Re: [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/huc: Add debugfs for HuC loading status check

[Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>]

On 21/06/16 19:11, Peter Antoine wrote:
> From: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
>
> Add debugfs entry for HuC loading status check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 69964c2..f5976f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2479,6 +2479,37 @@ static int i915_llc(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> +static int i915_huc_load_status_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct drm_info_node *node = m->private;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node->minor->dev->dev_private;
> +	struct intel_uc_fw *huc_fw = &dev_priv->huc.huc_fw;
> +
> +	if (!HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv->dev))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	seq_puts(m, "HuC firmware status:\n");
> +	seq_printf(m, "\tpath: %s\n", huc_fw->uc_fw_path);
> +	seq_printf(m, "\tfetch: %s\n",
> +		intel_uc_fw_status_repr(huc_fw->fetch_status));
> +	seq_printf(m, "\tload: %s\n",
> +		intel_uc_fw_status_repr(huc_fw->load_status));
> +	seq_printf(m, "\tversion wanted: %d.%d\n",
> +		huc_fw->major_ver_wanted, huc_fw->minor_ver_wanted);
> +	seq_printf(m, "\tversion found: %d.%d\n",
> +		huc_fw->major_ver_found, huc_fw->minor_ver_found);
> +	seq_printf(m, "\theader: offset is %d; size = %d\n",
> +		huc_fw->header_offset, huc_fw->header_size);
> +	seq_printf(m, "\tuCode: offset is %d; size = %d\n",
> +		huc_fw->ucode_offset, huc_fw->ucode_size);
> +	seq_printf(m, "\tRSA: offset is %d; size = %d\n",
> +		huc_fw->rsa_offset, huc_fw->rsa_size);
> +
> +	seq_printf(m, "\nHuC status 0x%08x:\n", I915_READ(HUC_STATUS2));
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int i915_guc_load_status_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>   {
>   	struct drm_info_node *node = m->private;
> @@ -5432,6 +5463,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = {
>   	{"i915_guc_info", i915_guc_info, 0},
>   	{"i915_guc_load_status", i915_guc_load_status_info, 0},
>   	{"i915_guc_log_dump", i915_guc_log_dump, 0},
> +	{"i915_huc_load_status", i915_huc_load_status_info, 0},
>   	{"i915_frequency_info", i915_frequency_info, 0},
>   	{"i915_hangcheck_info", i915_hangcheck_info, 0},
>   	{"i915_drpc_info", i915_drpc_info, 0},
>

This is OK, although it should probably be unified with the GuC load 
status function (i.e. two trivial wrappers round a common printing 
function). But we can do that later, so:

Reviewed-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx