GT4(dev))
>> +#define NEEDS_WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating(dev_priv) (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, \
>> + 0, BXT_REVID_A1) || \
>> + IS_SKL_GT3(dev_priv) || \
>> + IS_SKL_GT4(dev_priv))
>
> #define NEEDS_WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating(dev_priv) \
> (IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_A1) || \
> IS_SKL_GT3(dev_priv) ||
> IS_SKL_GT4(dev_priv))
>
> Other than that,
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>
> Just wondering if you fancy having a go at IS_SKL_GT(dev_priv, min, max)...
What do you have in mind?
This is a single call site for them BTW. And GCC amazingly does manage
to merge the two GT tests on its own already. :)
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-21 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-21 12:48 [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Remove one unnecessary variable Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-21 13:00 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-21 14:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2016-06-21 15:04 ` Chris Wilson
2016-06-21 13:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-06-21 13:37 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2016-06-21 14:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-06-21 14:41 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: warning for drm/i915/guc: Remove one unnecessary variable (rev2) Patchwork
2016-06-21 14:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57694911.3020100@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox